Skip to main content

Is Jesus the Archangel Michael?

 


Watchtower Wednesday last week drew some really good answers and I will gratefully incorporate them into my answer to this question today. The Watch Tower Society answer is an emphatic 'Yes!' of course, using Daniel 10:13, 21; Daniel 12:1; Jude 9; and 1 Thessalonians 4:16 as evidence.

After all, isn't it Michael who fights for the people of God (Daniel 12:1)? isn't Jesus described by Paul as 'coming with the voice of an archangel' (1 Thess.4:16)?


Archangels

It is always good to ask where in the Bible do we find the ‘reasoning’ presented to us by a Jehovah’s Witness. Nowhere does the Bible tell us the archangel Michael is Jesus...nowhere. Nowhere do the Bible writers present the convoluted and flawed reasoning of the Watch Tower on this and many other issues. Let’s be confident in what the Bible says, and what it doesn’t say.

Michael is one of four archangels, angels of high rank. In Daniel 10:13 he is described as ‘one of the chief princes.’ The archangel Michael has high ranking equals. The article I cited fails to mention this fact. Of course, Jehovah’s Witnesses can only have one archangel because Jesus has a unique status and place in the purposes of God.

One of the great rebellions in Scripture is the rebellion of angels (2 Peter 2:5; 1 Peter 3:20) ‘who did not stay within their own position of authority, but left their proper dwelling…’ (Jude 6) Jude goes on to write of an angel who was faithful in staying in his proper dwelling, within the limits of his authority:

But when the archangel Michael, contending with the devil, was disputing about the body of Moses, he did not presume to pronounce a blasphemous judgement, but said, ‘The Lord rebuke you.’ (Jude 9)

Jesus’ words to Peter clearly demonstrate he has authority in himself to rebuke the devil (Mt.16:23). Indeed, Jesus has authority over life and death (John 10:17,18) something archangels do not have, authority to cast down ‘the god if this world,’ (John.12:31) A cursory reading of the gospels shows Jesus consistently speaking in his own name, by his own authority, for instance, ‘You have heard it was said...but I say to you…’ (Mt.5) Was the archangel Michael being presumptuous here?

It is also the case that Watch Tower teaching has a created being saving creation, effectively creation saving itself. He may be ‘The Greatest Man who Ever Lived’ but still creation cannot save itself.


The Voice of an Archangel?

A favourite text is 1 Thess.4:16,’For the Lord himself will descend from heaven with a cry of command, with the voice of an archangel, and with the sound of the trumpet of God.’ Here, they reason, the Lord has ‘the voice of an archangel’ therefore he must be an archangel. The text also talks about ‘the sound of the trumpet of God.’ If the voice of an archangel makes him an archangel does the trumpet of God make Jesus God?

Clearly this means the Lord is accompanied by the sound of the trumpet of God. In the same way, he is accompanied by the voice of an archangel. The book of Revelation, so beloved (in part) by Jehovah’s Witnesses, makes clear the meaning of the archangel’s voice:

Then I looked, and behold, a white cloud, and seated on the cloud one like a son of man, with a golden crown on his head, and a sharp sickle in his hand. And another angel came out of the temple, (get ready now, here it comes) calling with a loud voice to him who sat on the cloud, ‘put in your sickle, and reap…’ (Rev.14:14-16)


But to the Son...

Hebrews makes clear the difference between archangels and Jesus Christ:

To which of his angels did God ever say, You are my Son, today I have begotten you?’ (Surely, for a JW, the answer is ‘Michael’)

Of the angels he says, ‘He makes his angels winds, and his ministers a flame of fire’ But to the Son he says, ‘Your throne, O God, is forever and ever’...and ‘You, Lord, laid the foundation of the earth in the beginning, and the heavens are the work of your hands…’

And to which of his angels has he ever said, ‘Sit at my right hand until I make your enemies a footstool for your feet?’

Are they (angels) not ministering spirits, sent out to serve for the sake of those who are to inherit salvation? (Heb.1)

It was not to angels that God subjected the world to come…’ (Heb.2:5)

Angels are, indeed, ministering spirits, as clearly evidenced in Daniel when the archangel flew from God’s throne the moment Daniel’s prayer was heard (Dan.10:12).

Jesus is something else altogether. He is ‘the Word’ that pre-existed creation (Jn.1:1) who created ‘all things’ (Jn.1:3) having life in himself (Jn.1:4), the power to grant it (Jn.11, esp. v.25), to lay it down, and to take it up (Jn.10:17,18). ‘In him all the fullness of deity dwells bodily…’ (Col.2:9)


Conclusion

He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation. For by him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities—all things were created through him and for him. And he is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church. He is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead, that in everything he might be pre-eminent. For in him all the fullness of God was pleased to dwell, and through him to reconcile to himself all things, whether on earth or in heaven, making peace by the blood of his cross.’ Col.1:15-20)

Of course, we know the Watch Tower interferes with this text among many others, but for more on this and to see my previous posts on this issue see:

How can Jesus be Jehovah?

How can Jesus be ‘with God’ and be God? (Jn.1:1)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...