Skip to main content

THE JESUS OF MORMONISM

 




Upon joining my current church, I was keen to get to know people. I had previously been a teacher, so I had experience of quickly getting to grips with names, but on my first Sunday at church, I realised it wasn’t going to be that easy.

After the service I was introduced to not one, not two, not three but four sets of identical twins, and when I say identical, I mean identical.  So closely did one twin resemble the other that, in the style of one of my literary heroes, Sherlock Holmes, I began to scan them for any clues that might help me. I found nothing. They looked the same, sounded the same and even dressed so similarly, that I believed their parents may still be buying their clothes.

Afraid of getting their names wrong, I began to call them ‘brother’ and ‘sister’, (which is the Christian version of calling someone whose name you can’t remember ‘mate’); after all I did not want to offend them, nor embarrass myself.

One set of twins (the lads – the rest were girls), were particularly troublesome. They both got jobs in local supermarkets, and I often bumped into them whilst shopping; but which lad worked in which supermarket? In the end I developed a system to help me. Their names began with L and A. L worked in Asda and D worked in Sainsburys. So, I developed the acronym LADS (L/Asda and D/Sainsbury). Result – but only when I saw them at work!

By sight and speech, I couldn’t tell one twin from another, so what was I to do? Well, I had to spend time with them, learning what set them apart. As I did, I discovered that they had different personalities, different likes and dislikes and I began to tell them apart by just listening to what they said. I had to go beyond the surface and dig a little deeper, so that I could tell them apart.

Nice little story Tony, but what has this got to do with the Mormon Jesus? I’m glad you asked.

Just as I had problems telling the twins apart, so often Christians can have the same problem telling true and false Christians apart. Some ‘false’ Christians look and sound so much like true Christians – that we cannot at first glance, tell them apart.

DIGGING DEEPER

If you were to ask a Mormon about Jesus, they may likely reply along the following lines.

Jesus is my Lord and Saviour.

Jesus is the Son of God.

Jesus was the promised Messiah.

Jesus performed miracles.

Jesus died on a cross and rose physically from the dead.

Jesus, through the atonement, paid for my sin.

Based on those answers, we might assume that Christians and Mormons are ‘identical twins’, but don’t be fooled. Just as I had to dig a little deeper to ‘spot the difference’, we too must do the same with our Mormon friends.

THE MORMON JESUS

As a Church we have critics, many of them. They say we do not believe in the traditional Christ of Christianity. There is some substance to what they say.[1]

Mormons reject the ‘traditional’ Jesus of historic Christianity. They teach that the Jesus of the Churches is, at best, a deformed one; the product of tradition, historical councils, and a Bible that is only as good as far as it has been translated correctly.[2] It was therefore necessary for Heavenly Father to ‘restore’ to the earth, the true Church, and the true Jesus, through the prophet Joseph Smith.

The 15th President of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, Gordon B. Hinckley, was happy to tell the world that theirs is a ‘different’ Jesus:

“In bearing testimony of Jesus Christ, President Hinckley spoke of those outside the Church who say Latter-day Saints ‘do not believe in the traditional Christ.’ ‘No, I don’t. The traditional Christ of whom they speak is not the Christ of whom I speak. For the Christ of whom I speak has been revealed in this the Dispensation of the Fullness of Times. He together with His Father, appeared to the boy Joseph Smith in the year 1820, and when Joseph left the grove that day, he knew more of the nature of God than all the learned ministers of the gospel of the ages.'”[3]

THE MORMON JESUS vs THE TRADITIONAL JESUS

Here are 5 differences between the Jesus of Mormonism and the Jesus of the Bible.

1)The Mormon Jesus is a procreated being. He is the firstborn son of Heavenly Father and one of his wives. 

“Among the spirit-children of Elohim, the firstborn was and is Jehovah or Jesus Christ to whom all others are juniors.”[4]

The Bible teaches that Jesus is uncreated and has existed eternally.

The Apostle Paul said of Jesus:

‘And he is before all things, and in him all things hold together.’  Colossians 1:17

Thomas speaking to Jesus called him God:

‘Thomas said: My Lord and My God’ John 20:28

Jesus declares himself to be without beginning or end:

“Behold, I am coming soon, bringing my recompense with me, to repay each one for what he has done. I am the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the last, the beginning and the end.” Revelation 22:12,13

2)  The Mormon Jesus is the spirit brother of Lucifer.

“Long before you were born a program was developed by your creators. …The principal personalities in this great drama were a Father Elohim, perfect in wisdom, judgment, and person, and two sons, Lucifer and Jehovah.”[5] 

The Bible teaches that Jesus created Lucifer:

For by him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities—all things were created through him and for him.’  (Colossians 1:16)

‘All things were made through him, and without him was not anything made that was made.’ John 1:3

3)  The Mormon Jesus was born to Mary as the result of Heavenly Father having sexual relations with her.

“Christ was begotten by an Immortal Father in the same way that mortal men are begotten by mortal fathers.”[6]

According to Mormon theology, before being born we all existed as the spirit children of Heavenly Father and his wives. Mary was one of these children. To then teach that Heavenly Father came to the now mortal Mary and had sexual relations with her to produce the mortal Jesus, is surely a type of spiritual incest.

This is nowhere found in the Bible. Rather, we read that Mary was told by the angel that:

“The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you.”  Luke 1:35

4)  The Mormon Jesus only atoned for Adam’s sin.

“We believe that men will be punished for their own sins, and not for Adam’s transgression.”[7]

The Bible teaches that Jesus atoned for our sins:

He himself bore our sins in his body on the tree, that we might die to sin and live to righteousness. By his wounds you have been healed. 

1 Peter 2:24   (Bold mine)

For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received: that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the Scriptures…  

1 Corinthians 15:3  (Bold mine)

5)  The Mormon Jesus became a God

“Jesus became a God and reached His great state of understanding through consistent effort and continuous obedience to all the Gospel truths and universal laws.”[8]

The Bible teaches that Jesus is eternally God.

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given; and the government shall be upon his shoulder, and his name shall be called Wonderful Counsellor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.   Isaiah 9:6 (Bold mine)

‘In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.’  John 1:1  (Bold mine)

‘…waiting for our blessed hope, the appearing of the glory of our great God and Saviour Jesus Christ…’  Titus 2:13   (Bold mine)

As can be clearly seen, the Mormon Jesus is not the historical and Biblical Jesus. Theirs is a Jesus who cannot save them.



[1] President Hinckley: We look to Christ - Church News (thechurchnews.com)

[2] LDS – Articles of Faith 8

[3] (LDS Church News Week ending June 20, 1998, p. 7).

[4] James Talmage, Articles of Faith, 425.

[5] Teachings of Spencer W. Kimball, pp32-33, ellipses mine

[6] McConkie, Mormon Doctrine, 546-547.

[7] LDS -Articles of Faith 2

[8] Milton R. Hunter, The Gospel Through the Ages, p.51

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...