The question is, which church name would he have us use given the name has changed so much over the years. Instead of Mormonism should we call it, ‘The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints-ism?’
I would point out the current Mormon prophet, M Russell Nelson, has point-blank contradicted the policy of his immediate predecessor, Thomas S Monson. Perhaps Mormons should look closer to home and have the Mormon Church do some housekeeping. The various names of the church have been:The Church of Christ - 1830
The
Church of the Latter Day Saints - 1834
The Church of Jesus
Christ - Joseph Smith, History of the Church, 3:24, footnote
The Church of God - ibid
The Church of Christ of Latter Day
Saints - Encyclopedia of Mormonism, p.979
The Church of Jesus
Christ of Latter-day Saints - Book of Mormon, frontispiece, 1966 ed.
The Mormon Church - Thomas S Monson: see the article here.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints - M Russell Ballard
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, or Latter-day Saints for short - website
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints on first reference, ‘the Church,’ or ‘the Church of Jesus Christ’ for short, then a complicated list of rules – website
You can read a fuller account here.
It was so much easier in the first
century.
‘The disciples were first called Christians
in Antioch’ Acts 11:26
The problem the Mormon Church has is it
wants to be identified squarely with those first called Christians in
Antioch, while at the same time seeking to identify and highlight
distinctives. ‘Mormonism’ is a great distinctive, but doesn’t
identify ‘Christians,’ while ‘Christians’ identifies
‘followers of the Way’ Acts 24:14 but certainly doesn’t
highlight distinctives.
The most honest thing I ever heard
a Mormon leader say came from Gordon B Hinckley, president of the
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 1995-2008’
“The traditional Christ of whom
they (the Christian churches) speak is not the Christ of whom I
speak,” (baptistpress.com)
Of
course, the church back-pedalled furiously on this, doing its usual
firefighting after another public pronouncement by G B Hinckley.
Clearly, distinctives are important. I suggest ‘Mormon’ is not such a bad distinctive. After all, it all started with that book and it still stands as the book of the ‘Restoration,’ while the Bible is notably the book of the apostasy.
As for our ministry we, like so many in the ministry, will continue to use nouns and pronouns that make the distinction. Who knows but that a future Mormon president will change back to ‘My name is [fill the blank] and I am a Mormon.’ That would put us ahead of the game it seems to me.
And, after all, neither we nor members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints would want people to make the mistake of identifying Mormons as just another denomination standing in the long line of denominational Christianity in the past two-thousand years.
Heaven forfend!
Comments