Skip to main content

Not Peace, But a Sword (Matthew 10:34-37)

Image
By
I don’t want to spoil anyone’s Christmas and, certainly, I do wish everyone a very blessed and peaceful season but...well, it was never going to be easy bringing peace to the earth. I recently heard an excellent sermon reminding us that the babe in the manger was destined to die a brutal and ignominious death on the Cross; you can’t have Christmas without the Cross.

Of course, we often get so sentimental about Christmas – “it’s all about the children isn’t it”; or cynical about it all – “I don’t see much peace on earth.” But the Christ who made the sacrifice that might bring peace also challenges us to choose peace.

It has always been this way since the beginning. Adam and Eve could choose obedience or rebellion (Gen.2:16); Israel was challenged before entering the Promised Land to choose between the gods of Egypt or the Living God who saved them (Josh.24:15); when Paul preached in Athens he declared:

“The times of ignorance God overlooked, but now he commands all people everywhere to repent, because he has fixed a day on which he will judge the world in righteousness by a man whom he has appointed; and of this he has given assurance to all by raising him from the dead.” (Acts 17:30-31)

The angels famously announced the birth of Isaiah’s Prince of Peace (Is.9:6) and declared, “on earth peace, goodwill toward men” (Lk.2:14NKJV). People know the peace on earth part, but they forget how this angel song begins, 'Glory to God!'

In fact, it doesn't really say, peace, goodwill toward men. It says, 'Peace, goodwill among those with whom he is pleased.' (ESV, NASB) With whom is he pleased? On whom does his favour rest? (NIV)

When that Prince departed this life he invoked peace on his followers (Jn.14:27). He came to bring peace between man and God and among men, yet there is still the challenge to receive and embrace that peace.

Jesus came to restore what was lost

The consequence of our choices is conflict between Christ and anti-Christ, light and darkness, good and evil, the children of God and those who choose to follow the god of this world. Even between members of the same family:

“For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law. And a person's enemies will be those of his own household. Whoever loves father or mother more than me is not worthy of me, and whoever loves son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me.” (Mt.10:35-36)

It all seems a little harsh, all this strife and conflict going on in the name of the babe in the manger. However, Jesus came to restore what was lost, correct relationship between man and God and between men.

God made man to be in God’s image, to reflect his glory, but man has turned from God and made himself god. Of course we are to love one another but we are to love God above all (Gen.1:26; 1 Cor.1:20-21) The world's definition of love and peace is misguided and wrong.

God made man to exercise stewardship over the earth, to tend and care for creation. Of course we are to care for the earth, but man has made the created order his god when we should be tending it in obedience to the God who made us and placed us in it (Gen.1:26; Ro.1:23) The world's understanding of naturalism is well-intentioned but wrong-headed.

God made man to know and worship Him and enjoy Him forever, but man has turned his back on God to follow his own agenda. Self-help has replaced dependence on God who made us, and the result is conflict and disaster (1 Cor.10:31; 1 Cor.1:20-21) The world's misuse of the power and authority God has given us is reaping the whirlwind.

There will be conflict but for those who know Him there is always peace.

Through the babe in Bethlehem we can know right relationship, responsibility under God, and the peace and joy of unfettered access to God. But when we declare our intent to follow after the only one that can bring these things we set ourselves against those who reject God’s ways, misunderstand and misuse love, nature, and worship; even among our families.

Thus He brings a sword because every worldly expression of confidence, ideology, cult or religion is an expression of man’s futile attempt to find his own way, be his own god, and follow his own agenda. When that agenda comes up against the truth, the kingdom, and its people, there will be conflict.

Many will make Him in their image again this year while others will sentimentalise or complain about Christmas. Perhaps the best witness we can give to the truthfulness of the Christmas message is to, ourselves, submit to His kingship.

For their sake, we must be prepared to take up our cross and lose our lives in Him and, ultimately of course, for His sake (Matt.10:38-39). There will be conflict but for those who know Him there is always peace.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

By
In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

By
The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...
70 comments
Read more

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

By
The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...
18 comments
Read more