Skip to main content

The Watchtower Society - Time to Trust Jesus

 


“But concerning that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but the Father only.

Matthew 24:36

Right on Time

In this final article covering the talk given by Governing Body member Mark Sanderson at the 2021 Annual Conference, I continue to ask if the Watchtower Society should be trusted. 

After reminding his hearers that ‘timing is everything’ Mark Sanderson, spoke of three prophesied events that took place right on time.

He said:

‘Jesus was baptised at precisely the right time that the Messiah was due to appear.’

‘The Kingdom began its heavenly rule right on time in 1914.’

‘Jehovah has set the time, even the exact day and the hour for the end of this wicked system of things.’

Let’s consider these three events.

‘Jesus was baptised at precisely the right time that the Messiah was due to appear.’

In their book: You Can Live Forever on a Paradise Earth, the Watchtower Society have a picture of Jesus being baptised by John the Baptist. Below the picture it says that Jesus became the Christ at His baptism, but is this what the Bible teaches? Did Jesus become the Messiah at the ‘right time’ at his baptism or was he the Messiah from birth?

Messiah/Christ

The word Messiah is a Hebrew word which means anointed one. The Greek equivalent of Messiah is the word Christ and in Luke’s gospel we read these words from the birth narrative:

And in the same region there were shepherds out in the field, keeping watch over their flock by night. And an angel of the Lord appeared to them, and the glory of the Lord shone around them, and they were filled with great fear. And the angel said to them, “Fear not, for behold, I bring you good news of great joy that will be for all the people. For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, who is Christ the Lord.  (Luke 2:8-11) (Bold mine)

Did you notice what Luke didn’t say? He didn’t say that Jesus will be Christ ‘at the right time’ and this will be at His baptism. He said that the child born is Christ from birth.

So, Sanderson’s first example is false. What of his second example?

‘The Kingdom began its heavenly rule right on time in 1914.’

Where do the Watchtower Society get this from? They would argue from the Bible, but the year 1914 is nowhere mentioned therein.

Mathematical Gymnastics

From the beginning the Watchtower Society has been obsessed with working out when Jesus would return. Their founder Charles Taze Russell originally taught that Jesus would return ‘right on time’ in 1874. This of course did not happen and so the date moved to 1914. It was believed that Jesus would visibly return, but when that didn’t happen, it was decided that the word the Greek word ‘Parousia’ meant spiritual presence rather than visible arrival. The teaching that Jesus returned ‘invisibly’ in 1914 has been held by the Watchtower Society ever since.

1914

How does The Watchtower Society arrive at the date 1914?

It is by counting from 607 BCE as the beginning of the Gentile times that they arrive at 1914. They calculate the reference in Daniel 4:16 of “seven times” to be seven lots of 360, the number of days in a Jewish year. This comes to 2,520 years. Counting from 607 BCE the date 1914 is arrived at. [607 BCE + 2,520 = 1914 CE]. However, if 607 BCE is inaccurate then 1914 and all that it stands for falls to the ground.[1]

This whole equation is predicated upon the date of the fall of Jerusalem being 607 B.C.E., but the evidence points to the fact that Jerusalem fell in 586/7 B.C.E.


Therefore, we see that Jesus did not take his throne in heaven – ‘right on time’ in 1914. It is a nonsense. You can read more about this here.

So, Sanderson’s second example is false. What of his third example?

‘Jehovah has set the time, even the exact day and the hour for the end of this wicked system of things.’

Sanderson asked: ‘Does the Governing Body know when Armageddon is going to come?’ Anxious laughter was heard when he said: ‘Yes we do’. This was followed by relieved laughter when he said: ‘It’s going to come right on time.’

‘We have confidence don’t we, that Jehovah will bring those earth-shaking events exactly on time.’

I agree with Mark Sanderson here. The return of Jesus will be ‘right on time’ and God alone knows when this will be. The Watchtower Society have proven themselves clueless.

Throughout their history they have offered dates for the return of Jesus – all of which have proven false. Their excuse is to say that, though they have made mistakes, they have always been honest in their failings and that they never claimed to be prophets. Their history shows that they are not being honesty.   

Distinguishing the True From the False. In some cases, such as that of Moses, Elijah, Elisha, and Jesus, God’s prophets performed miraculous works that attested to the genuineness of their message and office. Not all, however, are recorded as performing such powerful works. The three essentials for establishing the credentials of a true prophet, as given through Moses, were: The true prophet would speak in Jehovah’s name; the things foretold would come to pass (De 18:20-22); and his prophesying must promote true worship, being in harmony with God’s revealed word and commandments (De 13:1-4).[2]

As Jehovah’s Witnesses are keen to tell us, they alone witness for Jehovah. They are the group that honour God by using the Divine name – Jehovah. The quote above tells us that ‘the true prophet would speak in Jehovah’s name’ so who is that? That is them. If they are a prophet speaking for Jehovah, can they get things wrong? The Bible says no.

"However, the prophet who presumes to speak in my name a word that I have not commanded him to speak or who speaks in the name of other gods, that prophet must die. And in case you should say in your heart: "How shall we know the word that Jehovah has not spoken?" when the prophet speaks in the name of Jehovah and the word does not occur or come true, that is the word that Jehovah did not speak. With presumptuousness the prophet spoke it." Deuteronomy 18:20-22

The Watchtower Society have proved themselves to be false prophets time and again. If this group, who claim to speak for Jehovah can get things wrong, can anything they teach be trusted? What may be true today – could be false tomorrow.

Time to Trust Jesus

Mark Sanderson and the rest of the Governing Body are blind guides. They are in the dark themselves and leading their adherents into that same darkness. It is now the right time for Jehovah’s Witnesses to repent and leave the false prophet that is the Watchtower Society. They need come to the One who is the same yesterday, today and forevermore. Jesus will indeed come at the right time but only those who belong to Him will be saved. Time is running out. Today is the day of salvation!  



[1] https://reachouttrust.org/the-watchtower-society-1914-2/

[2] https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/1200003562




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...