Skip to main content

My Visit to The Memorial Meal of Jehovah's Witnesses

 




I was invited, so I went along. It would have been rude not to. My Jehovah’s Witness friend said: ‘I hope you enjoy the yearly celebration.’

After attending, virtually of course, I cannot say I my overriding emotion was one of joy; I’d rather describe my feelings as ‘disturbed’ and ‘saddened’.

So, what happened?

After the initial introductions a song ‘A Special Possession’ was sung. The lyrics of the song prepares the ground for the soon to be delivered address:

God has a new creation,

His spirit-anointed sons.

He has bought them from mankind;

His approval they’ve won.

 

Faithful to their commission,

They gather the other sheep.

To the Lamb they are loyal.

His commandments they keep.[1]


Noticeably absent from the song was Jesus, the one we had apparently gathered to honour.

The theme for the evening was then announced ‘Appreciate what God and Christ has done for you’ after which the ‘brother’ who was to give the talk was introduced.

He began by reading John 3:16 – the New World Translation version:

“For God loved the world so much that he gave his only-begotten Son, so that everyone exercising faith in him might not be destroyed but have everlasting life.

Christians, who know this verse well, will perhaps notice an extra word in the NWT version. The addition of the word ‘exercising’ reinforces the idea that faith alone is not enough, you need to ‘do something’. In this case the ‘something’ is to be obedient to Jehovah’s organisation.

The brother then spoke about why we were gathered; it is ‘to show appreciation to Jesus who rescued us from sin and death and gave us a future.’  He then read:

Luke 22:19-20 (NWT)

Also, he took a loaf, gave thanks, broke it, and gave it to them, saying: “This means my body, which is to be given in your behalf. Keep doing this in remembrance of me.” Also, he did the same with the cup after they had the evening meal, saying: “This cup means the new covenant by virtue of my blood, which is to be poured out in your behalf.

He then said that Jehovah’s Witnesses gather from around the world to remember what Jesus did for them. Millions[2] attend each year because the memorial is the most important meeting of the year. People attend out of love for what Jesus did for them.

Now the brother said he would address the following four questions during his talk:

1) How does Jesus’ death open the way to everlasting life?

2) Who benefit from Jesus’ loving sacrifice?

3) Who partake of the bread and the wine?

4) Besides attending this meal, what else must we do to show our appreciation?

Let us consider what was given as the answer to these questions.

How does Jesus’ death open the way to everlasting life?

The brother spoke about Adam and the fall, pointing out that through Adam’s disobedience sin entered the world, and sin brought death. Adam’s fall affects each one of us. We are all sinners, and we are separated from God because of this.

To be fair to this ‘brother’, his presentation of the problem facing mankind was thoroughly sound and biblical. I'm afraid I cannot say the same about the solution he presented.

The two greatest acts of love ever shown.

We were told that Jehovah was not willing to leave things as they were so, he initiated two of the greatest acts of love ever shown.

Firstly, Jehovah was willing to send his first-born son to the earth as a perfect man.

When we understand who Jehovah’s Witnesses believe Jesus to be, this does not sound as great an act of love as the Watchtower would have us believe.

The brother said: ‘Jesus was the first thing that Jehovah created.’ Is this true? Is Jesus just a thing? If he is only a created thing, was it really a great hardship for the Almighty God to send him to earth? After all what is this ‘thing’?

According to Jehovah’s Witnesses, Jesus is an angel. Answering the question: ‘Is the Archangel Michael?’ they respond:

Put simply, the answer is yes…. Jesus Christ is Michael the archangel…. So Michael the archangel is Jesus in his prehuman existence. After his resurrection and return to heaven, Jesus resumed his service as Michael, the chief angel, “to the glory of God the Father.”[3]

So, the first thing Jehovah created was an angel. Did Jehovah send an angel to be the second ‘obedient’ Adam? Well apparently, not.

Somehow, when the Holy Spirit overshadows Mary, Michael vanishes. The child born to her is not the Archangel Michael, but rather a sinless human she is to name Jesus. Where did he come from? If he was not Michael, then how was he Jehovah’s first-born son? Was he a further special creation of Jehovah? And where did Jesus, the obedient human, go when, after his resurrection, he ‘resumed his service as Michael’? More importantly, where is any of this in the Bible?

The brother said: ‘We cannot even imagine how close their bond would have been yet, in the greatest act of love, Jehovah sent him.’ Sent who?

Now if we are to believe what the Bible really teaches, that Jesus was the eternal, not created, Son of God who has existed eternally with the Father – then we could appreciate how gut wrenchingly difficult it must have been for both the Father and the Son. This truly is the greatest act of love and we stand in awe of the one who was willing to go to such lengths to save us. He truly deserves our adoration and praise. 

The second greatest act of love ever shown, according to the brother, was that Jesus would be willing to give his life for mankind.

Indeed, this was a great act of love, but only if you have the genuine Jesus. Verses like the ones below are far more meaningful to those who hold to the faith once and for all delivered to the saints:

John 15:13 Greater love has no one than this, that someone lay down his life for his friends.

Romans 5:8 But God shows his love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us.

Historic, biblical Christianity holds that the Lord Jesus Christ was far more that a created angel:

We believe in one God, the Father almighty, maker of heaven and earth, of all things visible and invisible.

And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only Son of God, begotten from the Father before all ages, God from God, Light from Light, true God from true God, begotten, not made; of the same essence as the Father.

Through him all things were made. For us and for our salvation he came down from heaven; he became incarnate by the Holy Spirit and the virgin Mary, and was made human.

He was crucified for us under Pontius Pilate; he suffered and was buried. The third day he rose again, according to the Scriptures.

He ascended to heaven and is seated at the right hand of the Father. He will come again with glory to judge the living and the dead. His kingdom will never end.[4]

The Jesus of Jehovah’s Witnesses is merely a replacement Adam. An obedient perfect human who got right what the the first disobedient perfect human got wrong, but Jesus was far more than that. 

The Bible reveals to us that the perfect man who died on the cross was not merely a perfect human.

Acts 20:28  ‘Pay careful attention to yourselves and to all the flock, in which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers, to care for the church of God, which he obtained with his own blood.’

Jesus was the God-Man. He was fully God and fully man. 

God so loved the world that He shed His own blood! That is what was needed to redeem fallen mankind.

But what, according to Jehovah’s Witnesses, did Jesus’ death truly accomplish? The brother addressed this question by asking us to turn to Romans 5:19 (NWT):

For just as through the disobedience of the one man many were made sinners, so also through the obedience of the one person many will be made righteous.

His comment was that just as through Adam all sin, so through his obedience Jesus ‘passes on the opportunity to live forever.

This, probably unbeknown to the brother, is classic Watchtower eisegesis. The verse must be interpreted through Watchtower glasses.

The verse actually says that many are made righteous, not because of our obedience, but through the obedience of Jesus. But according to The Watchtower, Jesus' death was only to ‘pass an opportunity to live forever’.

For them, Jesus’ death only paid for Adam’s sin and by doing so, he opened the way for obedient humans to possibly live forever. How miserable!

Why did Jesus’ die?

The brother read Hebrews 2 and verse 9:

But we do see Jesus, who was made a little lower than angels, now crowned with glory and honor for having suffered death, so that by God’s undeserved kindness he might taste death for everyone.

He then said:

'Jesus did not die because he was a sinner. He was a perfect man offering a perfect sacrifice. Jesus proved it was possible for a human to be obedient to the point of death. He paid back what Adam lost. Jesus died that we might have life.

But the question is – where?'

Find out his answer next week.



[1] https://www.jw.org/en/library/music-songs/sing-out-joyfully/25-a-special-possession/

[2] It was said that last year 17,844,773 people attended the memorial meal.

[3] “Is Jesus the Archangel Michael?” The Watchtower, 1 April 2010, p.19.

[4] The Nicene Creed


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...