Skip to main content

The Watch Tower's Fallible Leaders

 


Who is Leading God's People Today? Are They Faithful and Wise?

In this online article the Watch Tower's Governing Body attempts to lay out its credentials as the 'faithful and discreet slave' (NWT)of Mt.24:45.

Who really is the faithful and discreet slave whom his master appointed over his domestics, to give them their food at the proper time?’ (NWT 2013 ed.)

Who then is the faithful and wise servant whom his master has set over his household to give them food at the proper time?’ (ESV)


The Standard

The dominating theme of Matthew 24 is the return of Jesus Christ. When the disciples asked him, ‘when will these things be, and what will be the sign of your coming and of the close of the age?’ (v.3) Jesus talked about signs, he didn’t talk about dates. The task of the Christian believer is watchfulness, because, ‘concerning that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but the Father only.’ (v.38) His return will be sudden, unexpected, like a flash of lightening (v27)

The role of the faithful and wise servant then is of paramount importance because, ‘many will come in my name, saying, ‘I am the Christ,’ and they will lead you astray.’ (24:5) There is no room here for tardiness. James solemnly warns, Not many of you should become teachers, my brothers, for you know that we who teach will be judged with greater strictness.’ (James 3:1)


The Model

The article begins by presenting a picture of the first century apostles being the governing body of the Christian congregation. They point out four things that gave that early congregation confidence that the governing body was directed by Jehovah God through their Leader, Jesus.

1. Holy spirit guided the governing body

2. Angels assisted the governing body

3. God’s Word guided the governing body

4. Jesus led the governing body

Given this, what would be your reasonable expectations? Yes, I know what you’re thinking. Yet, with the guidance of ‘holy spirit,’ the assistance of angels, the guidance of God’s Word, and the leadership of the One who said, ’I will never leave you nor forsake you,’ (Heb.13:5) cults such as the Watch Tower Society would have us believe that early congregation fell into apostasy. This is the leadership that ‘turned the world upside down.’ (Acts 17:6)


Who Really is the Faithful and Discreet Slave?

In 1896, we are told, Charles Russell wrote of the work of the Watch Tower: “We want no homage, no reverence, for ourselves or our writings; nor do we wish to be called Reverend or Rabbi. Nor do we wish that any should be called by our name.” He later stated: “This is not man’s work.”


Jehovah’s Witnesses are, therefore, urged to think of today’s Governing Body as that faithful servant, doing God's work. They present evidence in their article to show, ‘This is not man’s work.’

1. These men discover and explain ‘the deep things of God’! (1 Cor.2:10)

2. What they speak they speak, ‘not with words taught by human wisdom, but with those taught by the spirit (sic)’ (1 Cor.2:13)

3. The work continues, ‘with supernatural assistance.’

4. ‘[No] other religious organization [has] been willing to rely fully on God’s Word.’

It sounds so promising, doesn’t it? But how does reality square up to this picture of spirit-led, supernaturally assisted, Word-guided, depth-diving leaders? How faithful, how wise (ESV) can the Governing Body be in light of the following quote from the article?

'The Governing Body is neither inspired nor infallible. Therefore, it can err in doctrinal matters or in organizational direction. In fact, the Watch Tower Publications Index includes the heading “Beliefs Clarified,” which lists adjustments in our Scriptural understanding since 1870.'

I knew you would appreciate a list so here are two:

Beliefs Clarified: 1930-1985

Beliefs Clarified: 1986-2022

How does this’ clarification’ work? Look at this one example among so many and see if you see what I see. It is liberally peppered with speculation, using such words and phrases as, ‘it took time for them to discern’; they were ‘led to conclude’; ‘the Bible students thought…’; the Bible students concluded’; ‘the Bible students believed’; ‘it was thought’; and this little gem:

The Bible Students also thought that perhaps some who would serve as earthly “princes” during that time—including the resurrected “ancient worthies” (faithful men who died before Christ)— would somehow be rewarded with heavenly life at the end of the Millennium.’

They thought...perhaps...it was thought? We know all this is rationalised away with the idea ‘the light of truth shines brighter’ with the passing of time. However, as with Mormons and other groups, what is happening is current leaders are contradicting old doctrine in response to cultural and social pressures and as they simply realise, ‘oops, we got that wrong.’ Barry Amor sums it up well on our Facebook discussion:

Where did the 'old light' come from, if the 'new light' is truth and contradicts the 'old light' doesn't that make the 'old light' a lie? So, where did it come from? I can see 4 possibilities;

1. It came from Jehovah, but the Bible tells us that He cannot lie (Titus 1 v 2) and I think we'd all agree that a God who lies to us is not a true God!

2. It came from Jehovah but the Governing Body misheard it or misunderstood it. This would tell us the Governing Body is not very good at listening or understanding and so we should be very wary of believing what they say as it could so easily be wrong.

3. The Governing Body made it up of their own understanding. The Governing Body accepts that it is not infallible and does make mistakes so how could we trust men who cannot be trusted to speak the truth?

4. It came from Satan. Satan does appear sometimes as an angel of light (2 Cor 11 v 14) and he is the father of lies (John 8 v 44) so this would fit well with what he does.

I cannot think of any other option and none of the above encourage me to trust in men who pronounce things that are not true.

Oh, and then there are those dates Jesus never mentioned...not once.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...