Skip to main content

My Visit to The Memorial Meal of Jehovah's Witnesses (part 2)

 


I was completely unaware. There appeared no reason for me to be concerned. The two softly spoken, well dressed and extremely friendly people opened their bibles and, showing me various verses, they told me what the future held for me.

They said that my recently deceased mother, though not a Jehovah’s Witness, will be resurrected to the earth and given a second chance. When I asked if I would see her again, they offered me three potential scenarios:

1)  If I died before Armageddon - God’s coming judgement which was to happen very soon - I may also be given a second chance and be reunited with my mum.

2)  If Armageddon comes whilst I am still alive, they told me this was very possible, I will probably be annihilated.

3)  If I became a loyal and obedient follower of Jehovah, I could survive Armageddon and be reunited with my mother. We can then join the great crowd who are tasked with restoring earth to its paradisical beginnings.

So, I bought the suit and the briefcase and began to study with Jehovah’s Witnesses. Now let us return to the Memorial Meal.

The brother was now to address his next question:

Who will benefit from Jesus’ loving sacrifice?

As the brother asked this second question, a picture appeared on the screen.

It showed Jesus sitting on a throne in heaven, with 144,000 behind him. Before him, as if on earth, were a great crowd wearing white and waving palm branches.

If you are attending the Memorial Meal as a Jehovah’s Witness, the picture, and its meaning, would have not needed any explanation; but if you were an invited non-witness guest you were about to be taught a belief peculiar to the Watchtower.

Though they never call it such, the picture portrayed a two-tier salvation. Watchtower theology teaches that only those with a heavenly hope are in the new covenant. They are the only ones that need to be born again and they alone have Jesus as their mediator.

Oblivious to the eternal implications of this false teaching, most Jehovah’s Witnesses blindly follow what their leaders tell them. They are taught that, because they only have an earthly hope, they need not be born again, but what did Jesus say:

“Most truly I say to you, Unless anyone is born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.” John 3:3 (NWT)

Note the word ‘anyone’. Jesus did not say ‘unless you as one of the 144,000 is born again.’

Also, what of the devastating teaching that Jesus is only a mediator for the 144,000? This is what The Watchtower says:

 At a time when God was selecting those to be taken into that new covenant, the apostle Paul wrote that Christ was the “One mediator between God and men.’ (1 Tim. 2:5) Reasonably Paul was here using the word ‘mediator” in the same way he did the other five times, which occurred before the writing of 1 Timothy 2:5, referring to those then being taken into the new covenant for which Christ is “mediator.’ So in this strict Biblical sense Jesus is the “mediator” only for anointed Christians. The new covenant will terminate with the glorification of the remnant who are today in that covenant mediated by Christ. “This great crowd” of “other sheep” that is forming today is not in the new covenant. However by their associating with the little flock of those yet in that covenant they come under benefits that flow from that new covenant.’[1]

Could this sound any more like a two-tier salvation?

The brother, perhaps pre-empting people’s thoughts, was quick to point out that whether your future lies in heaven or on the earth, Jehovah loves you just the same. In other words, there is no need to feel bad if he has not chosen you for heaven. Jesus’ loving sacrifice benefits all, but it appears he especially loves those called to a heavenly hope. 

Who gets to heaven and who will be on the earth?

If you asked the question: How do you get to heaven as a Jehovah’s Witness?

The answer would be: Well, Jehovah just chooses you.

If you asked: How do you know Jehovah has chosen you?

The answer is: Well, you just know.

We were told that if you we in any way unsure, if we have any doubts about whether we are called to heaven, then we are not.

The verse often wheeled out at this point will be familiar to evangelical Christians. Romans 8:16 (NWT)

The spirit itself bears witness with our spirit that we are God’s children.

Rather than understanding Paul’s words to be applicable to all those who are born again of the Spirit of God, the Watchtower teaches that Paul was speaking to a limited number of ‘born-again’ ones. With zero exegetical reasoning, the Watchtower inexplicably rationalises that Paul was speaking about the 144,000 found in Revelation 7.

With no consideration to the context, and no reference to historical Christian belief, the brother began to explain the image on the screen. Beginning with the words ‘The Bible teaches that…’  he said that a limited number (144,000) will be in heaven with Jehovah and Jesus and a limitless number of people will live on a paradise earth. There was no in-depth Bible study to show why this was true. He showed no working out – he just declared that what he was saying was what the Bible teaches.

He then made a statement and posed a question: ‘This is the hope that the Bible holds out for two groups of obedient mankind, but who goes to heaven?’

Do good people go to heaven?

The brother rightly pointed out that the popular belief that only good people go to heaven is not true. None of us are good. So, who gets to heaven?

Well, that is limited to the 144,000.

Revelation chapter 7 not only informs the reader of the number 144,000, but also that these ones are from the 12 tribes of Israel. The Watchtower contends that the listed tribes of Israel are to be understood spiritually. Can you guess who they teach spiritual Israel to be?  

Welcome to the inconsistent and baffling hermeneutic of the Watchtower Society. They believe 144,000 (Revelation 7:4) to be a literal number, but the then listed 12 tribes (Revelation 7:4-8) to be only figurative – go figure!

They also consider everything else mentioned about the 144,000 to be figurative: from the tribes of Israel; having the name of Lamb and Father on their foreheads; they are virgins; having no falsehood in their mouths; and without blemish… If all this is figurative then why should the 144,000 be literal? Or, if the 144,000 is literal, why can’t everything else in the following context be understood literally?

There is no rhyme nor reason for their interpretation, other than to support their erroneous man-made doctrine.

In fact, if one reads Revelation 6:12 through to Revelation 7:17, noting that there were no chapters and verses in the original language, we find the opposite of what the Watchtower teaches. The 144,000 are seen to be on the earth (note the description of their location), with the great crowd in heaven (note the description of their location).

If you were to have Jehovah’s Witnesses read these verses in their own bible, pointing out that it says the opposite of what they have been taught, you will quickly hear a denial. They will respond with things like: ‘you need to consider all that the Bible says’ or ‘you don’t understand the context’ or something similar. In reality, it is they who fail to consider the immediate and entire biblical context. They will believe whatever their ‘real’ authority tells them.

This can be demonstrated by asking them the following question: Where is the great crowd located?

They will always say the great crowd is on the earth. You should then ask them to read Revelation 19:1 in their bible:

‘After these things I heard what was as a loud voice of a great crowd in heaven. They said: “Praise Jah, YOU people! The salvation and the glory and the power belong to our God…’

Even though this verse clearly places the great crowd in heaven, they will still insist that the great crowd are on the earth. This clearly shows that they are not following biblical truth, but rather Watchtower doctrine.

In part three next week, we will conclude my visit to the Memorial Meal. We will consider who may partake of the emblems and how a person can show appreciation to Jehovah and Jesus.



[1] The Watchtower, 4/1/79, p. 31

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...