Skip to main content

Are you Tired of Being an 'Ex'? There's a Plan.

 


People are looking for answers. One of the key attractions of a cult is certainty, the claim they have all the answers, a plan that is God’s plan. When someone leaves a cult this is one of the hardest things to deal with, letting go of the plan. There is an apparent uncertainty as the plan is taken away and replaced with simple trust in Jesus in a Western Church that often seems to fail in offering focus and direction.

Something I have warned about over the years is the danger of being an ‘ex,’ allowing your past to define you.

Let’s be frank here, the fault lies with the church that fails to have that focus, making some fall back on an identity defined by their past. Focus and direction are there in the Bible but churches can get so caught up in putting on programmes, events that attract unbelievers, serving the wider community, it can forget it’s primary purpose – making disciples. Are your surprised this is the church’s primary purpose? Perhaps you have been told the primary mission of the church is evangelism. Look at Jesus’ words:

All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptising them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And behold, I am with you always, to the end of the age.’ (Mt.28:18-20)

Of course, we are called to evangelise, reach the lost. Reachout Trust has the aim of equipping the church to do just that in the arena of cults and false teachers. When the lost are ‘found,’ however, it is not God’s intention that they should sit around being an audience.


There is a Plan

Something I have warned about over the years is the danger of being an ‘ex,’ allowing your past to define you. If you have come to Christ, put your faith in him, you are not an ‘ex-Mormon,’ an ‘ex-Jehovah’s Witness.’ You are not an ex-anything, you are a Christian, a follower of the Way, a disciple of Christ. Realising this will impact everything, from the way you witness to what you see when you read your Bible.

A Christian with a cult background is uniquely placed to understand the dilemma of cult members with questions, this much is obvious. But a person from a cult background who truly realises who they are in Christ is uniquely placed to tell the great good news of Jesus to a cult member, to explain to other Christians ‘what it’s like,’ to share the plan and purpose of God.

When you read the Bible you should see more than proof-texts.

Their emphasis is not on how wrong the cult is, but on how right the gospel is. When they read the Bible they see more than proof-texts, apologetics, they see God’s purposes in the church and in the world. They want to talk abut Jesus not Joseph Smith, talk about the righteousness found only in Christ, not talk about Charles Russell.

However, if they don’t know what the plan is the range of subjects for discussion is often limited to ‘you have the wrong Jesus.’ Confrontation can become the norm, frustration the common experience as cult members push back against our witnessing.

But there’s a plan…In his letter to Rome Paul writes of:

The unrighteousness of the Gentiles (1:18-32)

The unrighteousness of the Jews (2:1-3:8)

The unrighteousness of everyone (3:9-20)

Paul goes on to tell of the work of redemption, of:

the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all who believe’ (3:21-26)

This righteousness is available to Jews and Gentiles by faith (3:27-31)

And Abraham is the father of Jews and Gentiles by this same faith (4:1-25)

He assures us that we can have hope:

In Christ’s triumph over Adam’s sin (5:12-21)

In the triumph of grace over the power of sin (6:1-23)

in the triumph of grace over the power of the law (7:1-6)

We know this because of the revelation of God’s purposes:

In his saving promises to Israel (9:1-29)

In the righteousness in his plan for Jews and Gentiles (11:11-32)

This new community of the saved, both Jews and Gentiles, are to be taught (discipled) in:

Total dedication to God (12:1/2)

Expressing the distinctive marks of the Christian community (12:3-13:14)

...a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God, which is [our] spiritual duty. [No longer] conformed to the world, but transformed by the renewal of [our] minds...discerning what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect. (mature, or finished)(12:1/2)

Living together in peace and mutual respect (14:1-15:13) ...full of goodness, filled with all knowledge and able to instruct one another’ (15:14)

We are learning to be a community distinct from the world, schooled in kingdom living, teaching and encouraging one another in God’s perfect ways, with the aim of coming to full maturity in Christ. We are not ‘ex’ anything, we are Christians faithfully walking in God’s purposes for his glory.

If you still think of yourself as an ‘ex,’ if you think of me as an ‘ex,’ adjust your thinking because this is what the Bible tells us to do if we are to walk in God’s ways, be a light to the world, and reach out to the cults. There is so much more in our new identity in Christ and we need to know it and share it.

Comments

Yet another ill-devised slur against members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Since Chairman Mike was a Latter-day Saint for 14 years, we should expect his take on the Restored Gospel to be more grounded in truth.

As your university tutors will tell you, essays should include both pros and cons, and those that rely on only one side are forcing their opinions on their readers.

So sad to see a man of Mike's capabilities reduced to lightweight and sinister efforts to speak against his former sacred faith.

I am a Latter-day Saint of 72 years membership and I find it virtually impossible to recognise my faith, beliefs, and practices in Mike's diatribes. I will add that I have been familiar with Reach Out Trust for many years and have always been disappointed by the commonalities and deceptions that mark its productions.

Easter is coming. Latter-day Saints acknowledge Christ's sacrifice on the cross of Golgotha, and weep for the pain we have caused the Innocent One. It is not true, and Mike knows it is not, that Latter-day Saints do not honour the instrument of Jesus' death and Atonement.

Whilst it is true that few Latter-day Saints wear crosses and our buildings are not adorned with crosses or crucifixes, we know within our beings what the Cross meant and what his Atoning Sacrifice on it wrought, and we are grateful.

Saying otherwise changes nothing.

I wish everyone, ROT, included, a Joyful Easter that is both a cause for sorrow and exultations because Christ not only died on the cross for our sakes, but he rose from the dead just as we all shall.

Thank you Father in Heaven for the gift of Thine only-begotten Son Jesus Christ and his Atoning Sacrifice.

All Latter-day Saint Christians will share in this time of sorrow and rejoicing, knowing that God the Father and his Son Jesus Christ keep their promises.

Ronnie
Michael Thomas said…
HI Ronnie,

I must point out this article is not about Mormonism. As to being one-sided, this ministry is decidedly one-sided, unlike Mormonism which changes it clothes to fit the day of the week. A case in point is one Mormon president promoting the 'I'm a Mormon' campaign only for his immediate successor to shoot it down in flames. Two initiatives, each costing millions of the ordinary members' tithing, each contradicting the other.

'I'm a Mormon.' Thomas S Monson

'I'm not.' Russell M Nelson

The world finds Jesus particularly one-sided as it moves at speed further from his singular and uncompromising truth. Why can't the man just play nicely? But he insists, '"Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword." Mt.10:24

His message is clear; pick a side or it will be picked for you by your very indecision. Mormonism used to hold this line; what happened?

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...