Skip to main content

Misinformation and The Jehovah’s Witnesses (Part 2)

 




Last time I began to respond to an article on JW.org entitled: ‘Protect Yourself from Misinformation’. I suggested that, though the advice given was generally sound, they need to take the counsel and apply it to Jehovah's organisation.

The article continues by encouraging Jehovah's people to ‘evaluate the reliability of the source' saying that:

News media companies and other organizations may slant a story because of their commercial or political bias.

This really is an article that just keeps on giving. This could just have easily said: ‘The Watchtower organization may slant a story because of their commercial and theological bias.’

Let’s Agree

Now, I do find myself agreeing with some of the advice given in the article. For example, they say: 'Compare what you see in one news outlet with other sources'. I agree. Yes, we should.

'At times, friends may inadvertently pass on misinformation through email messages or social media posts. Therefore, do not trust a news item unless you can check the original source'. Yes, I agree.

'Make sure that the content is current and accurate. Look for dates, verifiable facts, and strong evidence to support what is being said'. Yes, I totally agree.

They then add in another quote from a U.N. correspondent:

“Fact-checking now is probably becoming as important as hand washing.” says: Sridhar Dharmapuri, a Senior Food Safety and Nutrition Officer for the U.N.

Be guided by facts, not personal preferences.

If only they would seriously apply the advice, they are being given. Jehovah’s Witnesses are not guided by facts – they fear facts. They refuse to consider any proofs presented to them, because they are conditioned to just trust what they are told by Jehovah’s organisation and it would never lie to them.

Again they quote another bible verse to support their point:

“Whoever trusts in his own heart is stupid.” Proverbs 28:26 (NWT)

It is worth looking at the whole verse, here quoted from the NKJV:

He who trusts in his own heart is a fool, but whoever walks wisely will be delivered. Proverbs 28:26

We know that the heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked[1], so we mustn’t trust our heart, but the proverb also says we are to walk wisely. How is this achieved? By fact checking everything we are being told – even by the faithful and discreet slave!

The article then says something so true, yet the Jehovah’s Witnesses would never believe that it could apply to them.

‘We tend to trust information that confirms what we want to believe’.

Now, I have no problem with putting my hand up and saying I am sometimes guilty of this, surely, we all are. Yet the JW would no doubt say: ‘Not me’.

Continuing, the article rightly points out that our social media feeds will offer us information based on our interests and browsing history. They then quote someone named Peter Ditto, a social psychologist:

“People are capable of being thoughtful and rational, but our wishes, hopes, fears, and motivations often tip the scales to make us more likely to accept something as true if it supports what we want to believe.”

They then ask: ‘Do I trust this information just because it is what I want to believe?’ I would say the answer is yes for some and always yes for all Jehovah’s Witnesses.

Stop the spread of misinformation

Finally, the article gives advice on how to stop the spread of misinformation. My advice to them is to just stay of our streets, but I trust they would not readily accept my guidance. Yet, they quote Exodus 23:1 (NWT), which clearly agrees with my advice to them:

“You must not spread a report that is not true”

They then say something that is again true and clearly pointing at themselves:

‘Remember that the information you share with others has the power to affect their thoughts and actions. Even if you unintentionally pass on wrong information, the consequences can be harmful.’

How damaging is the ‘wrong’ information given out by Jehovah’s Witnesses. I am reminded of Jesus’ words at Matthew 23:13:

“But woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you shut the kingdom of heaven in people's faces. For you neither enter yourselves nor allow those who would enter to go in…”

Sadly, their message can neither save themselves nor anyone else. What a tragedy.

They end with a quote from yet another ‘worldly’ source:

“The No. 1 rule is to slow down, pause and ask yourself, ʻAm I sure enough about this that I should share it?’ If everybody did that, we’d see a dramatic reduction of misinformation online.”— Peter Adams, a senior vice president of the News Literacy Project.

The question is then posed to the loyal followers of Jehovah:

‘Am I sharing this information because I know it is true?’

This is not just a question about the spread of misinformation online, but also about their confidence in sharing what they believe as Jehovah’s Witnesses. They believe they are in the ‘truth’ (Jehovah’s organisation), yet they do not know the One who is the Truth.

Whilst they continue to deny the person of the Lord Jesus and reject what He has done for them, they will continue to spread misinformation

If only they would heed the advice given in the article on JW.org and apply it to the organisation, but they cannot. Rather they continue to believe that which supports what they want to believe and so they remain lost and without hope.



[1] Jeremiah 17:9


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...