Skip to main content

From Church to Cult – Why Cults attract Church-Goers

 


They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would have continued with us. But they went out, that it might become plain that they all are not of us.  – 1 John 2:19

It may not be much of a shock for me to tell you that, every day people are recruited into new religious movements. You may find it a little more shocking, when I tell you that a some of these converts were once sat in our pews. How can that be?

This is the first of two articles where I will consider three reasons why a person may leave the church and join a cult.

    1) The Church

Our first question should be: Was this person ever a member of the church they attended? To answer this question, we need to consider two further questions. Firstly, what is the church? and secondly, how does a person become a member of the church?

You may have heard it said that the church is not the building it’s the people, this is true. The word translated ‘church’ in the Bible is the Greek word ‘ekklesia’ (κκλησία). It can also be rightly translated as ‘assembly’ or ‘congregation’. Ekklesia is made from two words ‘ek’ meaning ‘out’ and ‘kaleo’ meaning ‘to call’. The church then is a group of people who have been called out, but called out from what and to what?

The church is made up of people who have been called out from the world and who now belong to God. Called out of the darkness they are now in the light. But how does this happen? How does a person become part of the church?

Church – The Building

Our church buildings may be full of people on a Sunday, but how many of these people have been called out and belong to God? How many of these people have repented, received Christ as their Lord and Saviour and been forgiven of their sin? Those who have, now find themselves to be members of the ekklesia – the church. In all probability the group of people gathered in our church buildings on a Sunday morning will most likely be made up of what Jesus called the wheat and the tares. It is not our place to judge which are which, but we know that those who do belong to Him will bear the fruit of repentance.

Because we know that not everyone who attends church gatherings are truly part of the ekklesia, we must keep the gospel message front and centre.

What is the Gospel?

In a nutshell, the gospel is the good news about Jesus. The gospel message tells us that we are separated from God because of our sin. God became man in Jesus. His reason for doing so was to take the punishment that our sin deserves, and, through His resurrection, He defeated death. God offers salvation and forgiveness to anyone who repents and believes in His Son.

“For God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.  John 3:16

It is my conviction that those who leave a church and join a cult have never received Christ as Lord and Saviour and so they were never truly part of the church.

2) The Teaching

On more than one occasion I have had a cult member tell me that they used to be part of a church. They perhaps grew up attending Sunday School or even held a position within the church. They say something along the lines of: ‘Well I never really understood (fill in the blank) when I was in church – but I do now’. Usually, with Jehovah’s Witnesses you hear: ‘Well, I never understood that trinity stuff - it was so confusing. But now I realise the word ‘trinity’ is not in the Bible because it is an unbiblical pagan doctrine. Now I know the truth, I am no longer confused.’

How sad it is to hear these kinds of comments, but they are very telling.

Deeds not Creeds

We are living at a time when what a person does is valued far more highly than what a person believes. I will consider this further in my next article, but it is enough to say here that this is a false dichotomy. Surely, what we do flows from what we believe. 

The problem for the church is that in following suit it pushes doctrine, as if unimportant, to the side. The resulting effect is that members of the church are not taught the biblical, historical, orthodox teaching of the Christian Church.

Catechism

Catechesis is a practice forgotten by many in the modern church. In the not-too-distant past believers would catechise their children and new converts. This means that each person would be taught the beliefs and practices of the Church – usually by a series of questions and answers.

Sinclair Ferguson, in his book ‘Faithful God’ reminds us that:

Christians in an earlier generation rarely thought of writing books on guidance. There is a reason for that (just as there is a reason why so many of us today are drawn to books that will tell us how to find God’s will). Our forefathers in the faith were catechised, and they taught catechisms to their children. Often as much as half of the catechism would be devoted to an exposition of the answers to questions like the following:
Question: Where do we find God’s will?
Answer: In the Scriptures.
Question: Where in particular in the Scriptures?
Answer: In the Commandments that God has given to us.

Why were these questions and answers so important? Because these Christians understood that God’s law provides basic guidelines that cover the whole of life. Indeed, in the vast majority of instances, the answer to the question ‘What does God want me to do?’ will be found by answering the question: ‘How does the law of God apply to this situation? What does the Lord require of me here in his word?’[1]

Throughout its history the Church has seen the need to formulate creeds (statements of belief) to not only equip the saints with doctrinal truth, but also to arm the brethren against falsehood.

If a so called ‘church-goer’ leaves to join a cult, it has to be that they have either not been taught, or not understood the great truths upon which the church stands. It is vitally important that we do not just affirm these truths, but we are able to defend them, and say why they are true. 

It is my conviction that those who leave a church and join a cult have never truly known, nor understood, true biblical doctrine. 

Next time we will consider a further reason why a person may leave the church to join a cult. 



[1] Sinclair Ferguson – Faithful God (quoted in The Benefits of the Catechisms | Tim Challies)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...