Skip to main content

Jehovah's Organisation?

 



On their website the Watch Tower asks, 'Is it Necessary to Belong to an Organised Religion?

In Reasoning from the Scriptures (pp. 283/4) Jehovah's Witnesses offer seven characteristics that identify Jehovah's organisation:


(1) It truly exalts Jehovah as the only true God, magnifying his name.—Matt. 4:10; John 17:3.

(2) It fully recognizes the vital role of Jesus Christ in Jehovah’s purpose—as the vindicator of Jehovah’s sovereignty, the Chief Agent of life, the head of the Christian congregation, the ruling Messianic King.—Rev. 19:11-13; 12:10; Acts 5:31; Eph. 1:22, 23.

(3) It adheres closely to God’s inspired Word, basing all its teachings and standards of conduct on the Bible.—2 Tim. 3:16, 17.

(4) It keeps separate from the world.—Jas. 1:27; 4:4.

(5) It maintains a high level of moral cleanness among its members, because Jehovah himself is holy.—1 Pet. 1:15, 16; 1 Cor. 5:9-13.

(6) It devotes its principal efforts to doing the work that the Bible foretold for our day, namely, the preaching of the good news of God’s Kingdom in all the world for a witness.—Matt. 24:14.

(7) Despite human imperfections, its members cultivate and produce the fruits of God’s spirit—love, joy, peace, long-suffering, kindness, goodness, faith, mildness, self-control—doing so to such a degree that it sets them apart from the world in general.—Gal. 5:22, 23; John 13:35.


A fundamental claim of every cult is they are the only ones with the truth. They are organised like the first century church, they have 'restored' what was lost in apostasy, and their organisational structure is evidence of these things.

Is organisation evidence of authenticity? Is there a difference being an organisation and being organised? How does your church match up to the list?

The problem with this approach is it takes more from the text than is actually there. Compare two cults and see what I mean.

The Watch Tower Society has a Governing Body sitting at the top of the organisation. When they look at the New Testament they see a Governing Body sitting in judgement in the Jerusalem Council in Acts 15.

The Mormon Church would argue the leadership of the Jehovah’s Witnesses looks nothing like the leadership in the New Testament. They would ask why the Watch Tower Society doesn’t have twelve members on its Governing Body, and why are they not apostles and prophets as described in Ephesians 4. You can see their point.

Of course each party would have an answer to questions on leadership, each appealing to passages in Scripture. But the church is an organism not an organisation. You can read something about what church is in Cults and Messy Church on the Reachout website.


Point by Point

Starting with starting with their last point:

(7) Despite human imperfections, its members cultivate and produce the fruits of God’s spirit—love, joy, peace, long-suffering, kindness, goodness, faith, mildness, self-control—doing so to such a degree that it sets them apart from the world in general.—Gal. 5:22, 23; John 13:35.

This is an important point. If Jehovah’s Witnesses think it reasonable that we should allow for their human imperfections surely they must respond to us in kind. We are far from perfect, and there will always be those who go by the name Christian who prove to be anything but. There will also be those who ‘produce the fruits of God’s spirit—love, joy, peace, long-suffering, kindness, goodness, faith, mildness, self-control—doing so to such a degree that it sets them apart from the world in general.’ Will Witnesses recognise, indeed celebrate that?

(1) On their first point, do Christians magnify God’s name if we don’t use it? Jesus never used God’s name, no matter how much JWs insist ‘he must have’ on the strength of Matthew 6 and John 17. Further, he taught his disciples to call God Father (Mt.6:9). How did he ‘make God’s name known’ (Jn.17:6,26) if he didn’t utter it? By making God’s character known: ‘whoever has seen me has seen the Father.’ (Jn.14:9) In Jesus, God has a good name. As a church it is our duty to give God a good name before a watching world.

(2) I have never known a genuine Christian believer who fails to recognise Jesus’ role in God’s purposes. Indeed we make more of him than Jehovah’s Witnesses do (Jn.1:1; Jn.14:9; Heb.1).

(3) Christians adhere faithfully to the word of God in the Bible. In fact, our Bibles are much more true to the originals than the NWT, which has a decided translation bias. Read more here.

(4) Christians keep separate from the world, although not in the paranoid manner of the cults. We are in the world but not of the world. Read this great article by John Piper to see where the balance lies.

(5) Christian churches maintain a high level of moral cleanness among its members, because God himself is holy and a called out people are to be holy. Are they suggesting my Christian friends don’t seek holiness before the Lord? Might this be a good time to mention child abuse in Kingdom Halls and their point 7? People in glass house...

(6) It devotes its principal efforts to doing the work that the Bible foretold for our day, namely, the preaching of the good news of God’s Kingdom in all the world for a witness.—Matt. 24:14. I have a quarrel with this one, not because it’s completely wrong but because it’s incomplete. Four chapters on in Matthew’s gospel we find Jesus describing the rest of this rescue mission – making disciples (Mt.28:16-20)

It is sad that the Kingdom Hall fails ,in this fundamental duty, to win people and then to bring them into the community to grow them into well-rounded Christian individuals. It seems to me they bring them in, drum doctrine into them, in order to do little more than send them out again and ill-equipped for the task in my experience.

How great is the good news we have to share with Jehovah's Witnesses, about Christ, about God's purposes in a new creation, about the assurance true disciples can have because of God's promises in the Bible (John 5:24)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Cheers!

  In their latest update #4, the Jehovah’s Witnesses' Governing Body has announced that toasting and ‘ clinking glasses’  is now allowed at the individual Jehovah’s Witness’s ‘ bible trained conscience’ .  This, Governing Body member Stephen Lett tells us, is due to ‘ prayerful consideration’  by the Governing Body.  This doesn’t sound unreasonable; who could possibly object to toasting, it’s such an innocuous custom?  The answer to that is the Governing Body itself, until now. Ever since 1952, and possibly earlier, the Watchtower has roundly condemned this practice due to its ‘ pagan roots’  in ‘ false religion’ .  The 15 May 1952 Watchtower (page 319), has this to say on the matter Jehovah God and Christ Jesus are not honored by having pagan customs of toasting switched to them, or to human s In 1968, in an answer to  Questions from Readers,  the 1 Jan Watchtower states If a Christian is going to make a request f...

The Mormon God’s Dysfunctional Family

You know those moments when you look at something you’ve looked at a thousand times before and suddenly see something new? I was looking at a blog I found via the Google Blog Alerts service and it told the familiar story of the Mormon “ Plan of Salvation”; you can read it here. There really was nothing surprising until I started thinking about what people might think if a family they knew conducted themselves the way the Mormon “family of God” do in this story. People from abusive backgrounds have problems enough with the idea of God as a Father but this story would put anyone off the idea forever! As I recount this story think about what the typical dad would do as his kids are growing up and compare it with this “exalted man.” According to Mormonism “ God created our spirits” and we lived with him in a pre-mortal existence (Mormons say “pre-existence” but it is not possible to pre-exist, i.e. to exist before you exist. The noun “existence” has to be have the prefix “pre” othe...