Skip to main content

THE TRUTH ABOUT MORMONISM

 

Pictured here is Mormon church leader Bradley R. Wilcox. He is speaking at a Fireside Youth gathering in February 2022. He surely did not know that as he spoke to the young people that evening, his message would go viral and cause outrage. There was such a backlash to his lesson that he quickly had to issue an apology. What did he say that caused such an offence? Was he speaking untruth and misrepresenting the Mormon church and its teaching? Was he bringing the church into disrepute? Over the next few weeks, I will review his message and seek to answer the question: Did Brad Wilcox speak the truth about Mormonism?

Who is Bradley R. Wilcox?

On the LDS website we read:

Bradley R. Wilcox was born in Provo, Utah, on December 25, 1959. He and his wife, Deborah Gunnell, have four children. He received his bachelor’s and master’s degrees from Brigham Young University (BYU) and his doctorate in education from the University of Wyoming. He has served in several Church callings, including full-time missionary in the Chile Vina del Mar Mission, bishop, mission president of the Chile Santiago East Mission, counsellor in a YSA stake presidency, and member of the Sunday School general board. Most recently, he served as high councillor and stake Young Men president.

He is currently a professor in BYU’s Department of Ancient Scripture. He is the author of the book The Continuous Atonement and the BYU devotional address “His Grace Is Sufficient.”[1]

As we read about ‘Brad’, as he calls himself, we find that he is thoroughly Mormon. This is important to note from the outset as we begin to dissect his so called ‘controversial’ message. Brad is not a Mormon lone ranger. Someone invited to the Fireside to offer a personal view. No, Brad is a bone fide, thoroughly sold out for Joseph Smith, leader within the church.

Setting the Scene

After welcoming everyone to the meeting, the young lady who was leading announced the opening hymn: We Thank Thee, O God, for a Prophet. Here are the opening lyrics:

We thank thee, O God, for a prophet.

To guide us in these latter days.

We thank thee for sending the gospel.

 To lighten our minds with its rays.

 

Nothing too controversial here for a Mormon gathering to sing. They believe that God sent the prophet Joseph Smith to guide and restore the only true church, and that they alone have the fullness of the gospel. This hymn then was not only in line with Mormon doctrine but was totally compatible with the message about to be delivered. I am often asked to choose a hymn that fits with my message, and it may be that Brad had been asked to do the same.

Getting Down with the Kids

After the hymn, and a piano solo, Brad got up to speak. Clearly used to speaking to youth, he sought to get down to their level.

He told them that though some of their peers may be leaving the church, such ones cannot leave the issues of life which are common to all. They will still face troubles and heartache – but they will no longer have the blessings of the church to help them through the difficult times they will surely face. What are these blessings?

Brad said that the Mormon church had six doctrines that cannot be found anywhere else. He said that some leave ‘other’ churches and not miss that much, but if you leave the Mormon church you miss everything.

In teaching them the things that Mormon Church have which others do not, he used an acrostic to help them remember his message. The acrostic was formed of the word ‘Gospel’

The Gospel

An acrostic can be a useful teaching aid. In teaching the gospel, I too have used an acrostic. Here is an example of something I have used:

GOD – created us to be in relationship with Him.

OUR – sin has broken our relationship with Him.

SIN – cannot be removed by our good works.

PAYING – the price for sin, Jesus died and rose again.

EVERYONE – who repents and puts faith in Jesus has eternal life.

LIFE - with Jesus starts now and lasts forever.

This acrostic lays out the essence of the gospel as believed upon and taught by historic Christianity. Is the content of my acrostic in any way similar to the one used by Mormon leader Brad Wilcox?

The Mormon Gospel

Brad laid the foundation for his acrostic by saying that the Mormon church has six doctrines that cannot be found in ‘other’ churches. His acrostic was to point to each of these doctrines. Here, in a nutshell, is what he said:

Godhead – Heavenly Father, Jesus and the Holy Spirit are individual beings.

Only True Church – The Mormon Church alone has the fulness of the gospel.

Spirit – The Mormon Church alone has the gift of the Holy Ghost.

Priesthood – The Mormon Church alone has authority.

Everyone – The Mormon Church alone offers salvation to everyone – even the dead.

Living Prophets – The Mormon Church alone has prophets equal to Peter, James and John.

In using this acrostic with the youth, Brad Wilcox laid out what makes Mormonism distinct from historic Christianity. He said nothing that wasn’t already known by his hearers that evening, so why the controversy?

Unpacking Mormonism

It wasn’t his acrostic that caused offence, but rather his application of these six, unique to Mormons, doctrines. Over the next few weeks, I will take a look at what he said and ask if he was being true to Mormonism.

 


 


Comments

Bro Wilcox speaks the truth about the Restored Gospel and Church of Jesus Christ.

therefore, because you and all of ROT are bigots that do now know or understand the Holy Bible you try to make a meal of him.

Is this what ROT has become? If so, then ROT's endgame is in sight.

Doug must be turning over in his grave.

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...