Skip to main content

This is a Bible

Image by Pedro Ivo Pereira Vieira Pedin from Pixabay 

When you are struggling with a problem, when your plans don’t seem to be working out, when you wonder, ‘why is this so intractable, have I missed something?’ there is great wisdom in going back to first principles. This is especially true of Bible understanding.

Writing at some length about the priestly role of Jesus, the writer to the Hebrews goes on:

About this we have much to say, and it is hard to explain, since you have become dull of hearing. For though by this time you ought to be teachers, you need someone to teach you again the basic principles of the oracles of God. You need milk, not solid food, for everyone who lives on milk is unskilled in the word of righteousness, since he is a child. But solid food is for the mature, for those who have their powers of discernment trained by constant practice to distinguish good from evil.’ Hebrews 5:11-14

We notice several things in this passage:

  • This is a key teaching, about which much might be said.

  • It is a mature teaching but, ’it is hard to explain…’ because...

  • The readers are ill-prepared to receive it, are, ‘dull of hearing.’

  • The writer is disappointed, ‘by this time you ought to be teachers,’ but faces the facts;

  • They need to go back to first principles, ‘you need someone to teach you again the basic principles of the oracles of God.’

The problem here is, they have been taught the basics, but need to be taught them again. This is censure for people who should know better. It is, and should be, embarrassing for the readers of this letter that they should still need milk because of their immaturity. ‘Solid food,’ they (and we) are told, ‘is for the mature, for those who have the powers of discernment trained by constant practice to distinguish good from evil.’

The power of discernment doesn’t just happen. It isn’t simply telegraphed from the throne in the moment of need, as some would have us believe. The power of discernment, the Bible tells us, is trained by constant practice. James urges:

Be doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving yourselves. For if anyone is a hearer of the word and not a doer, he is like a man who looks intently at his natural face in a mirror. For he looks at himself and goes away and at once forgets what he was like. But the one who looks into the perfect law, the law of liberty, and perseveres, being no hearer who forgets, but a doer who acts, will be blessed in his doing.’ James 1:22-25

Peter writes:

For this very reason, make every effort to add to your faith goodness; and to goodness, knowledge; and to knowledge, self-control; and to self-control, perseverance; and to perseverance, godliness; and to godliness, mutual affection; and to mutual affection, love. For if you possess these qualities in increasing measure, they will keep you from being ineffective and unproductive in your knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ.’ 2 Peter 1:5-8

If we are to be the saints Peter describes, adding virtue to virtue, if we are to be the wise doer of the word James writes about, then we must begin with the word, look into the perfect law of liberty and treasure up in our hearts what we read and hear carrying it into our days,

The tragedy, as we saw in my last post, is that we are awash with Bibles, yet Bible reading is at an all time low. Don’t be misled by recent evidence that the pandemic has driven more people back to their Bibles. This, I am sure, is true but it makes little difference to the shocking Bible illiteracy that marks the church at the beginning of the 21st century.

Indeed, when people are driven back to the Word in times of great stress and insecurity, it is not understanding they seek but comfort. This has its place, but the comfort and strength we need comes not from soothing words but from solid wisdom, foundational teaching, the great truths of the Bible. Perhaps we need to go right back to the most basic principle, this is a Bible, and build from there.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...