Skip to main content

Is God a Trinity?



Jehovah's Witnesses are known for their Unitarian doctrine of God. Utterly rejecting the Trinity doctrine of the Christian Church, they insist:

'Many Christian denominations teach that God is a Trinity. However, note what the EncyclopƦdia Britannica states: ā€œNeither the word Trinity nor the explicit doctrine appears in the New Testament. . .The doctrine developed gradually over several centuries and through many controversies.ā€ In fact, the God of the Bible is never described as being part of a Trinity.'

We begin with a point I never tire of making, and that I made in my last post. I think of the generations of theologians, teachers, and leaders who have studied such things in great depth. Does the Watch Tower Society, which discourages further and higher education in favour of door-knocking, think it knows better?

This no more true than when it comes to the nature of God. Do Jehovahā€™s Witnesses think the answer to this question is there to be had by anyone who cracks open a Bible and takes its ā€˜plain meaning?ā€™ Letā€™s seeā€¦


In the Nameā€¦

Jesus commissioned his disciples to make disciples, ā€˜baptising them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spiritā€¦ā€™ (Mt.28:19)

Peter, standing before the council of rulers, elders, and scribes, declared, ā€˜This Jesus is the stone that was rejected by you, the builders, which has become the cornerstone. And there is salvation in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.ā€™ (Acts 4:11,12)

ā€˜Nameā€™ in these texts, į½„Ī½ĪæĪ¼Ī± onoma, means a given name. Jesus doesnā€™t say ā€˜namesā€™ but uses the singular ā€˜name.ā€™ Following Jesusā€™ clear teaching, Peter uses the singular ā€˜nameā€™ rather than names. This is a Trinity reference as all three members of the godhead have the one name. It is an indication of Jesusā€™ deity. It is sometimes argued that ā€˜nameā€™ means authority, but the primary meaning of onoma indicates a personal name.

When Jesus speaks ā€˜as one having authorityā€™ (Mt.7:29) he clearly says, ā€˜...you have heard that it was said...but I say to youā€¦ā€™ (Mt.5) All the prophets spoke what they heard from God, the apostles spoke what they heard from Jesus, but Jesus spoke in his own name. We are baptised in the name of the three, there is no other name by which we are saved, and Jesus used that name as his own.

In John 3:16 Jesus is typically described in our Bibles as the ā€˜Only Begotten Sonā€™ (KJV), ā€˜only Sonā€™ (ESV), ā€˜only-begotten Sonā€™ (NWT). This has rather muddied the water and opened the door for the cults to claim either Jesus is a son in the human sense and so canā€™t the God he is the son of, or Jesus is one god among many. Islam, of course makes something of this, insisting ā€˜God cannot have a sonā€™ and this is not wrong. The Greek Ī¼ĪæĪ½ĪæĪ³ĪµĪ½į½µĻ‚ monogenēs is better translated ā€˜one of a kind, unique.ā€™ God is the kind, the Bible tells us there is no other God (Is.44:6-8), and that Jesus is that kind (Jn. 3:16). Paul goes so far as to tells us that in Christ, ā€˜the whole fullness of deity dwells bodilyā€¦ā€™ (Col.2:9)

John, in his gospel, describes Jesus as making his dwelling among us (Jn.1:14). The Greek ĻƒĪŗĪ·Ī½į½¹Ļ‰ skēnoō better translates as ā€˜pitched his tent among usā€™ or, ā€˜tabernacled among us,ā€™ which takes us back to Exodus when God literally ā€˜pitched his tent,ā€™ or, ā€˜tabernacledā€™ among his called out people. Jesus is God come to call out a people ā€˜from every nation, tribe, and tongue,ā€™ (Rev.7:9, cf Gal.3:28) so he may dwell among them (Jn.14:23).


Trinity

The early church and its leaders held councils to address the challenge of heresies, the first we have a record of being the Jerusalem Council in Acts 15. Here they tackled the challenge of those who would take Christian believers back to the law. The deity of Jesus was an established doctrine long before the much misrepresented Council of Nicea, which was convened to defend that established doctrine; not to make Jesus God but to defend the doctrine that he is God. If you want to give some time to better understanding these issues you would profit from the teaching of Dr. Michael Heiser on the early doctrine of the Trinity.

It was the Carthaginian lawyer Tertullian (155-220AD), who converted to Christianity at age 35, first used the Latin word Trinity (trinitas). at a time when Latin was overtaking Greek as the language of the empire. He is remembered as the father of Latin Christianity, also famous for giving us the terms Old Testament (vetus testamentum) and New Testament (novum testamentum).

ā€˜Be confirmed in the decrees of the Lord and of the Apostles, in order that in everything you do, you may prosper in body and in soul, in faith and in love, in Son and in Father and in Spirit.ā€™ Ignatius of Antioch 110 AD

ā€˜
It is inescapable that this [man] is the Christ of God...that He pre-existed as the Son of the Creator of all things, being God, and that He was born a man by the Virgin.ā€™ Justin Martyr, (100 to 165 AD)

ā€˜
Being God and likewise perfect man, He (Christ) gave positive indications of His two natures: Of His deity, by the miracles during the three years following after His Baptism; of His humanity, in the thirty years which came before His Baptism, during which, by reason of His condition according to the flesh, He concealed the signs of His deity, although He was the true God existing before the ages.ā€™ Melito of Sardes 177 AD

ā€˜
The Son of God is the Word of the Father, in thought and in actuality. By Him and through Him all things were made, the Father and the Son being one. Since the Son is IN the Father and the Father is IN the Son by the unity and power of the Spirit, the Mind and Word of the Father is the Son of God. And if, in your exceedingly great wisdom, it occurs to you to inquire what is meant by 'the Son', I will tell you briefly: He is the First-begotten of the Father, not as having been produced -- for from the beginning God had the Word in Himself... Who, then, would not be astonished to hear those called atheists, who speak of God the Father and of God the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and who proclaim their power in union and their distinction in order.ā€™ Athenagoras of Athens 180 AD

ā€˜The Word, then, the Christ, is the cause both of our ancient beginning - for He was in God - and of our well-being. And now this same Word has appeared as man. He alone is both God and man.ā€™ Clement of Alexandria (about150 to 216 AD)

ā€˜For it is the Trinity alone which exceeds every sense in which not only temporal but even eternal may be understood. It is all other things, indeed, which are outside the Trinity, which are to be measured by time and ages.... It seems right to inquire into the reason why he who is 'born again through God' to salvation has need of both Father and Son and Holy Spirit and will not obtain salvation apart from the entire Trinity, and why it is impossible to become partaker of the Father or the Son without the Holy Spirit. In discussing these points it will undoubtedly be necessary to describe the activity which is peculiar to the Holy Spirit and that which is peculiar to the Father and Son.ā€™ Origen (c 225 AD)

Tertullian used ā€˜Trinityā€™, not to describe a novel doctrine but, in the spirit of those early church councils, to reinforce an accepted teaching. He encapsulated for the ordinary believer in this one word the established doctrine of the church. Tertullian was an early Christian apologist who went on to write the earliest and most extensive defence of the post apostolic faith of the early church. His work is found in the collection of the writings of the Patrologia Latina, the Early Church Fathers

Comments

BarryJ saidā€¦
JWs discount the doctrine of the trinity due to it not being in place until the councils in the 4th century, so they allege. But they are happy to accept the doctrine of Jesusā€™ invisible ā€˜presenceā€™ that didnā€™t come in to existence until the 20th century as well as the idea that Jesus is the archangel Michael that didnā€™t exist before the 20th century either!

Popular posts from this blog

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

The Times of the Gentiles - by Dawn Partington

Jehovah's Witnesses teach that ā€œthe times of the gentilesā€ is a time period of 2,520 years, beginning in 607BC and ending in AD1914. According to their doctrine, Jesus was enthroned as King in AD1914 when the ā€œgentile timesā€ ended. 1. Only one verse in scripture mentions ā€œthe times of the gentilesā€: 'They will fall by the sword and will be taken as prisoners to all the nations. Jerusalem will be trampled on by the Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled.'  Luke 21:24 NIV. The Jehovah's Witness organisation has linked this one verse with other prophetic passages to calculate the supposed length of these ā€œgentile timesā€, notably a time period which began hundreds of years before the incarnation and ended over 1900 years after it. 2. Simple examination of the text of Luke 21 reveals what Jesus was referring to when he used the phrase ā€œthe times of the gentilesā€. Let's look at the passage together and distil this into four points which you may...

How Will Jehovah Forgive Us

  The June 2022 Watchtower Article 24 titled ā€œ Jehovahā€”The Greatest Forgiver ā€ attempts to paint a picture of Jehovah as a wise, just, and knowledgeable judge ā€“ which, of course He is.  However, it also shows Him as a judge who has a number of requirements before He will forgive.  The article quotes numerous Old Testament scriptures showing that Jehovah will forgive our transgressions and agrees that this forgiveness is made possible through Jesus dying for our sins, though it doesnā€™t mention the covenant this sacrifice generated. As Christians we would understand that Jesusā€™ sacrifice, the shedding of His blood, pays for our sins so that a just God can be merciful and forgive them; the price for those sins has already been paid (1 Cor 6 v 20, Heb 9 v 22). In contrast, the Watchtower article talks of there being other requirements for Jehovahā€™s forgiveness.  It states that, before Jehovah will decide to offer forgiveness, ā€œ He needs to be able to consider...