Skip to main content

Watch the Tower: Equality in the Godhead?

 


Continuing our look at the Trinity, we find in the Reasoning book p. 210 the Watch Tower continues to address the question:

'Does the Bible teach that none of those who are said to be included in the Trinity is greater or less than another, that all are equal, that all are almighty?'

They comment on the gospel text in Matt. 20:20-23, RS:

The mother of the sons of Zebedee . . . said to him [Jesus], ‘Command that these two sons of mine may sit, one at your right hand and one at your left, in your kingdom.’ But Jesus answered, . . . ‘You will drink my cup, but to sit at my right hand and at my left is not mine to grant, but it is for those for whom it has been prepared by my Father.’” They go on:

(How strange, if, as claimed, Jesus is God! Was Jesus here merely answering according to his “human nature”? If, as Trinitarians say, Jesus was truly “God-man”—both God and man, not one or the other—would it truly be consistent to resort to such an explanation? Does not Matthew 20:23 rather show that the Son is not equal to the Father, that the Father has reserved some prerogatives for himself?)'

The evidence seems clear enough, Jesus cannot be equal to the Father since he cannot grant what the Father can.

God the Son and the God-Man Jesus

Later in Matthew’s gospel we have Jesus clearly declaring, ‘All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me…’ (Mt.28:18). It seems clear that Jesus’ authority here is derived. From whom? From the Father (Jn.3:35). This appears to strengthen the case for Jesus not being equal to God the Father. Does this mean Jesus didn’t previously have this authority?

John writes, ‘In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through him, and without him was not anything made that was made. In him was life, and the life was the light of men.’ (Jn.1:1-4) I want to point out three things:

The Word was God.’ I know Jehovah’s Witnesses translate, ‘the Word was a god,’ but there is no warrant for doing this. See here.

...without him was not anything made that was made.’ The New World Translation has, ‘...apart from him not even one thing came into existence.’ If the Word was a created being this statement would be false. If he is created, albeit before everything else, one thing would have come into existence before the Word created everything else.

In him was life, and the life was the light of men.’ The New Word Translation inexcusably gives us, ‘by means of him was life, and the life was the light of men.’ The literal translation of these words in their own Kingdom Interlinear is, ‘in him life was.’ Contrary to JW claims, this life was not derived but was integral, in the very nature of the Word.

If this is the case, then why is Jesus’ authority derived? Because God the Son exists eternally, having life and authority in himself. The God-man Jesus did not exist eternally, but had a beginning into which God the Son stepped, becoming incarnate.

God the Son existed eternally with the Father and the Spirit, in perfect and equal union. The God-man Jesus walked a journey from his birth, through his baptism and effectual calling, crucifixion, death, and resurrection, to be raised eternally to the place at the right hand of the throne of God. Here ‘all authority in heaven and on earth’ was given to him.

The extent of his authority is absolute, ‘all authority.’ We see this when we see his role as creator of all things (Jn.1:3); upholder of all things (Heb.1:3); his holding all things together (Col.1:17); his absolute authority over nature (Lk.8:25); over Satan and all his demons (Mk.1:27); his triumph over death (1 Cor.15:54-58); his role as ‘King of kings’ (Rev.17:14)

Before the World Existed

In his high priestly prayer in John’s gospel Jesus says, addressing the Father:

I glorified you on earth, having accomplished the work that you gave me to do. And now, Father, glorify me in your own presence with the glory that I had with you before the world existed.’ (Jn.17:4,5)

Paul writes of Jesus in Philippians:

...though he was in the form of God, [he] did not consider equality with God a thing to be grasped, but made himself nothing,, taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of man.’ (Philip.2:6,7)

The Watch Tower translates, did not even consider the idea of trying to be equal to God.’ This only raises the question, of what then did he empty himself? If he was a creature he could only empty himself of his creaturely nature. The correct translation stands, in no small part because of all we have said so far.

Earlier Paul describes Christ’s glorification, seated at the right hand of God:

...in the heavenly places, far above all rule and authority and power and dominion, and above every name that is named, not only in this age but also in the one to come. And put all things under his feet and gave him as head over all things to the church, which is his body, the fullness of him who fills all in all.’ (Philip.120-23)

All rule, all authority, all power, all dominion, all things under his feet, all things to the church, who fills all in all. This is the glory to which he was raised and the answer to his prayer in John 17, glorify me in your own presence with the glory that I had with you before the world existed.’

This is the God-man Jesus returning to that place from which God the Son came ‘to redeem us from all lawlessness and to purify for himself a people for his own possession who are zealous for good works.’ (Titus 2:14)

Oh, give thanks to the LORD, for he is good, for his steadfast love endures forever! Let the redeemed of the LORD say so, whom he has redeemed from the hand of the enemy…’

(Ps.107:1,2)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

The Times of the Gentiles - by Dawn Partington

Jehovah's Witnesses teach that “the times of the gentiles” is a time period of 2,520 years, beginning in 607BC and ending in AD1914. According to their doctrine, Jesus was enthroned as King in AD1914 when the “gentile times” ended. 1. Only one verse in scripture mentions “the times of the gentiles”: 'They will fall by the sword and will be taken as prisoners to all the nations. Jerusalem will be trampled on by the Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled.'  Luke 21:24 NIV. The Jehovah's Witness organisation has linked this one verse with other prophetic passages to calculate the supposed length of these “gentile times”, notably a time period which began hundreds of years before the incarnation and ended over 1900 years after it. 2. Simple examination of the text of Luke 21 reveals what Jesus was referring to when he used the phrase “the times of the gentiles”. Let's look at the passage together and distil this into four points which you may...

Resurrection or Cloning?

  In the film “The Sixth Day”, based in the near future where cloning of pets is allowed but not of humans, the main character, Adam, played by Arnold Schwarzenegger, wakes up in a taxi, not knowing how he got there.   He travels home only to see another man inside with his family; this man looks exactly like him.   Before being able to confront the imposter, Adam is attacked by unknown assailants and has to run.   This being an Arnie movie there are lots of shoot outs and the body count is high as Adam attempts to find out what is going on. It turns out that he has been cloned and the cloning company is trying to clear up the loose ends.   Spoiler alert; it turns out he is the clone and the other Adam is the original.   The story highlights some problems with the Watchtower’s ideas about ‘resurrection’.   They teach that, at death, who we are ceases to exist; there is no soul or spirit that survives death, nothing of our essence continues on. ...