Skip to main content

A Picture of Jesus

 


I have never been a fan of pictures of Jesus. Several years ago, my, not yet Christian, sister bought me a picture of Jesus. She obviously thought it would be something I would enjoy and very much appreciate. Bless her, they say it’s the thought that counts.

Though I received it gracefully, it was something I would never have bought in a million years. It was one of those pictures of an effeminate looking Jesus hugging a smiling lamb. You know the sort I mean; you may even have one hanging on your wall at home (apologies if you do) – but it was not ‘my cup of tea’ and the picture never saw the light of day. In fact, I have no idea what happened to it.

Now don’t get me wrong, it is not that I believe the bible explicitly prohibits pictures of Jesus, though it does warn against the making and worshipping of graven images.[1] Indeed a picture of Jesus may prompt us to remember He is with us or maybe encourage us to be thankful and to pray. As I do not believe there is anything in the New Testament to prohibit us having a picture, and it could even be helpful, what is my concern?

What did Jesus look like?

Do we know what Jesus looked like? The common image of Jesus, at least in the west, is that of a man with flowing locks of lighter coloured hair, often blue-eyed with a neatly trimmed beard (see the Mormon picture above). But does this image accurately portray a first century Jewish man living in Palestine or is it more like a Hollywood Jesus?

The Bible offers few facts about his appearance, and perhaps deliberately so, but it does tell us that ‘he had no form or majesty that we should look at him, and no beauty that we should desire him.’ (Isaiah 53:2).

Rather than having us be overly concerned about what Jesus looked like, it seems Scripture is more concerned that we understand who Jesus is and what He did for us.

The Mormons love pictures of Jesus


I have a plethora of Mormon Missionaries as friends on social media. They are easily identifiable. Firstly, they will be wearing their LDS badges. Secondly, we can often spot them because somewhere on their timeline, they will have themselves pointing to a ‘cheesy’ picture of Jesus.

Now it is not that I begrudge them having a picture of Jesus, though their pictures are the most cringeworthy I’ve seen since my sister, well you know; rather it has more to do with my total conviction that though they think they know the man in their picture, they haven’t a clue who he is. Not only do they not know what He looked like, they do not know who He is or what He did for them.

The Mormon Picture of Jesus

‘The official doctrine of the Church is that Jesus is the literal offspring of God. He’s got 46 chromosomes; 23 came from Mary, 23 came from God the eternal Father.’[2] 

“That Child to be born of Mary was begotten of Elohim, the Eternal Father, not in violation of natural law but in accordance with a higher manifestation thereof; and the offspring from that association of supreme sanctity, celestial Sireship, and pure though mortal maternity, was of right to be called the ‘Son of the Highest.’”[3]

Mormons believe that the Jesus in their pictures is the product of a sexual relationship between the human Mary and the God they call Heavenly Father.

‘He is the Son of God, literally, actually, as men are the sons of mortal parents’[4]

But this was not the beginning of the Jesus in their picture, no their Jesus pre-existed as the literal firstborn son of Heavenly Father and Heavenly Mother. In the pre-existence he was known as Jehovah, and he was one of the three gods in the Mormon Godhead.  

Hold on there’s more…

The Mormon Jesus is also the brother of Lucifer.

‘The appointment of Jesus to be the Saviour of the world was contested by one of the other sons of God. He was called Lucifer, son of the morning. Haughty, ambitious, and covetous of power and glory, this spirit-brother of Jesus desperately tried to become the Saviour of mankind’[5]

And there’s more…

The Mormons do not believe that Jesus is eternally God, as the Bible states and orthodox Christians believe no, their picture of Jesus has him becoming a God through his own effort and obedience. For example, as the Mormons believe that baptism is a necessary requirement for progression towards becoming a God, Jesus had to be baptised by John. Also, as marriage is extremely important for a Mormon to progress towards exaltation, they would have to contend that Jesus was married.

A Different Picture of Jesus

From this we see that the Mormons have ‘a picture’ of Jesus, but not one that allows them the right to be call themselves Christians.

Their picture of Jesus puts them outside of historic, biblical Christianity.



[1] “You shall not make for yourself a carved image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. You shall not bow down to them or serve them, for I the Lord your God am a jealous God…” Exodus 20:4-5

[2] Stephen E. Robinson, interview in The Mormon Puzzle, DVD, North American Mission Board, Southern Baptist Convention, 1997.

[3] James E. Talmage, as quoted in Doctrines of the Gospel, p. 9

[4] What the Mormons Think of Christ (LDS pamphlet p.44)

[5] The Gospel Through the Ages – Milton R. Hunter p.15


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

The Times of the Gentiles - by Dawn Partington

Jehovah's Witnesses teach that “the times of the gentiles” is a time period of 2,520 years, beginning in 607BC and ending in AD1914. According to their doctrine, Jesus was enthroned as King in AD1914 when the “gentile times” ended. 1. Only one verse in scripture mentions “the times of the gentiles”: 'They will fall by the sword and will be taken as prisoners to all the nations. Jerusalem will be trampled on by the Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled.'  Luke 21:24 NIV. The Jehovah's Witness organisation has linked this one verse with other prophetic passages to calculate the supposed length of these “gentile times”, notably a time period which began hundreds of years before the incarnation and ended over 1900 years after it. 2. Simple examination of the text of Luke 21 reveals what Jesus was referring to when he used the phrase “the times of the gentiles”. Let's look at the passage together and distil this into four points which you may...

Resurrection or Cloning?

  In the film “The Sixth Day”, based in the near future where cloning of pets is allowed but not of humans, the main character, Adam, played by Arnold Schwarzenegger, wakes up in a taxi, not knowing how he got there.   He travels home only to see another man inside with his family; this man looks exactly like him.   Before being able to confront the imposter, Adam is attacked by unknown assailants and has to run.   This being an Arnie movie there are lots of shoot outs and the body count is high as Adam attempts to find out what is going on. It turns out that he has been cloned and the cloning company is trying to clear up the loose ends.   Spoiler alert; it turns out he is the clone and the other Adam is the original.   The story highlights some problems with the Watchtower’s ideas about ‘resurrection’.   They teach that, at death, who we are ceases to exist; there is no soul or spirit that survives death, nothing of our essence continues on. ...