Skip to main content

NEW YEAR - SAME OLD PROBLEM

 


A New Year usually brings a fresh wave of optimism. There appears to be an opportunity for a fresh start, a chance to get your house in order, the possibility of doing something different.

Each year people resolve such things as losing weight, giving up smoking, not drinking as much, going to the gym, or learning a new language. None of these are bad in and of themselves, but very few people will continue these activities much beyond February. Why is it that people resolve to try and change themselves?

Change

Did you hear of the small boy who swallowed a pound coin? When his mother called the doctor to ask of her son’s condition, the doctor said: ‘I’m afraid there has been no change’.

There is something deep within us human beings that causes us to be dissatisfied with our lives. We know things are not right and so we seek to change. Realising the truth of this, the American author, Henry David Thoreau said that: ‘The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation’, meaning that most people are unfulfilled and discontented with their lives.

The early church theologian, Augustine of Hippo, also recognised that happiness and contentment are not easy to find. He believed that the world cannot ultimately give people the change they truly seek, and that people will always be restless until they find their rest in the Creator. He said:

“You have made us for yourself, O Lord, 

and our heart is restless until it rests in you.”

Without a relationship with God people will always be discontent, crawling around in the dark seeking to find meaning and purpose. Longing to look and be different, people tend to look in all the wrong places. True peace and happiness can never be found in the gym, the pub or at a Weight Watchers session.

Of course, here I speak of those who probably have little/no religious affiliation. It is a gloomy truth, that the last place in the world they would look for a fresh start is God.

The Religious

What of those who are of a religious persuasion? By the term ‘religious’ I mean those who seek meaning and purpose outside of Biblical Christianity. They also may find themselves resolving to do some of the things previously mentioned (again nothing wrong with that) but ultimately, they will usually seek to derive their peace through their religious profession and practice.

As they follow their religious leaders and sacred texts, they are seeking to please their Creator and, through their efforts, they would hope to be on their way to their version of heaven. But they are wrong. How dare I say this? Who am I to make such a declaration? Surely this is not an opinion to be voiced in 2022.

The Way

But my words on this matter are not my own rather they are the words of the One whom I seek to follow.

Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.  (John 14:1-6)

Jesus makes a clear statement. He is the WAY, He is the TRUTH, He is the LIFE, and NO ONE comes to the Father except through HIM.

They are many, that is the religious, who would agree that they have a need of Jesus, but are they trusting Him alone for their salvation?

Same Problem

As they begin a New Year, such people will not be resolving to find and follow the biblical Jesus, for they trust they already have him. In believing this, they carry over into a new year the same old problem. What is the problem I speak of? They will unwittingly seek to find meaning, purpose and peace through a religious system that offers them a false Jesus and another Saviour.

Yes, they see a need for Jesus, and may speak fondly of Jesus, but theirs is a different Jesus. A non-biblical, non-orthodox, non-historical Jesus who is only a bit part player, an added extra, one who comes very much second to their real saviours.

The ‘Real’ Saviours

For Mormons the real saviour is Joseph Smith. It is he who restored true Christianity, it is of him that a Mormon must have a testimony, and it is to him that Mormons ultimately look for their salvation.

NO SALVATION WITHOUT ACCEPTING JOSEPH SMITH. If Joseph Smith was verily a prophet, and if he told the truth when he said that he stood in the presence of angels sent from the Lord, and obtained keys of authority, and the commandment to organize the Church of Jesus Christ once again on the earth, then this knowledge is of the most vital importance to the entire world. No man can reject that testimony without incurring the most dreadful consequences, for he cannot enter the kingdom of god. It is, therefore, the duty of every man to investigate that he may weigh this matter carefully and know the truth. (Doctrines of Salvation 1:189)

For the Jehovah’s Witnesses salvation cannot be found through faith in Jesus alone, but more importantly a belief and trust in the Governing Body (the Faithful and Discreet Slave) is needed.

"Come to Jehovah's organization for salvation" Watchtower 1981 Nov 15 p.212

"Consider, too, the fact that Jehovah's organization alone, in all the earth, is directed by God's holy spirit or active force. (Zech. 4:6) Only this organization functions for Jehovah's purpose and to his praise. To it alone God's Sacred Word, the Bible, is not a sealed book." Watchtower 1973 Jul 1 p.402

"Demonstrating trust in Jehovah also involves trusting his organization and those whom he is using to take the lead ... Now more than ever before, it is important to demonstrate complete trust in Jehovah" Elders Meet With Regular Pioneers, Special Pioneers, and Field Missionaries Oct 2020 S-211-21-E 10/20

Whilst these groups, and many others like them, resolve year after year to have the same old problem, there is a work for Reachout Trust to do. In 2022 we will continue, and find it necessary, to contend for the faith that was once for all delivered to the saints. (Jude 3).


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...