Skip to main content

What do you Call God Mr JW?



Last week, on the Facebook page, I wrote about a discussion I had recently with a Jehovah’s Witness. The name of God inevitably came up. This issue has been done to death, I know, the usual texts thrown back and forth (what Doug Harris would call ‘Wimbledon witnessing’).

He came up with the usual argument from Matthew 6, the idea in the Lord’s Prayer that we should sanctify the name. I pointed out, as I always do, that Jesus didn’t use the name in praying, to which he replied:

‘You don’t use his name when you are addressing your father.’

I must agree with him. I never used my father’s name, neither have my children used mine in addressing me.

Jason Michael Learner, in the Facebook discussion, wrote:

‘To be fair, there are loads of names for God, Elohim, El Shaddai, LORD and each of these tell us something about His character and personal attributes. Abba is another example, it shows us something about the nature of God's character and the type of relationship that not only Jesus had with Him, but also the type of relationship we can have with Him, through Jesus.’

Michael goes on to observe the focus of Matthew 6 is how we live in relation to God, asking, ‘Is it for show, to make us look important and holy, or do we do our deeds in secret where only God will know about them - this is more pleasing to Him than trying to please or impress the world.’

It’s a great point and maybe sanctifying God’s name has more to do with how we live in His name in this world than whether we use his name in prayer, in conversation. Curiously, God’s words to Abraham and Moses confirm Michael’s point.


Moses

It is in Exodus 3 that God reveals his name:

'This is what you are to say to the Israelites, ‘Jehovah the God of your forefathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, has sent me to you.’ This is my name forever, and this is how I am to be remembered from generation to generation.’ (Ex.3:15, NWT)

God goes on in Exodus 6 to say:

'I am Jehovah. And I used to appear to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob as God Almighty, but with regard to my name Jehovah I did not make myself known to them.’ (Ex.6:2-3, NWT)

To the patriarchs, then, God was not known as Jehovah but as ‘God Almighty,’ the Hebrew El-Shaddai.’


Abraham

In the Genesis account of Abraham’s call to sacrifice his son Isaac (Gen.22), you will remember, the LORD staid Abraham’s hand, providing a ram caught in a thicket for the sacrifice instead. Abraham went on to call that place, ‘the LORD will provide,’ in the Hebrew Jehovah Jireh Even earlier, in Genesis 15, God gives Abraham his name, ‘And the LORD said to him, ‘I am Jehovah who brought you out of Ur of the Chaldeans…’ (Gen.15:17, NWT)

A Puzzle

We have Jesus in John’s gospel insisting he has made known God’s name, when in fact he never used the name. Now we have God telling Moses in Exodus that the patriarchs didn’t know God as ‘the LORD’ or Jehovah, when Abraham clearly knew the name. Two questions present themselves:


Is there an explanation for these apparent contradictions?


How does it help us think about how we sanctify God’s name?

What's in a Name? (so much it turns out)

In Bible times names reflected character. Abraham means father of a multitude, David means beloved, Jesus is the Greek form of Yeshua, meaning ‘Yahweh (Jehovah) is salvation.’ The answer to our questions is tied up with the relationship of God with Abraham and with Moses respectively, how much of himself, or what part of his character, God revealed to each man.

Alec Motyer, in his Bible Speaks Today commentary on Exodus explains:

‘Abraham and the other patriarchs knew Yahweh only as one way of identifying El Shaddai, but as yet no distinctive revelation of God had been attached to it. Its meaning was not revealed until Moses.’

In other words, for Abraham, Jehovah was the name of El Shaddai, God Almighty, but that name did not yet carry the significance it subsequently carried for Moses and Israel.

In Genesis El Shaddai, God Almighty, is sufficient to meet his people’s needs in particular circumstances.

In Exodus Jehovah is revealed as the God who goes with his people.

Motyer, again, explains:

‘In Genesis 17:1 Yahweh said to Abraham, ‘I am El Shaddai’ and this is typical of Genesis in that the God who is called Yahweh is known as El Shaddai, the God who is sufficient. Here (in Exodus), however, the situation is reversed and El Shaddai says, ‘I am Yahweh.’ (Ex.6:2-3) This sufficient God is about to redefine his sufficiency.’

Indeed, the name Yahweh is used only when the Bible is talking about God’s relationship with his people. The relatively remote God of Abraham, El Shaddai, the God who is God, becomes the relational God of Israel, Jehovah, the covenant keeping, unchanging God who is among his people. The God who is here.

Michael’s point is well made when he writes:

‘Abba shows us something about the nature of God's character and the type of relationship that not only Jesus had with Him, but also the type of relationship we can have with Him, through Jesus.’

It’s about relationship, who he is to us, who we are to him. Which brings me back to Jesus words in Matthew 6:9. The Jehovah’s Witness confidently asserted, ‘You don’t use his name when you are addressing your father,’ to explain Jesus’ use of ‘Father’ here. However, while it is true Jesus was addressing his Father in prayer on other occasions, notably John 17, here Jesus is teaching his disciples how they should pray, ‘This then is how you should pray, Our Father…’

When you have a moment you would profit from reading Romans 8:12-17

See also Sanctifying God’s Name on the Reachout website




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

The Times of the Gentiles - by Dawn Partington

Jehovah's Witnesses teach that “the times of the gentiles” is a time period of 2,520 years, beginning in 607BC and ending in AD1914. According to their doctrine, Jesus was enthroned as King in AD1914 when the “gentile times” ended. 1. Only one verse in scripture mentions “the times of the gentiles”: 'They will fall by the sword and will be taken as prisoners to all the nations. Jerusalem will be trampled on by the Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled.'  Luke 21:24 NIV. The Jehovah's Witness organisation has linked this one verse with other prophetic passages to calculate the supposed length of these “gentile times”, notably a time period which began hundreds of years before the incarnation and ended over 1900 years after it. 2. Simple examination of the text of Luke 21 reveals what Jesus was referring to when he used the phrase “the times of the gentiles”. Let's look at the passage together and distil this into four points which you may...

How Will Jehovah Forgive Us

  The June 2022 Watchtower Article 24 titled “ Jehovah—The Greatest Forgiver ” attempts to paint a picture of Jehovah as a wise, just, and knowledgeable judge – which, of course He is.  However, it also shows Him as a judge who has a number of requirements before He will forgive.  The article quotes numerous Old Testament scriptures showing that Jehovah will forgive our transgressions and agrees that this forgiveness is made possible through Jesus dying for our sins, though it doesn’t mention the covenant this sacrifice generated. As Christians we would understand that Jesus’ sacrifice, the shedding of His blood, pays for our sins so that a just God can be merciful and forgive them; the price for those sins has already been paid (1 Cor 6 v 20, Heb 9 v 22). In contrast, the Watchtower article talks of there being other requirements for Jehovah’s forgiveness.  It states that, before Jehovah will decide to offer forgiveness, “ He needs to be able to consider...