Skip to main content

Misinformation and The Jehovah’s Witnesses (Part 1)



I am not a massive cricket fan, but I do enjoy the odd test match and, of course, the Ashes. I find the battle the battle between the batsman and the bowler fascinating. The bowler seeks to tempt the batsman into playing a shot that will lead to his dismissal, but every now and then the bowler will not quite get it right, giving the batsman the opportunity to hit the ball for six.

Now lest you fear the Reachout Trust blog has decided to ditch cults and start commenting on sport, let me share with you where I am going with this. Every now and then a cultic group, like the bowler in the cricket match, will give the batsman (in this case Reachout Trust) the opportunity to hit the ball for six.

This is what the Jehovah’s Witnesses have done in their feature article on JW.org. The piece is entitled: ‘Protect Yourself from Misinformation’ and, as I began to read it, I nearly spat out my coffee. If only Jehovah’s Witnesses would take what they are here being taught and apply it to their own leaders and teachings. Let’s consider the advice they are being offered.

We all need to protect ourselves from misinformation.

So begins the article and they are correct. This is sound advice. So, what does JW.org suggests Witnesses should do? They offer four pointers:

i) Do not believe everything you see or hear

ii) Evaluate the source and content

iii) Be guided by facts, not personal preferences

iv) Stop the spread of misinformation

Again, this is all good, but those reading this will completely fail to spot the irony.

Here we have guidance coming from an organisation which tells its members not to believe or trust anything coming from outside of their group. That they have no need to check or evaluate anything they are being taught, because the Faithful and Discreet Slave is to be completely trusted. And what about being guided by facts? Have you ever tried to have a Jehovah’s Witness check the fact that Jerusalem fell to Babylon in 586/7 BCE and not 607BCE?

Types of Misinformation

It continues to warn Jehovah’s Witnesses about misleading news, false reports, and conspiracy theories. Then, in another ‘spit the drink out of my mouth moment’ the article quotes the secretary- general of the UN.

For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, the secretary-general of the United Nations warned of a dangerous epidemic of misinformation. “Harmful health advice and snake-oil solutions are proliferating,” he stated. “Falsehoods are filling the airwaves. Wild conspiracy theories are infecting the Internet. Hatred is going viral, stigmatizing and vilifying people and groups.”

It does make me smile when I find the Watchtower Society quoting the United Nations, after all here is what it thinks of that organisation:

The UN really stands in the way of God’s Kingdom by the “seed” of Abraham. Hence, it is the present-day “disgusting thing that causes desolation.” (Matthew 24:15) No, the UN is not a blessing, even though the religious clergy of Christendom and the rabbis of Jewry pray heaven’s blessing upon that organization. It is really “the image of the wild beast,” the visible political, commercial organization of “the god of this system of things,” Satan the Devil. So the UN will soon be destroyed along with that beastly organization.[1]

This was before it was revealed in 2001 that the Watchtower had had a nine-year relationship with the UN as a Non-Governmental Organisation. After accusing the clergy of Christendom of spiritual fornication with the kings of the earth – they were found guilty of the same!

They go on to say that misinformation is not new, and this is true. For example, the Watchtower Society has been spreading misinformation regarding the way of salvation for the past 150 years. They quote 2 Timothy 3:1,13, not realising that these verses speak about them.

But know this, that in the last days critical times hard to deal with will be here… But wicked men and impostors will advance from bad to worse, misleading and being misled. (NWT)

The Internet

It is pointed out that the internet can be a source of misinformation as…’our email, social media, and news feeds can become filled with distorted facts and half-truths’.

This is their way of telling their members not to believe anything they may see or read on the internet, particularly if it is speaking about Jehovah’s organisation. The question is posed: ‘How can you protect yourself from misleading information and conspiracy theories?’

My answer would be to stop listening to anything the Faithful and Discreet Slave tells them, but of course that is not their answer. They say: ‘Do not believe everything you see or hear.’ Followed by the Bible verse:

“The naïve person believes every word, but the shrewd one ponders each step.” Proverbs 14:15

In a recent encounter with Jehovah’s Witnesses at their cart, I shared my testimony and why I believed they were in grave danger. After showing that I had clearly done thinking, some fact checking and some research, they no longer wanted to speak to me. This seems to be the exact opposite of Proverbs 14:15.

The Jehovah’s Witnesses are looking for ‘naïve’ people who will believe their every word without question. They have no time for the ‘shrewd’ who will ponder each step. In a further show of blind irony, the article continues by saying: ‘We can easily be deceived if we are not careful’.

They then reference videos and images that can be ‘taken out of context’. Jehovah’s Witnesses are given some wise counsel in this regard. They are to evaluate the source and content. In this they would be wise to follow the biblical advice of 1 Thessalonians 5:21 to ‘Make sure of all things’ which, ironically, they quote out of context! If only Jehovah’s Witnesses would really make sure of ALL things.

Next time we will continue to respond to Misinformation and the Jehovah's Witnesses.





[1] The Watchtower, September 15, 1984, p. 15

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...