Skip to main content

MY VISIT TO THE MEMORIAL MEAL OF JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES (part 3)


After convincing those listening that they only have an earthly hope, the brother announced the third question:

Who partake of the bread and the wine?

There is no doubt in my mind that what was taught here is thoroughly anti-Christian. Not only is it foreign to the Word of God, to the early church and to Christians for the past 2000 years, it has huge implications for those who, like the Jehovah’s Witnesses, claim to be Christian.

From their founding in the 1870’s through to 1935, the then named ‘Bible Students’ had no problem partaking of the memorial meal. They believed that the Bible taught them that they should. So, what changed?

New Light

The story is told of a young man who was one of the first to hear of the change:

As was true of all Bible Students back then, this sincere young man partook of the bread and the wine each year at the Lord’s Evening Meal. However, his entire outlook on life was changed by a history-making talk entitled “The Great Multitude.” That talk was given in 1935 by J. F. Rutherford at a convention in Washington, D.C., U.S.A. What was revealed at that convention?[1]

In Watchtower parlance J.F.Rutherford had received ‘new light’, and this light was to rob all Jehovah’s Witnesses of their ability to partake in the memorial meal. This new revelation was to replace previously held belief regarding who could partake of the Lord’s Evening Meal.

Rutherford, as the then President of The Watchtower Society, told the convention that only those with a heavenly hope should now partake of the bread and the wine and this has been the teaching followed by Jehovah’s Witnesses ever since.

So it was, as I looked on the screen and saw all those present for this memorial meal, that none of them would partake of the bread and wine before them. When the time came, they literally just passed the bread and wine to each other and then placed them back on their table. How incredibly sad.

The brother began this part of the evening by saying: ’Let us think about the pattern that Jesus left for us.’ He then read 1 Corinthians 11:23-25 (NWT)

For I received from the Lord what I also handed on to you, that the Lord Jesus on the night on which he was going to be betrayed took a loaf, and after giving thanks, he broke it and said: “This means my body, which is in your behalf. Keep doing this in remembrance of me. He did the same with the cup also, after they had the evening meal, saying: “This cup means the new covenant by virtue of my blood. Keep doing this, whenever you drink it, in remembrance of me.”

We were told that when Paul spoke these words, he was only speaking to the believers at Corinth. They were the first to be part of the 144,000. So, whilst everyone in the Church at Corinth would literally partake of the emblems, we could not. We, not being of the ‘chosen for heaven’ group, can only observe the emblems, but we should definitely not partake. 

Nowhere can this teaching be gleaned from Paul’s words or the practice of the early church. In fact, reading 1 Corinthians 11 in its entire context reveals that partaking of the bread and wine is for all Christians ‘until he comes.’

The brother said that we were to think about, and imitate, the pattern Jesus left for us. What I experienced at the Memorial Meal was a poor imitation and nothing like the pattern Jesus set. This was devoid of any life and truth. So incredibly sad.

What a simple yet profound ceremony!

This is what the brother said at the conclusion of the ‘passing’ of the emblems.

At the beginning of the meeting, I noticed a couple of ladies appearing to be shedding a tear as the image of Jesus on a torture stake.

Seeing Jesus dying in agony for the sin of the world is indeed moving. The idea that the God who created us would sacrifice his only begotten Son to redeem sinful humanity should move us to contrition and contemplation.

As the brother was about to address our final question of the evening, he reminded us that the Memorial Meal was all about love. It was love that made Jehovah send his son to give us a second chance and it was love that caused Jesus to willing die for us. So here is the question:

Besides attending this meal, what else must we do to show our appreciation?

This final question sought to keep the already convinced in line and the yet to be convinced convicted. How could we, after all we had just heard, not want to truly show our appreciation to Jehovah and Jesus. But how?

The brother was not slow to offer suggestions. We should seek to get to know Jehovah and to understand His likes and dislikes. Find out what pleases him and seek to follow his standards. Then pour your heart out to Jehovah.

Notice how he began by saying we are to show our appreciation to Jehovah and Jesus, but then he refers constantly to Jehovah. He exhorted us to thank Jehovah and think about what our life would be like without him. The greater we show our appreciation the more we show we love him.

He told us that the best way to show our appreciation is to regularly attend meetings. We should associate with those who love Jehovah and participate in Bible readings and studies. He concluded by reading 2 Corinthians 5:14-15:

For the love the Christ has compels us, because this is what we have concluded, that one man died for all; so, then, all had died. And he died for all so that those who live should live no longer for themselves, but for him who died for them and was raised up.

Are we compelled to show appreciation to Jehovah and Jesus?

He pointed out that true appreciation for all that Jehovah and Jesus has done for us, should be shown by associating with God’s organisation. Why? Because only Jehovah’s Witnesses have the truth, only they are obedient to Jehovah, only by meeting with them, studying the Bible with them and being baptised as a faithful witness of Jehovah can one truly be appreciative of all that has been done for them.

In conclusion, attending the Memorial Meal of Jehovah’s Witnesses, was a little like being invited to a birthday party to look at the cake. There was little joy, nothing to taste and really nothing to see. My heart goes out to those trapped in this false version of Christianity. Lord have mercy upon them.



[1] https://www.jw.org/finder?srcid=jwlshare&wtlocale=E&prefer=lang&docid=2021241&par=0


 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...