Skip to main content

THE FREE GIFT



The man was trying to give people something, but no one was taking it. Most ignored him, many crossed the road to avoid him and the odd one who did listen refused his offer. He wasn’t trying to sell something, nor did he appear to be some crazed religious fanatic, but clearly people did not want what he was offering. What was he handing out that seemed so objectionable? Five-pound notes. What a monster!

You don’t get owt for nowt.

We have a saying in Yorkshire: ‘You don’t get owt for nowt’. Now for those of you not fortunate enough to have been born in God’s own county, let me translate. It means: ‘One does not receive something without paying for it’.

I recently had to visit someone in hospital. Upon arriving in the car park, I made my way to the Pay Station. There was a notice on the machine which said: Machine broken – parking is free today. As parking at hospitals can be quite costly, I should have been jumping for joy, but not me, I was suspicious. Parking at the hospital can’t be free - right? So, I pulled out my phone and took a photograph of the sign, just in case. We are by nature, suspicious of anything labelled free.

Now back to our friend with the five-pound notes. Why were people not taking them from him? As I said, most were not even listening to him and the ones who did appeared highly sceptical. One said: ‘Oh yeah, what’s the catch?’ You see there must be a catch because you don’t get owt for nowt – right? 

Is it really free?

I believe those refusing the free five-pound note can be broadly put into three groups; let’s call them:

The Distraught, The Desirable and The Disheartened.

The Distraught

The distraught are ones who have no desire for the five-pound note. Why? Because these ones simply cannot see or hear what the man is offering.

They are so weighed down by the pressures and circumstances of life, that each day is a struggle just to survive. So pre-occupied are they with the things of this world, that they do not even hear what is on offer. They reject the free gift without even knowing what it is.

Jesus knew people like this. He said these people were harassed and helpless, like sheep without a shepherd.

The Desirable

The desirable are ones who are interested in the five-pound note, but they want to know what they need to do to receive it. They see the gift, and want the gift, but they cannot accept that it is free – they must play their part to earn it. This belief is a central tenet of so-called Christian cults.

A verse from the Book of Mormon, familiar to Latter-day Saints is 2 Nephi 25:23: 

“For we labor diligently to write, to persuade our children, and also our brethren, to believe in Christ, and to be reconciled to God; for we know that it is by grace that we are saved, after all we can do.”

Though this verse is often played down or re-interpreted by modern Mormons, traditionally it has been understood to mean what it says. We are saved by grace (the free gift) but we can only obtain it after we have done all we can do (we have to earn it).

It is the same for the Jehovah’s Witnesses:

Salvation cannot be earned by attendance at meetings or in any other way. It is free, a gift from God. Yet, Jehovah God does require efforts on our part if we are to receive his gift of everlasting life’  Watchtower. 15 Jan 1986 p.10

Note what is being said sounds like a contradiction. Salvation is a free gift but God does require efforts on our part (we have to earn it).

Does a free gift require payment?

Imagine buying your partner a wonderful gift, something they have always wanted. You have wrapped it beautifully and, as you present it to your loved one, you say ‘I have bought you a gift’. They excitedly unwrap it and when they see what you have got them, they throw their arms around you; at which point you pull a receipt out of your pocket and say: ‘That will be £100 please.’ The moment you do that, and I don’t suggest you try that on a loved one, the gift ceases to be a gift.

The Disheartened

The final group are ones who are interested in the five-pound note, but they don’t believe they deserve it. It doesn’t matter how much you tell them that it is gratis, and they don’t have to do anything to earn it, they cannot accept the free gift.

There are many who, like this, feel unworthy and unlovable, too sinful for the free gift. This reminds me of the time Peter experienced the miraculous catch of fish and he said to Jesus: “Depart from me, for I am a sinful man, O Lord.” (Luke 5:8)

Peter response to the free gift from Jesus (in this case, a net full of fish), was to say I’m not worthy.

Friends there is a fourth group, consisting of those who gladly receive the free gift. These are the ones who, being harassed and helpless, seek a Shepherd. They are the ones who realise that there is nothing they can do to earn the free gift, so they just receive it. These ones knowing that they are unworthy, give thanks to God for the free gift of grace.

For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast. For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them. 

Ephesians 2:8-10


 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...