Skip to main content

Marks of a Cult - 3

 


My wife was brought up in The Salvation Army and from a young age she heard about the dangers of alcohol, gambling, and drugs. She was told that these were things used by the Devil to rob people of life. A trip to The Salvation Army hostel proved the point. Many there had turned to alcohol, gambling, or drugs and in doing so, they have had their lives devastated by a destructive habit. It is true that the Devil comes to steal, kill, and destroy.

My wife is no longer a member of The Salvation Army, but that which she was taught has remained with her. She has never drunk alcohol, gambled or taken non-prescriptive drugs.

Now let me explain a little. Though at one time my wife would have advocated that all Christians should be teetotal (and I would agree that this is not a bad thing), she would now say that the odd drink in moderation can be okay. Though at one time she would have said that all gambling is wrong for the Christian (and I would agree that this is not a bad thing), she would now say that buying the odd raffle ticket will not mean a person will end up as a member of Gambler’s Anonymous.

Though my spouse and I believe there are some good reasons for Christians to abstain from alcohol and gambling, the real reason my wife had a problem with these things is because they were linked to the Devil. There is no way she would want to do anything that was of the ‘Devil’. Why would she? She does not want to fall into the devil’s trap!

Where is this going?

Now to avert potential misunderstanding, and hopefully avoid a backlash, let me make clear what I am doing here. In using my wife’s upbringing in The Salvation Army, I am in no way disparaging her (I would not dare) or them (they do a great work), but rather I wish to illustrate a point.  If we are told that something is of the Devil, and it truly is, we would want to avoid it at all costs, but what if we have been told that something is of the Devil, and it isn’t? What if you have been told your entire life that a certain person, a certain place, a certain practice is of the Devil, but they are not, what do you do?

Locks

Many who escape cults do so with baggage. They may be free from the physical influence of the cult, but the mental and emotional locks can remain firmly in place. Imagine a group told you that those who have previously left them, are now being used by the Devil to pull you away. Would you, after leaving the group, want to seek out such as these? What if you have been taught that ‘organised religion’ is of the Devil, that churches are demonic and pagan, and that God will soon destroy them; would you upon leaving the group make a beeline for your local church? That is the last thing you would want to do. Things that you have been taught whilst in the cults are not easily shaken off when you leave. Beliefs can persist long after leaving the group and even after becoming a Christian.

Ex-cultist Janis Hutchinson recalls a time when a lady who had left a cult and converted to Christ came to see her:

“No one knows the anguish I am going through trying to adjust to Christianity…I feel like a horse is tied to my right brain and another to my left, and both are taking off in opposite directions. I’m in such a state of turmoil, I think I’m losing my mind! At night I pace the floor weeping, asking myself, Why is this happening to me? Why can’t I sleep? Am I going crazy?”[1]

 Help

I was recently contacted by a person leaving the Jehovah’s Witnesses. He wanted to talk to someone but, as I had previously associated with the group, he wasn’t sure he should talk to me. He told me how it had taken him some time to get enough courage to even get in touch with me. After reassuring him that I knew where he was coming from and what he was going through, he agreed to speak to me. He was sure he had done the right thing in leaving the group, but he was unsure of what the future holds. Can he still trust God? Is it okay to go to church? He is on a journey but slowly but surely, he is getting there.

When an ex-cult member contacts a Christian, they will often be full of conflicting emotions, and we need to be aware of that. We can often feel ill-equipped to help them, so we are tempted to either hope that they will figure things out and ‘get there in the end’ or try to pack them off to somewhere they can receive ‘professional help’. It may be that some do need specialised counselling, but that does not mean that we cannot help.

How can we help those leaving coercive controlling groups? Here are ten suggestions from Janis Hutchinson:[2]

1. Be conscious of the emotional state of the cultist.

2. Do not take it personally of the cultist does not immediately relate to you.

3. If the cultist is willing to meet you in your home, do not pressure her to attend church, other than a gentle invitation.

4. Do not rush the cultist into commitment to Christ.

5. Be aware that some cultists who have already left their cult may not be seeking Christ.

6. Do not indulge in negative talk by blurting out where he is wrong and how wicked his cult is.

7. Never relax your attentions by assuming the cultist’s contact with you means he has given up on his cult.

8. At a point where you think he is ready, have the new believer denounce cult writings and cult leaders and rid his home of cult literature.

9. Be prepared to give up your time.

10. Communicate respect.

Janis explains more fully what she means by these points, and if you are interested in this area of ministry, I would recommend her book to you.

Above all, I would say that patience, love and understanding are key in supporting ex-cult members. Here at Reachout Trust we long to support those who were once  lost in falsehood to find true freedom in Christ.



[1] Out of the Cults Into the Church (Kregel Publications, Grand Rapids 1994) – Janis Hutchinson p.18

[2] Ibid p.182-183

Comments

Unknown said…
This is very helpful especially how to talk with an ex cultist. Thank you.

Popular posts from this blog

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

The Times of the Gentiles - by Dawn Partington

Jehovah's Witnesses teach that “the times of the gentiles” is a time period of 2,520 years, beginning in 607BC and ending in AD1914. According to their doctrine, Jesus was enthroned as King in AD1914 when the “gentile times” ended. 1. Only one verse in scripture mentions “the times of the gentiles”: 'They will fall by the sword and will be taken as prisoners to all the nations. Jerusalem will be trampled on by the Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled.'  Luke 21:24 NIV. The Jehovah's Witness organisation has linked this one verse with other prophetic passages to calculate the supposed length of these “gentile times”, notably a time period which began hundreds of years before the incarnation and ended over 1900 years after it. 2. Simple examination of the text of Luke 21 reveals what Jesus was referring to when he used the phrase “the times of the gentiles”. Let's look at the passage together and distil this into four points which you may...

Resurrection or Cloning?

  In the film “The Sixth Day”, based in the near future where cloning of pets is allowed but not of humans, the main character, Adam, played by Arnold Schwarzenegger, wakes up in a taxi, not knowing how he got there.   He travels home only to see another man inside with his family; this man looks exactly like him.   Before being able to confront the imposter, Adam is attacked by unknown assailants and has to run.   This being an Arnie movie there are lots of shoot outs and the body count is high as Adam attempts to find out what is going on. It turns out that he has been cloned and the cloning company is trying to clear up the loose ends.   Spoiler alert; it turns out he is the clone and the other Adam is the original.   The story highlights some problems with the Watchtower’s ideas about ‘resurrection’.   They teach that, at death, who we are ceases to exist; there is no soul or spirit that survives death, nothing of our essence continues on. ...