Skip to main content

Paul and the Woman at the Well

 

la conversion den san Pablo - Murillo

When Jesus said ‘go into all the world and preach the good news’ (Mark.16:15) lets be honest, perhaps he didn’t know some of the people we would encounter. Let’s face it, there are some we are simply reluctant to speak to for fear, sometimes, of mortal peril. Then there are those we would rather not be associated with because of their reputation.

Given a choice, which of us would eagerly witness to the woman of Samaria (John 4), or to Saul the persecutor (Acts 9)? Jesus witnessed to both in a surprising way and with amazing results. When we consider these two conversations we see lessons for us in the way God works.

The first lesson is that God is no respecter of persons and doesn’t judge things as we do. Who would have gone to that much trouble to speak to a Samaritan woman, someone who denies the authority of Jerusalem, believes only the Pentateuch, and rejects the temple of the Jews down south?

Effectively, she is a member of a Jewish cult (John 5:22) Remember that the next time a JW knocks your door, or a Mormon stops you in the street.

We have all seen how society treats the “outcast” and perhaps too often we have reacted in the same way. Who would dare approach a man who would hold other’s coats while they stoned someone for being Christian? (Acts 8:1)

Jesus would and he did. Saul of Tarsus, ‘still breathing threats and murder against the disciples of the Lord, went to the high priest and asked for letters to the synagogues in Damascus so that if he found any belonging to the Way, men or women, he might bring them bound to Jerusalem.’ (Acts 9:1/2)

To the amazement, puzzlement, astonishment of Christians, Pharisees, and not least Saul, that journey whose purpose was the destruction of the church was to be a turning point in his life, as well as in the life of the church. Jesus would deal with such a man and, therefore, so should we.

The second lesson is that people come to faith in different ways. Conversion, of course, is always supernatural, a work of the Spirit. However, some come to it by words and reason, some by visions. Some come suddenly, some gradually, some reluctantly, some eagerly.

Our witness must meet the needs of the individual and there is no formula for “getting them in”. God, however, is in it all and we must trust to him the work of changing hearts. Our work is being witnesses (Acts 1:8)

The third lesson is that we should expect the unexpected. Who would have expected this woman to intelligently discuss issues of faith as she did?

  • She knew the history of her people (John 4.12).

  • She understood about the conflicting claims of Jews and Samaritans (v.20).

  • She knew about, and seemed to live in expectancy of, the coming Messiah (v.25).

  • Finally, although she perhaps didn’t understand it all, she recognised the importance of this encounter for everyone (vv. 28-29).

    How surprising!

Now, in our prejudging way, we might have expected to have this conversation with Saul perhaps, and surely the vision should have come to the Samaritan woman. But it was Saul of Tarsus who had to be knocked off his self-righteous pedestal by a vision, and the woman of Samaria who was ready to listen to a reasoned defence (although, of course, this conversation was just as miraculous in its way, v.18).

But how unexpected! Let’s not prejudge as we witness because we don’t know who might, like the woman at the well, be better prepared than we think to talk about the things of God. And who knows what God might be preparing to do with the men like Saul in our lives. Perhaps sometimes our prayer should be ‘open their eyes Lord,’ and other times, ‘knock him off his horse Lord!’

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

The Mormon God’s Dysfunctional Family

You know those moments when you look at something you’ve looked at a thousand times before and suddenly see something new? I was looking at a blog I found via the Google Blog Alerts service and it told the familiar story of the Mormon “ Plan of Salvation”; you can read it here. There really was nothing surprising until I started thinking about what people might think if a family they knew conducted themselves the way the Mormon “family of God” do in this story. People from abusive backgrounds have problems enough with the idea of God as a Father but this story would put anyone off the idea forever! As I recount this story think about what the typical dad would do as his kids are growing up and compare it with this “exalted man.” According to Mormonism “ God created our spirits” and we lived with him in a pre-mortal existence (Mormons say “pre-existence” but it is not possible to pre-exist, i.e. to exist before you exist. The noun “existence” has to be have the prefix “pre” othe...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...