Skip to main content

Why Transubstantiation?


Transubstantiation is the Catholic dogma that the substance of the Eucharistic elements turn into the body and blood of Christ at consecration, only the appearances of bread and wine still remaining. They base this mainly on Jesus’ teaching in John 6, where Jesus taught, ‘Whoever feeds on my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day.’ John 6:54

The 16th century Council of Trent declared anathema (a curse) on anyone who denied the dogma. Does the bread and wine turn into the body and blood of Christ? Did Jesus intend us to take his words literally, or is there another meaning here?

John 6 begins with the account of Jesus’ feeding of the five-thousand. We remember the story of the boy with the loaves and fishes, how Jesus multiplied them, gave thanks (eucharisteō ‘to thank’) and distributed this generous bounty. So generous, indeed, there were 12 baskets of food left over.

John tells us the people would take Jesus by force and make him king v.15. Comparing him to Moses, they had identified him as the prophet who was to come into the world v.14, but saw him as their earthly champion, just as Moses had been. This Jesus would be their king, tend to all their needs, as Moses had for Israel. Jesus’ purpose was very different, and he withdrew from them.

When they followed him to Capernaum he gave them short shrift. His miracles were never just miracles, they were signs, and these people had missed their significance. It is here Jesus begins his Bread of Life discourse.

Truly, truly, I say to you, you are seeking me, not because of the signs, but because you ate your fill of the loaves. Do not labour for food that perishes, but for the food that endures to eternal life, which the Son of Man will give to you. For on him God the Father has set his seal.’ V.27

Jesus hadn’t come just to fill men’s bellies, but to feed and satisfy their souls. That is why he urged them to ‘labour for the food that endures to eternal life.’ Then they asked a very sensible question, ‘What must we do, to be doing the works of God?’ v.28 Jesus answered them:

This is the work of God, that you believe in him whom he has sent.’ v.29

Believe’ is the Greek pisteuō 'to trust (in)' In other words, the work of God is to trust Jesus. There follows a discussion about Moses and the manna, the bread from heaven that fed their fathers in the wilderness to which Jesus replied:

Truly, truly, I say to you, it was not Moses who gave you the bread from heaven, but my Father gives you the true bread from heaven. For the bread of God is he who comes down from heaven and gives life to the world.’ v.v. 32,33

When they insist they would have this bread Jesus said to them

I am the bread of life; whoever comes to me shall never hunger, and whoever believes in me shall never thirst. v.36

What is the work of God? To trust in Jesus.

How are we to never hunger? By coming to Jesus.

How are to never thirst? By believing in Jesus.

Whoever comes to Jesus, believing and trusting in him, will never hunger, will always be satisfied. Faith in him fills and satisfies our hunger, trust in him quenches the driest thirst. Coming to him we find peace and rest for our souls. Does this sound familiar, it should because it is the gospel. But the Jews grumbled about him v.41 Jesus responds:

Truly truly, I say to you, whoever believes has eternal life.’ v.47

He keeps hammering home this simple truth because they simply didn’t get it:

I am the bread of life. Your fathers ate the manna in the wilderness, and they died. This is the bread that comes down from heaven. If anyone eats of this bread, he will live forever.

And the bread I will give for the life of the world is my flesh.’ vv 48-51

This bread from heaven is the body of Christ that was sacrificed at Calvary to pay for the sins of the world. This bread is the spiritual meat and drink of our souls when we come, trust, and believe in the finished work of the cross. They grumbled, ‘How can this man give us his flesh to eat?’ v 52 They were still in the carnal mind that drove them to try to make him another Moses. They were still thinking of their bellies, ignorant of their spiritual needs so Jesus gave the ultimatum:

Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you. Whoever feeds on my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day.’ vv 53,54

In verse 47 Jesus declares, ‘Truly truly, I say to you, whoever believes has eternal life.’

In verse 54 Jesus insists, ‘Whoever feeds on my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life’

Both statements are reconciled at Calvary, where Jesus’ body hung on a tree and his blood was shed for your sin and mine. It is trust in that finished work that gains for us eternal life. To eat his flesh and drink his blood is to trust in his sacrifice of both flesh and blood. He truly is the bread that came down from heaven and we are invited to feed and never go hungry.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent

The Mormon God’s Dysfunctional Family

You know those moments when you look at something you’ve looked at a thousand times before and suddenly see something new? I was looking at a blog I found via the Google Blog Alerts service and it told the familiar story of the Mormon “ Plan of Salvation”; you can read it here. There really was nothing surprising until I started thinking about what people might think if a family they knew conducted themselves the way the Mormon “family of God” do in this story. People from abusive backgrounds have problems enough with the idea of God as a Father but this story would put anyone off the idea forever! As I recount this story think about what the typical dad would do as his kids are growing up and compare it with this “exalted man.” According to Mormonism “ God created our spirits” and we lived with him in a pre-mortal existence (Mormons say “pre-existence” but it is not possible to pre-exist, i.e. to exist before you exist. The noun “existence” has to be have the prefix “pre” othe