Skip to main content

THE SWEDENBORGIAN JESUS

Image
By

 


Also known as The New Church or The Church of New Jerusalem, Swedenborgianism has been around since the late eighteenth century. This new religious movement developed around the writings of the scientist and Swedish Lutheran theologian Emanuel Swedenborg.

Swedenborg was an exceptional scientist writing over thirty scientific papers, but he decided to leave his profession to write and speak on spiritual matters. He became convinced that he was to bring about a revival of Christianity, so he spent the last twenty-five years of his life in this pursuit.

Like numerous founders of new religious movements, Swedenborg declared himself called of God to restore apostate Christianity. However, his account of being ‘chosen’ is a cause for concern:

I went to my room, but that night the same man revealed himself to me again. I was not frightened then. He said that He was the Lord God, the Creator and Redeemer of the world, and that He had chosen me to declare to men the spiritual contents of Scripture; and that He Himself would declare to me what I should write on this subject. Then, on the same night, the world of spirits, hell, and heaven were opened to me with full conviction. I recognised there many acquaintances of every condition in life. And from that day on I gave up all practice of worldly letters and devoted my labour to spiritual things. I have written entire pages and the spirits did not dictate the words, but absolutely guided my hand, so it was they who were doing the writing… as flowed from God Messiah…[1]

 

These ‘spirits’ led Swedenborg to completely redefine historic Christianity. He began to offer new interpretations of previously held biblical truths, as well as adding extra-biblical revelations – hence he gave rise to what became known as The New Church.

Our concern, in this article, is what Swedenborg taught about the person and work of the Lord Jesus Christ.  How does the New Church answer Jesus’ question to his disciples:   Who do you say that I am?

The New Church and Jesus.

The New Church teaches that there is one God and Jesus is God. If we stopped there, we may conclude that they are orthodox in this teaching but, upon closer inspection, we discover they are not.

The Lord Jesus Christ is the one God of heaven and earth — the all-powerful Creator and Provider, and the approachable, loving, personal God who reaches out to all of us. The Father is the Soul, the Son is the Body, and the Holy Spirit is the Activity of the One Divine Person.[2]

In denying the orthodox view of the Trinity, the New Church offers something quite different. Jesus, they claim, was the soul of the Father; this soul took on a body to become the Son and all he said and did, his activity, was the Holy Spirit. They define this as a trinity of aspects - soul, body, and influence. This is far from the historic doctrine of the Trinity.

James White[3] helpfully defines the biblical view of the trinity in this way:

1) There is one and only one God, eternal, immutable.

2) There are three eternal Persons described in Scripture – the Father, the Son, and the Spirit. These Persons are never identified with one another – that is, they are carefully differentiated as Persons.

3) The Father, the Son, and the Spirit are identified as being fully deity—that is, the Bible teaches the Deity of Christ and the Deity of the Holy Spirit. (John 1:1; John 20:28; Isaiah 9:6; Titus 2:13; Colossian 2:9; 1 Corinthians 2:11; Hebrews 9:14; Acts 5:3-4). 

The New Church teaches that Jesus is only one of numerous avatars.

They claim that God has appeared on earth in other religions, for example Rama and Krishna in Hinduism. Jesus is only simply the Christian incarnation. Therefore, God has, and does, reveal himself through other religions and so all religions can lead to salvation. But this is not what Jesus said or what the bible teaches:

Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.   John 14:6

“For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.  John 3:16 

And there is salvation in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.”  Acts 4:12

But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the end of the earth.”  Acts 1:8.

The New Church teaches that Jesus saved us, not through his death, but through his life. 

According to The New Church:

[Jesus] overcame evil and restored a sense of balance in the world, leaving us in freedom to choose good or evil. He taught us how we should live our lives; in fact he showed us how to do it. It is only by so doing that we can be truly happy. When we die, we continue to make these choices, which determines whether we live in heaven loving God and doing his will, or turn away from him to hell. Jesus set the stage so that we are free to choose. We must do our part to choose good, which will draw us closer to the Divine. This is how Jesus saves…

Swedenborg spiritualised Jesus’ death and therefore completely redefined its meaning.[4] He denied the need for a vicarious atonement saying:

Reason alone should convince anyone who is the least bit enlightened that sins can be taken away from us only by active repentance—that is, by our seeing our sins, begging the Lord for help, and desisting from them.[5]

Ultimately, according to this teaching, salvation is dependent on us. We can choose to accept to follow Jesus’ example, keep the commandments, and ask the Lord for help. This can perhaps be summed up by the phrase: Do your best and God will do the rest.

The Bible teaches something quite different. The Apostle Peter wrote: “He himself bore our sins in his body on the tree, that we might die to sin and live to righteousness. By his wounds you have been healed.” 1 Peter 2:24 and “For Christ also suffered once for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, that he might bring us to God.” 1 Peter 3:18

The Apostle Paul wrote:

For our sake he made him to be sin who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God.  2 Corinthians 5:21

Much more could be said about what The New Church teaches contrary to the Word of God, but hopefully this article is enough to show they have a ‘different’ Jesus and therefore a ‘different’ Gospel – one that cannot save. 

[1] Cyriel O. Sigstedt, The Swedenborg Epic: The Life and Works of Emmanuel Swedenborg (New York: Bookman 1952) pp. 198, 211

[2] https://newchurch.org/get-answers/spiritual-concepts/

[3] https://www.aomin.org/aoblog/theology-matters/a-brief-definition-of-the-trinity/

[4] https://swedenborg.com/recap-why-jesus-suffer-die/

[5] Emanuel Swedenborg – The Lord 17:3 (https://swedenborg.com/recap-why-jesus-suffer-die/)




Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

By
In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

By
The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...
70 comments
Read more

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

By
The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...
18 comments
Read more