Skip to main content

THE UNITY JESUS


Unity is for people who might call themselves spiritual but not religious. It is for those who sense the depths of their own being and celebrate the awareness of a power greater than themselves. The teachings in Unity bring together ancient wisdom with new interpretations of what it means to be alive and human. Unity inspires different ways to think about the force of love and intelligence that many people call God.[1]

 

Founded in 1889 by Charles and Myrtle Fillmore, Unity School of Christianity (now more commonly known as Unity) finds its roots in New Thought.[2]

It is claimed that Unity began through Myrtle Fillmore developing tuberculosis. In her desire to be healed she attended a lecture about metaphysical healing. Sometime after this, as she had applied what she had been taught, she professed to have been healed

Somewhat sceptical, her husband Charles began to consider metaphysics for himself along with the study of many religions and philosophies. It was during this time that Charles claims to have heard a voice saying ‘Unity’. This led to the founding of The Unity School of Christianity.

Though similar in many ways to other nineteenth century New Thought offshoots like Christian Science, Unity goes further. It does not just reinterpret the Bible, and the words and person of Jesus in an allegorical and metaphysical way, Unity gathers together a smorgasbord of ideas to develop and teach something completely foreign to historic Christianity.

Charles Fillmore unashamedly admitted that he had ‘borrowed the best from all religions.’ What he developed is a hodgepodge of New Thought, Christian Science, Hinduism, Theosophy, Rosicrucianism and Spiritualism with some Christian terminology thrown in, so the name Unity aptly describes Fillmore’s new theology.

As we have seen in previous articles, there are many groups that use the word Christian/Christianity in their names, but even a cursory look at their teachings proves they are far from the faith that was ‘once and for all delivered unto the saints.’[3] This is true of Unity.

It is now time to turn our attention to the question Jesus asked his disciples: ‘Who do you say that I am?’ what does Unity teach regarding the Saviour?

 JESUS IS GOOD BUT HE’S NOT GOD

We believe that Jesus expressed his divine potential and sought to show humankind how to express ours as well. We see Jesus as a master teacher of universal truths and as our Way Shower. In Unity, we use the term Christ to mean the divinity in humankind. Jesus is the great example of the Christ in expression.[4] 

As we can see from this quote, Unity believes Jesus to be a ‘master teacher of universal truths’, and an example to those who would follow him. The name Jesus Christ is interpreted to mean Jesus the divine. 

Unity denies the deity of Jesus, whilst affirming his divinity. By divinity they mean that Jesus was divine, but it teaches that every human is divine.

‘Unity teaches that the spirit of God dwelt in Jesus, just as it indwells every person; and that every person has the potential to express the perfection of Christ, as Jesus did, by being more Christ-like in everyday life.’[5]

Jesus, like each of us, was inherently good, and lived a perfect life because the Spirit of God lived in him. Understanding this, Jesus lived and appropriated the metaphysical knowledge he had. That is why he could heal others.

Unity separates Jesus from the Christ, claiming that each of us possesses the ‘Christ’ consciousness. In Jesus, we find our perfect example, he is a model of perfect man working in harmony with divine mind. Therefore, who he was we can be, and what he did we can do.

Just as Jesus lived his divine potential showing others how to express their divinity, which Unity calls Christ; so, we can imitate him and realise our own divine potential.

PEOPLE ARE GOOD

Unity teaches that people are also divine and inherently good. This is a far cry from the Biblical doctrine of original sin. It should be noted here that Unity never refers to Jesus as Saviour or Messiah. Believing people to be divine and good, Unity has a flawed view of the purpose of the incarnation of Jesus. Did he come only to be our example, a way shower?

Though Unity claims the Bible as its textbook, it teaches that it is no more than a history book and a moral guide. ‘The Bible’, they say, reveals the spirit of Truth and the word of God. Holy Spirit, working individually through those who study Scripture and listen within, is the final authority in spiritual awakening.’[6]

Unity tends to allegorise Scripture, as can be seen clearly in its understanding of the person and work of Jesus. Unity does not mention his atonement or sacrificial death on the cross for humanity's sin in its statement of beliefs, rather it claims:

The blood of Jesus Christ represents the spiritual energy of God-life that purifies or redeems the body through a cleansing and renewal of the consciousness by the spoken word. Regarding the "spilled blood," or the "ransom of many," the emphasis in Unity is not so much on the death of Jesus as on His life. He did not relieve us of the necessity of working out our own salvation, but His example and teachings show us the way.[7]

Sin is our separation from God in consciousness, caused by our belief in the "devil" or a power other than God, the good. This belief leads to our unwise use of our God-given powers and abilities. Salvation is now--not something that occurs after death. It happens whenever we turn our thoughts (repent) from fear, anxiety, worry, and doubt, to thoughts of love, harmony, joy, and peace. The "fall" takes place in consciousness whenever we fall into negative habits of thinking.[8]

WHAT DOES THE BIBLE SAY?

The Bible describes Jesus as the sinless, Son of God. He is fully God and fully man (John 5:18, Philippians 2:6-7). Nowhere does it teach that Jesus was just a man who expressed his divine potential. Neither is He just an example to follow, rather He is a Saviour to be accepted and trusted in. 

We need a Saviour because we are not inherently good. The Bible says:

"For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God"

(Romans 3:23).

“None is righteous, no, not one; no one understands; no one seeks for God.”  (Roman 3:10-11)

Sin is therefore not just wrong thinking, and neither is Salvation just right thinking. We cannot be saved through our own efforts:

For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast.’ (Ephesians 2:8-9)

‘…  he saved us, not because of works done by us in righteousness, but according to his own mercy… ‘  (Titus 3:5)

If, as Unity teaches, Jesus came only to show us that we are divine and to be an example of how we are to live as he did, why did Jesus say that his reason for coming was to go to the cross?

“Now is my soul troubled. And what shall I say? ‘Father, save me from this hour’? But for this purpose I have come to this hour. (John 12:27)

Unity teaches that people can have their own truth and follow their own paths, but Jesus said:

"I am the way, the truth, and the life: no one comes to the Father, except through me." (John 14:6)

The Jesus of Unity is not the Jesus of the Bible and therefore He cannot save. They need the Jesus who was fully God and fully man, the eternal Son of God, the one who died for their sin and three days late rose physically from the dead. Without this Jesus, they remain dead in their trespasses and sin.

Acts 4:12 says, "And there is salvation in no one else; for there is no other name under heaven that has been given among men by which we must be saved."



[1] www.unity.org /about-us/what-unity

[2] New Thought is a system of doctrine and practice originating in the 19th century and stressing the power of thought to control physical and mental events.

[3] Jude 3

[4] www.ntunity.org/new-unity

[5] https://www.unityofcalgary.org/20-questions-about-unity

[6] ibid

[7] ibid

[8] ibid


 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...