Skip to main content

WHO DO YOU SAY THAT I AM? THE ‘JESUS’ OF THE JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES

 


Brothers, my heart's desire and prayer to God for them is that they may be saved. For I bear them witness that they have a zeal for God, but not according to knowledge. For, being ignorant of the righteousness of God, and seeking to establish their own, they did not submit to God's righteousness. For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes.  (Romans 10:1-4 ESV)

There is a vast difference between knowing someone and knowing about someone. For example, upon meeting for the first time a footballer from my favourite team, I may be able to dazzle him with my knowledge of how many clubs he has played for and how many goals he has scored. I could further impress him by naming his wife and children and perhaps freak him out a little, as I can tell him what kind of car he drives and recite his registration plate.

Though this may impress him, and worry him in equal measure, he would probably say: ‘Excuse me. Who are you?’ You see as much as I know about him, I do not know him – and he does not know me!

I mention this because it is applicable to the subject under consideration namely the Jesus of the Jehovah’s Witnesses.

 IT’S ALL IN YOUR HEAD

According to the Jehovah’s Witnesses, everlasting life is contingent upon a person knowing the truth about Jesus.

‘…if you know the truth about Jehovah and Jesus, you can live forever on a paradise earth. (John 14:6) Also, knowing about Jesus will help because he is the best example of how to live and treat others. (John 13:34, 35).’[1]

My testimony is that as a Jehovah’s Witness, I knew about Jesus, but I did not know him. I could tell you about his life, where he was born, who his parents were, and who baptised him. I could talk endlessly about his miracles, his death, and his resurrection. I could quote chapter and verse yes, I knew a lot about him, but I did not know him.

This changed the moment I was born again by the Spirit of God. It was then that head knowledge became heart knowledge. I no longer just knew about him – I knew him!

I now know Jesus. I know he is alive; I know he has forgiven my sin; I know that he has saved me and, importantly, I know that Jesus knows me.

One of the favourite verses used by Jehovah’s Witnesses is John 17 verse 3.

“This means everlasting life, their coming to know you, the only true God, and the one whom you sent, Jesus Christ.” (John 17:3 - New World Translation 2013)

The Jehovah’s Witnesses teach that salvation is not attained through a relationship with Jesus Christ, but rather by having ‘accurate knowledge’ of him and, of course, they alone have that accurate knowledge.

SPOT THE DIFFERENCE

It may have been because many like me have discussed and challenged their understanding of John 17:3, that brought about the change in the 2013 revision of the New World Translation. Before the ‘silver sword’[2] appeared, the 1984 edition translated John 17:3 like this:

This means everlasting life, their taking in knowledge of you, the only true God, and of the one whom you sent forth, Jesus Christ. (John 17:3 - New World Translation 1984 Edition)

Did you spot the difference? They have changed: ‘their taking in knowledge of you’ (1984) to ‘their coming to know you’ (2013), thus bringing the NWT in line with mainstream translations. But let us not be fooled by this cover up. They have by no means conceded their error and changed their teaching; they still believe that ‘accurate knowledge’ is needed to have any chance of being saved. Note the footnote attached to John 17:3 in the 2013 revision:

 


I would certainly agree with the Jehovah’s Witnesses, that a person needs to have the ‘right’ Jesus. Who we believe Jesus to be will determine our eternal destiny. A false Jesus cannot save. 

Let us therefore imagine Jesus asking a Jehovah’s Witness the question: ‘Who do you say that I am?’ What would they say?

THE WATCHTOWER JESUS

Jehovah’s Witnesses believe that Jesus began life as a spirit creature, created by Jehovah; so, to them Jesus is not eternal. Jesus was Jehovah’s first creation, so, to them Jesus is not God. Before coming to earth Jesus was Michael the Archangel; so, to them Jesus is an angel.

Jesus somehow left his angelic status behind when he entered Mary’s womb as a human.

Jesus was a perfect sinless man, but he was only a man; so, to them Jesus is neither divine, nor the second person of the Trinity. They reject that Jesus was God in the flesh.

They teach that Jesus was just a man who did not become the Christ until his baptism. After fulfilling his ministry Jesus was put to death, not on a cross, but rather an upright pole they call a torture stake.

After being laid in a tomb, Jehovah dissolved Jesus’ body[3] and he became non-existent. Three days later Jehovah ‘recreated’ (for there was nothing left to resurrect) the Archangel Michael who then, over the next forty days, appeared in different bodies to various people; so, to them Jesus was raised spiritually not physically.

Jesus (or should we say Michael) then returned to Jehovah and since 1914 he has ruled from heaven. He will never again be seen visibly on the earth.

A DIFFERENT JESUS

It is clear to see that the Jesus of the Jehovah’s Witnesses, is hugely different to the Jesus of historical, biblical Christianity. In contending that they have the right Jesus, the Witnesses seek to condemn those who have a bible but who do not possess accurate knowledge.

From their article: Accurate Knowledge to Please Jehovah they say this of Christendom:  

While they do possess the Bible, God’s written revelation of his will for our day, they lack accurate knowledge. The inspired apostle aptly expresses the situation when he says: “Although they knew God, they did not glorify him as God nor did they thank him, but they became empty-headed in their reasonings and their unintelligent heart became darkened. Although asserting they were wise, they became foolish and turned the glory of the incorruptible God into something like the image of corruptible man and of birds and four-footed creatures and creeping things. And just as they did not approve of holding God in accurate knowledge, God gave them up to a disapproved mental state, to do the things not fitting.” (Rom. 1:21-23, 28NWT)[4]

Sadly, unbeknown to them, these verses speak of the Jehovah’s Witnesses. It is they who are lacking accurate knowledge.

The Jesus of the Jehovah’s Witnesses is a false Jesus who cannot save them.



[1] Who Is Jesus Christ? Is Jesus God or God’s Son? (jw.org)

[2] The Silver Sword is what the Jehovah’s Witnesses affectionately call their 2013 revised New World Translation

[3] The Watchtower, Sept. 1, 1953, page 518. “JESUS’ FLESHLY BODY DISSOLVED. What happened to the perfect fleshly body of Jesus after his death? Was it preserved so that in time men will look upon it in worship? or does Jesus still have this fleshly body in the heavens, ‘spiritualized’ so that it can be seen and worshiped? Neither. The Scriptures answer: It was disposed of by Jehovah God, dissolved into its constituent elements or atoms.”

[4] Accurate Knowledge to Please Jehovah — Watchtower ONLINE LIBRARY (jw.org)


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...