So, if a Murderer...The Cults and Grace

Someone asked if a murder repents and turns to Jesus in the last days of their life is that person saved? It is a familiar enough question, popular with the cults. People usually find the answer scandalous; nobody is beyond the reach of his grace except the one who will not receive it. What does that mean?

It means, 'Whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life. He does not come into judgement, but has passed from death to life.' (John 5:24, ESV, [words of Jesus])

'Whoever' means anyone may come, no one is turned away who comes in repentance, no truly repentant sinner is beyond the reach of his grace. Peter writes, ‘For Christ also suffered once for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh but made alive in the spirit...’ (1 Pet.3:18) The scandal is the cross, the righteous dying for the unrighteous, but there it is.

'Has eternal life' means those who come, hear, and believe know eternal life as a present possession. You have it. You don’t simply hope for it, much less work for it, you have it. Paul writes to saints in Rome, ‘For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.’ (Rom.6:23) More scandal, the repentant sinner gets what he/she certainly doesn’t deserve, but that is the nature of a gift.

'Will not come into judgement' means they are washed clean in the blood of the Lamb and considered righteous in the same way Abraham was considered righteous because he believed God. (Gen.15:6) Jesus told Nicodemus, ‘Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God.’ (John 3:18)

'Has crossed from death to life' means whoever comes and believes passes from the death of sin to the life in Christ. They are equipped to walk in his ways, not perfectly, but increasingly in his love, in a process of becoming like him, with the assurance 'he who began a good work in you will bring it to completion at the day of Jesus Christ.' (Philippians 1:6) John writes elsewhere, ‘We know that we have passed out of death into life, because we love the brothers. Whoever does not love abides in death.’ (1 John 3:14) Note, love is the evidence of life, not life the fruit of love. I sometimes challenge Mormons after such a discussion, ’As we speak I stand in life, where do you stand?’

Using what are extreme examples in hypothetical situations demonstrates three things:

As you eye up the offences of another you put yourself in the place of God to judge, the original sin; See Luke 18:9-14.
You limit the reach of God's grace when you should rejoice with heaven when anyone turns in faith to Christ.
You unconsciously make comparisons between you and the other person, underestimating your own desperate need for grace. Here is James’ verdict:

‘If you really fulfil the royal law according to the Scripture, “You shall love your neighbour as yourself,” you are doing well. But if you show partiality, you are committing sin and are convicted by the law as transgressors. For whoever keeps the whole law but fails in one point has become guilty of all of it. For he who said, “Do not commit adultery,” also said, “Do not murder.” If you do not commit adultery but do murder, you have become a transgressor of the law. So speak and so act as those who are to be judged under the law of liberty. For judgment is without mercy to one who has shown no mercy. Mercy triumphs over judgment.’ (James 2:8-13)

Consider James’ words and tell me you have not broken the whole law, that your heart is not black with sin and you in desperate need of saving. The judgement in that question about the murderer shows a shocking lack of the very mercy for which James calls, and an ignorance of your own need of mercy and forgiveness.

Understand James's point, you are a law breaker just as anyone else is a law breaker who is in Adam, so your need is the same as mine, as the imagined murderer.

We all need a Saviour and we had better hope no one is beyond the grace of God otherwise we might all be in trouble. The invitation is to 'whoever' so is the murderer a 'whoever'? Are you?

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...

Bridge of Reason

Search This Blog