Skip to main content

Marks of a Cult - 3

 


My wife was brought up in The Salvation Army and from a young age she heard about the dangers of alcohol, gambling, and drugs. She was told that these were things used by the Devil to rob people of life. A trip to The Salvation Army hostel proved the point. Many there had turned to alcohol, gambling, or drugs and in doing so, they have had their lives devastated by a destructive habit. It is true that the Devil comes to steal, kill, and destroy.

My wife is no longer a member of The Salvation Army, but that which she was taught has remained with her. She has never drunk alcohol, gambled or taken non-prescriptive drugs.

Now let me explain a little. Though at one time my wife would have advocated that all Christians should be teetotal (and I would agree that this is not a bad thing), she would now say that the odd drink in moderation can be okay. Though at one time she would have said that all gambling is wrong for the Christian (and I would agree that this is not a bad thing), she would now say that buying the odd raffle ticket will not mean a person will end up as a member of Gambler’s Anonymous.

Though my spouse and I believe there are some good reasons for Christians to abstain from alcohol and gambling, the real reason my wife had a problem with these things is because they were linked to the Devil. There is no way she would want to do anything that was of the ‘Devil’. Why would she? She does not want to fall into the devil’s trap!

Where is this going?

Now to avert potential misunderstanding, and hopefully avoid a backlash, let me make clear what I am doing here. In using my wife’s upbringing in The Salvation Army, I am in no way disparaging her (I would not dare) or them (they do a great work), but rather I wish to illustrate a point.  If we are told that something is of the Devil, and it truly is, we would want to avoid it at all costs, but what if we have been told that something is of the Devil, and it isn’t? What if you have been told your entire life that a certain person, a certain place, a certain practice is of the Devil, but they are not, what do you do?

Locks

Many who escape cults do so with baggage. They may be free from the physical influence of the cult, but the mental and emotional locks can remain firmly in place. Imagine a group told you that those who have previously left them, are now being used by the Devil to pull you away. Would you, after leaving the group, want to seek out such as these? What if you have been taught that ‘organised religion’ is of the Devil, that churches are demonic and pagan, and that God will soon destroy them; would you upon leaving the group make a beeline for your local church? That is the last thing you would want to do. Things that you have been taught whilst in the cults are not easily shaken off when you leave. Beliefs can persist long after leaving the group and even after becoming a Christian.

Ex-cultist Janis Hutchinson recalls a time when a lady who had left a cult and converted to Christ came to see her:

“No one knows the anguish I am going through trying to adjust to Christianity…I feel like a horse is tied to my right brain and another to my left, and both are taking off in opposite directions. I’m in such a state of turmoil, I think I’m losing my mind! At night I pace the floor weeping, asking myself, Why is this happening to me? Why can’t I sleep? Am I going crazy?”[1]

 Help

I was recently contacted by a person leaving the Jehovah’s Witnesses. He wanted to talk to someone but, as I had previously associated with the group, he wasn’t sure he should talk to me. He told me how it had taken him some time to get enough courage to even get in touch with me. After reassuring him that I knew where he was coming from and what he was going through, he agreed to speak to me. He was sure he had done the right thing in leaving the group, but he was unsure of what the future holds. Can he still trust God? Is it okay to go to church? He is on a journey but slowly but surely, he is getting there.

When an ex-cult member contacts a Christian, they will often be full of conflicting emotions, and we need to be aware of that. We can often feel ill-equipped to help them, so we are tempted to either hope that they will figure things out and ‘get there in the end’ or try to pack them off to somewhere they can receive ‘professional help’. It may be that some do need specialised counselling, but that does not mean that we cannot help.

How can we help those leaving coercive controlling groups? Here are ten suggestions from Janis Hutchinson:[2]

1. Be conscious of the emotional state of the cultist.

2. Do not take it personally of the cultist does not immediately relate to you.

3. If the cultist is willing to meet you in your home, do not pressure her to attend church, other than a gentle invitation.

4. Do not rush the cultist into commitment to Christ.

5. Be aware that some cultists who have already left their cult may not be seeking Christ.

6. Do not indulge in negative talk by blurting out where he is wrong and how wicked his cult is.

7. Never relax your attentions by assuming the cultist’s contact with you means he has given up on his cult.

8. At a point where you think he is ready, have the new believer denounce cult writings and cult leaders and rid his home of cult literature.

9. Be prepared to give up your time.

10. Communicate respect.

Janis explains more fully what she means by these points, and if you are interested in this area of ministry, I would recommend her book to you.

Above all, I would say that patience, love and understanding are key in supporting ex-cult members. Here at Reachout Trust we long to support those who were once  lost in falsehood to find true freedom in Christ.



[1] Out of the Cults Into the Church (Kregel Publications, Grand Rapids 1994) – Janis Hutchinson p.18

[2] Ibid p.182-183

Comments

Unknown said…
This is very helpful especially how to talk with an ex cultist. Thank you.

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...