Skip to main content

The Scientology Jesus

 


Like many non-Christian religions, Scientology will acknowledge Jesus as an important player in the history of faith.  But to fully comprehend the Jesus of Scientology, we need to briefly consider the broader teachings of this group.

Scientology Belief

The founder of Scientology L. Ron Hubbard, a Science Fiction writer, is widely reported to have said the following: 

“You don't get rich writing science fiction. If you want to get rich, you start a religion.”[1]

An so he did. We might imagine that a belief system founded by the author of science fiction, would have a myth-like, imaginary feel to it, and so it does!

Reading like one of his science-fiction books, Hubbard taught that people are immortal alien beings (called thetans) who have forgotten their true nature and are trapped on earth in a human body.

He went on to teach that each thetan has lived numerous past lives, both on earth and on other planets. During these past lives thetans have been infected by engrams (a mental image of a past experience that produces a negative emotional effect in an individual’s life) and also by implants (similar to engrams but these are planted deliberately and with evil intent).

As spirits (thetans) who have lived many times, we do not realise that during our past lives we have had implanted numerous false realities (implants) and become infected by negative emotions (engrams). This is where Scientology can help.

Scientology to the rescue.

According to their website:

The word Scientology, conceived by L. Ron Hubbard, comes from the Latin scio which means “knowing, in the fullest meaning of the word” and the Greek word logos which means “study of.” It means knowing how to know. Scientology is further defined as “the study and handling of the spirit in relationship to itself, universes and other life.”[2]

Scientology claims that it can help you know the truth of who you really are; and who you really are is a good person in need of some help. So, beginning with a free personality test, which helps you discover what is stopping you from reaching your full potential, Scientology then offers a package (called auditing) that will clear you of those pesky implants and engrams. Once signed up, you begin a rather lengthy and costly journey.

At commencement you are classified as a pre-clear with the aim, through Scientology, to become ‘clear’. This happens when you are free of implants and engrams, and are ‘clear’ to become what they call an Operating Thetan (O.T.). It is then that you are free to discover the real you.

With all this in mind let us consider how Scientology views the person and work of Jesus.

Jesus the Implant

It appears that L. Ron Hubbard said some conflicting things regarding the person of Jesus.

Somebody somewhere on this planet, back about 600 BC, found some pieces of R6, and I don't know how they found it, either by watching madmen or something, but since that time they have used it and it became what is known as Christianity. The man on the Cross. There was no Christ.[3]

Hubbard stated that Christ never really existed, but rather he was an implant (he called this R6). He wrote:

‘You will find… the Christ legend as an implant in pre-clears a million years ago.’[4]

According to Hubbard, those trusting in Christ are trusting in a false reality.

Later he claimed the historic Jesus did exist, but Hubbard was clearly not a fan, as these irreverent words clearly show:

For those of you whose Christian toes I may have stepped on, let me take the opportunity to disabuse you of some lovely myths. For instance, the historic Jesus was not nearly the sainted figure [he] has been made out to be. In addition to being a lover of young boys and men, he was given to uncontrollable bursts of temper and hatred.... You have only to look at the history his teachings inspired to see where it all inevitably leads. It is historic fact and yet man still clings to the ideal, so deep and insidious is the biologic implanting.[5]

Elsewhere Hubbard claimed that Jesus was below the level of Operating Thetan, being just a ‘shade above’ clear[6]

How does Hubbard’s Jesus compare to the Biblical Jesus?

The Bible vs Scientology

Scientology teaches that man is basically good and so is just in need of some repair. It claims to help people discover the truth about themselves, so that they can become all that they are meant to be.

The Bible teaches that man is fallen and sinful, beyond repair.

Psalm 51:5  Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, and in sin did my mother conceive me.

Romans 5:12 Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all sinned.

Romans 3:10-18  “None is righteous, no, not one; no one understands; no one seeks for God. All have turned aside; together they have become worthless; no one does good, not even one.” “Their throat is an open grave they use their tongues to deceive.” “The venom of asps is under their lips.” “Their mouth is full of curses and bitterness.” “Their feet are swift to shed blood; in their paths are ruin and misery, and the way of peace they have not known.”
“There is no fear of God before their eyes.”

The Bible teaches the truth that man cannot save himself. There are no number of courses he can take, no amount of money he can spend, to make himself ‘clear’.

Knowing that we are fallen and incapable of saving ourselves, the Bible points us to the solution, it points us to the person and work of the Lord Jesus Christ.

This is where the ‘implant’ and impotent Jesus of Scientology comes up way short. To Scientology Jesus is at best a footnote in the history of mankind, whereas the Bible portrays him as the Son of God and the Saviour of the world.

John 3:16  For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.

1 John 4:14  And we have seen and testify that the Father has sent his Son to be the Saviour of the world.

The purpose of the Father sending the Son is not to free people from engrams and implants, but rather to free mankind from the stain and power of sin. That which we cannot be done by self-improvement, by knowledge gained from increasingly expensive courses is achieved by the Lord Jesus:

1 Peter 2:24  He himself bore our sins in his body on the tree, that we might die to sin and live to righteousness. By his wounds you have been healed.

2 Corinthians 5:21  For our sake he made him to be sin who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God.

MISSION IMPOSSIBLE

Many attracted to Scientology’s stated aim of true spiritual enlightenment and freedom for all, will ultimately find it to be mission impossible.

If you long to be enlightened, you need to come to the one who said: “I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will not walk in darkness, but will have the light of life.”[7]

If your desire is to be set free, you need to come to the Son for if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed.’[8]

Scientology, like all religions who deny the person and work of Jesus, cannot meet the real need of humankind. Jesus said:

‘Come to me, all who labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.’[9]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



[1] Remark at a meeting of the Eastern Science Fiction Association, November 07, 1948.

[2] https://www.scientology.org/faq/background-and-basic-principles/what-does-the-word-scientology-mean.html

[3] L. Ron Hubbard "Class VIII Course, Lecture No. 10, Assists" October 3, 1968; taped lecture.

[4] L. Ron Hubbard, Professional Auditor’s Bulletin 31, quoted by Anderson, Report 150. (Quoted in The Kingdom of the Cults, Walter Martin p.364)

[5]   L. Ron Hubbard, Student Briefing, OT VIII, Series 1 (https://azhlynnes.blog/2020/12/21/an-open-letter-to-kirstie-alley/)

[6] Wright, Lawrence (2013-01-17). Going Clear: Scientology, Hollywood, and the Prison of Belief. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.

[7] John 8:12

[8] John 8:36

[9] Matthew 11:28

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...