Skip to main content

The Watchtower Society - Timing is Everything.

 


Do you know what a promise box is? Someone bought one for me many years ago. It is a small box containing perhaps a hundred or so cards. On each card is a verse of Scripture. The idea behind the promise box is that a random card should be chosen each day and whatever verse is on that card, you should hold as God’s promise for you personally. Sounds fine until you realise that each verse has been plucked completely out of its context. When placed back into its context, it is often discovered that the verse has nothing to do with you personally and perhaps means something completely different from what you think it means.

You may have heard of the man who, looking for guidance from God, opened his Bible randomly and read the following: ‘And throwing down the pieces of silver into the temple, he (Judas) departed, and he went and hanged himself.’ (Matthew 27:5). The man, believing this was not very edifying, flicked through his Bible again and read these words: And Jesus said to him, “You go, and do likewise.” (Luke 10:37).

What do we learn from the promise box and this story? We learn that randomly plucking out bible verses and applying them to your life can be damaging to your health.

THE IMPORTANCE OF CONTEXT

Context is essential. It is not just the immediate context that is important, context needs to be much wider. Let’s go back to the promise box for a moment. Of course, as Sovereign, God could indeed speak to you through the verse pulled out of its context, but I would suggest that is far from the norm. To really understand the meaning of the promise box verse, it must be placed in its original context and questions need to be asked. When was it written? To whom was it written? How does it fit in with the rest of the paragraph, chapter, book? How is it to be understood in the context of wider Biblical truth? What about historically? How have those who have gone before us understood it?

A TIME FOR EVERYTHING

It is said that those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it, and so we now come to the 137th Annual Meeting of the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania, which took place on the 2nd October 2021.

The meeting, which took place at the World Headquarters of The Jehovah’s Witnesses in Warwick, New York, was chaired by the Governing Body member Mark Sanderson and he opened the gathering by talking about ‘Time’.

‘Do you know what time it is?’ he asked rhetorically. He continued by telling the assembled gathering that Jehovah is the great timekeeper. I would agree that the Sovereign God, who is outside of the constraints of time, plans and purposes everything according to His good pleasure and timing.

And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose. (Romans 8:28)

But when the fullness of time had come, God sent forth his Son, born of woman, born under the law, to redeem those who were under the law, so that we might receive adoption as sons. (Galatians 4:4-5)

Sanderson continued by mentioning Ecclesiastes 3:1 and saying that there is a time for everything, and that the Bible speaks of a right time for various events.

He then offered Leviticus 26:3-4 as an example:

“‘If you continue walking in my statutes and keeping my commandments and you carry them out, I will give you showers of rain at their proper time, and the land will yield its produce, and the trees of the field will give their fruit. (NWT)

He pointed out that the ‘proper time’ is important. He said: ‘If rain came at the right time, it would yield a bumper crop, but if rain came at the wrong time, it could completely destroy that same crop.’

This is very true. God’s timing in all things is vitally important. We need to be aware of when God has a hand in something and when He does not; when God is saying something and when He is not. To get it wrong could prove disastrous. To quote Mark Sanderson there is a ‘fundamental principle – timing is everything’.

WOLF

I’m sure you have heard the story of the boy who cried wolf. Bored in his job of looking after the sheep, he decided to liven things up by crying wolf, so the townspeople would come running to protect the sheep. After the people fell for the lie twice, they decided to stay put when the boy cried wolf for the third time. Sadly, for the boy, and even more tragically for the animals in his care, the wolf was present and so the sheep perished.

Now let us think about this for a moment. No one would blame the people for not listening to the boy, after all he had been wrong/lied twice. But let me paint an alternative reality. What if the people forgot, or chose not to remember, the boy’s previous errors/lies and so they dutifully ran out every time the boy cried wolf? Should they be considered foolish? Would we believe that the people have in some way been beguiled?

What I found unbelievable about Mark Sanderson’s talk at the Watchtower’s Annual Meeting, is that it was received without any challenge. You could not hear anyone shouting: ‘But you have been wrong before so why should we believe you now?’

Sanderson’s talk was given without any historical context. No reference was made to previously held teachings (errors) or so-called words from Jehovah that never came to pass. As Sanderson said: ‘timing is everything’ and this was clearly not the time to mention the numerous prophecies that the Watchtower Society has got wrong in its 137 years.

Just as the townspeople were right not to trust the boy who cried wolf because he had proved himself unreliable, so those aware of the past false and unreliable teachings of the Watchtower should not trust those who have also proved themselves untrustworthy.

FORGETTING or IGNORING?

Question. Are the rank-and-file Jehovah’s Witnesses forgetful, ignorant, or blinded by the enemy of their souls? When confronted with their past, the usual response from Jehovah’s Witnesses is to say we have never claimed to be prophets, or we have admitted our mistakes. But God’s organisation has claimed to be a prophet speaking for Jehovah:

So, does Jehovah have a prophet to help them, to warn them of changes and to declare things to come? . . . .These questions can be answered in the affirmative. Who is this prophet?. . . .This prophet was not one man, but was a body of men and women. It was the small group of footstep followers of Jesus Christ, known at that time as International Bible Student s. Today they are known as Jehovah’s Christian witnesses. Of course it is easy to say that this group acts as a “prophet” of God. It is another thing to prove it. The only way that this can be done is to review the record. What does it show?[1]

Next week, as I continue to consider Mark Sanderson’s words that timing is everything, I will discuss the ‘times’ that the Watchtower Society have cried wolf. 



[1] The Watchtower (April 1, 1972): 197.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...