Skip to main content

THE GOD OF MORMONISM (Part 1)

 

Even though secularism is on the rise in the West, it is not very difficult to find someone who will say that they believe in the existence of God. Who, or what that God is remains a different question. Some will say that they believe someone, or something is out-there, but they have no idea who or what it is. Others will perhaps describe a God made in their own likeness, often a God that suits their own desires and beliefs. Whilst others may insist that they believe in the God espoused by one of the world’s major religions.

Does God exist? Who is this God and how can we know what God is like?

THE BIBLE

The Bible does not seek to explain the existence of God, but rather plainly states that God is. What then follows throughout the pages of the Bible is an unfolding revelation of this God and, as His nature and attributes are revealed, a doctrine of God is formulated. It is this doctrine that has been accepted and believed upon within Christianity for the last two thousand years. 

The question this brief two-part article seeks to address is this: how does the Mormon doctrine of God compare with the historic biblical doctrine of God? Do Mormons and Bible believing Christians trust in and worship the same God?

A DIFFERENT GOD

‘Some who write anti-Mormon pamphlets insist the Latter-day Saint concept of Deity is contrary to what is recognised as traditional Christian doctrine. In this they are quite correct’[1]

I have spoken to many Mormons who tell me that the God that they worship is no different to the God that I worship. They can appear greatly offended by my suggestion that we do not. Now I would consider that most Mormons honestly believe that the God they trust in is the same God found in the pages of the Bible. If they do, I would like to suggest there are three reasons for this.

i)           They are ignorant of what the Bible teaches about God.

ii)         They are ignorant of what Latter-day Saint leaders have taught, and continue to teach, about God.

iii)        They are sold on the idea that The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is the true and restored Church, so whatever their leaders say is true, regardless of what the Bible says.

Let us consider some major differences between the God of Mormonism and the God of biblical Christianity. Are we worshipping the same God?

THUS SAYETH THE MORMON LEADERS

Former Mormon President Gordon B. Hinckley said the following:

‘Other people do not understand the true nature of God. They are still bound by the old Nicene Creed of the fourth century, which I cannot understand. But we have a perfect knowledge of the nature of God that has come through the First Vision of the Prophet Joseph.’[2]

So, what is the true and perfect knowledge of the nature of God revealed by the Prophet Joseph?

Firstly, Joseph taught that God has a body of flesh and bones.

‘The Father has a body of flesh and bones as tangible as man’s… (Doctrine & Covenants 130:22)

Mormons believe that God, whom they call Heavenly Father, came into existence in the same manner as each of us. He, like the rest of us, was the offspring of a Heavenly Father and one of his wives. He was then ‘born into mortality’ on another planet, where he sufficiently lived out his plan of salvation, enabling him to become a God himself. Thus, he is now the God of this planet.

Where is all that in the Bible?

It was this God who, according to the first vision account, appeared to young Joseph in that ‘sacred grove’; a God who had the appearance of a man with a body of flesh and bones.

This is not the God of the Bible.

THE ETERNALITY OF GOD

Before the mountains were brought forth, or ever thou hadst formed the earth and the world, even from everlasting to everlasting, thou art God. Psalm 90:2

Thy throne is established of old: thou art from everlasting. Psalm 93:2

According to the Bible, God has always been God. There wasn’t a time when He didn’t exist. The Mormon belief that God was once a sinful man who became a God is nowhere found in the Bible.  Bizarrely, the Book of Mormon agrees with the Bible and so disagrees with Mormon doctrine:

For I know that God is not a partial God, neither a changeable being; but he is unchangeable from all eternity to all eternity.  Moroni 8:18

Moroni 8:18 states that God is not a ‘changeable being’. This leads to a further issue, that of the immutability of God.

THE IMMUTABILITY OF GOD

But thou art the same, and thy years shall have no end. Psalm 102:27

Like Psalm 102:27, Moroni 8:18 clearly teaches the immutability of God, that is that God is unchangeable. Elsewhere the Book of Mormon says:

 And if there were miracles wrought then, why has God ceased to be a God of miracles and yet be an unchangeable Being? And behold, I say unto you he changeth not; if so he would cease to be God; and he ceaseth not to be God, and is a God of miracles.  Mormon 9:19

What are honest Mormons to do with these clear verses that teach that God does not change? Should they believe what the Bible and Book of Mormon communicates about the nature of God, or should they believe Mormon doctrine?

God is not a changeable being, and in this we find great comfort. It means we can take Him at His Word. Imagine, if God could change. Nothing would be secure or assured. He may love me today, but not tomorrow. He may forgive me one minute but hold me accountable the next. But we see that the Bible teaches that God does not change. He is, and always has been, the constant, steadfast, trustworthy God.

But thou, O Lord, art a God full of compassion, and gracious, long suffering, and plenteous in mercy and truth.  Psalm 86:15

Not so for the God of Mormonism.

Theirs is a God that hasn’t always been God, therefore he is not immutable. The Mormon God being partial to change can offer no real lasting comfort, nor hope.

This is not the God of the Bible.

In part 2, I will continue to consider the God of Mormonism.



[1] A Sure Foundation: Answers to Difficult Gospel Questions (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co. 1988), 93

[2] Ensign, February 2007, p.8


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...