Skip to main content

Searching for Answers, Discovering Insights

 


I received a call from someone asking for help in developing a good apologetic in witnessing to Jehovah’s Witnesses. His enthusiasm was encouraging in a world where fear and apprehension, complexity and a sense of helplessness are the usual faire. It made me reflect on the process that might bring someone to this place of finally wanting to do something constructive when they answer the door.

Christians who have never been in a cult will often imagine, whatever else might be said, it is an exotic experience, touched with a frisson of danger and romance. This really is incorrect, but people are sometimes drawn because of this mistaken notion. Neither the cult nor the ministry are romantic, certainly the ministry is not especially popular among churches and church leaders; too ‘confrontational.’

What I find is often the case, however, is an encounter with Mormons, or Jehovah’s Witnesses, or some other group, drives someone back to their Bible. There they search for answers to questions they have not previously thought about. In their searching they discover the thrill of wrestling with the great truths of Scripture.

It isn’t so much that they found answers as they found insights. Now, not only do they have an answer for the next Jehovah’s Witness at their door, they have a depth of understanding that feeds their faith and helps them mature in Christ. It is a depth of insight and understanding that is, in my experience, woefully absent from the lives of many Christians today.

‘Positive, adj.: ‘Mistaken at the top of one’s voice.’ Ambrose Bierce

If you don’t know how to speak to people about your faith it is almost certainly because your Bible is gathering dust on your shelf. That, or perhaps you only bring it off the shelf to affirm yourself with the pleasant verses, to find proof texts that reinforce your narrow theological choices, not to be taught, reproved, corrected, and trained in righteousness. (2 Tim.3:16)

If I had a penny for every time I have come across Christians still complacently using arguments they learned thirty and forty years ago, I would be in a better financial state today. Arguments they have leaned on, never having troubled themselves to learn more, learn better. The word of God is eternal and unchanging, our understanding of it isn’t. In our understanding and application we are meant to grow.

These arguments have sometimes proved with time to be mistaken, but they have carried around this killer text for all that time, whipping it out at every opportunity, positive it’s right. It was Ambrose Bierce who defined ‘positive’ as, ‘Mistaken at the top of one’s voice.’

Cynical, I know, but I remember this when someone shares a thought I haven’t come across before. I don’t repeat my argument, thinking volume will compensate for content, I go back to my Bible and search out the truth there. If I was wrong I adjust my thinking. If I was right all along I cannot take credit but glorify God that I was able to send someone else back to their Bible and find it for themselves.

Those who decry the confrontational aspects of ministry will find themselves on the wrong side of the argument. To be steeped in the word of God is to be immersed in apologetics.

It is to stand with Jesus as he challenges the hypocrisy of the Pharisees, calling them ‘whitewashed tombs.’ (Mt.23:27)

It is to stand with Paul as he challenges the claims of the Judaisers in his letters, even challenging Peter at one point to his face for choosing tradition over truth. (Gal.2:11-14)

It is to stand with John as he refutes the false teachings of Gnosticism, calling Christians back to the three basics of Christian life: true doctrine, obedient living, and fervent devotion. (1 John)

It is to stand with Jude as he warns of the false teachings of those who have surreptitiously entered the church and are perverting the faith. Jude’s is a call to aggressively defend the truth, to ‘contend for the faith.’ (Jude 3) The word here translated ‘contend’ is epagōnizomai meaning to struggle, to fight. The KJV translates ‘earnestly contend.’ Are we earnest in our defence of truth?

The lesson is, as we contend for the truth we find ourselves coming to better know the truth every day. With that knowledge comes better understanding, and with that understanding comes insight, enlightenment that leads, in turn, to application and growth. All because we followed the counsel of Paul to Timothy, Keep a close watch on yourself and on the teaching. Persist in this, for by doing so you will save both yourself and your hearers.’ (1 Tim.4:16)

Some people store their money in a Bible because they know that it’s never likely to be opened

The Bible is so precious and reliable that a young Luther, answering his accusers, was confident to stand on its promises, saying, ‘Unless I am convinced by the testimony of the Holy Scriptures or by evident reason...I cannot and will not recant, because acting against one’s conscience is neither safe nor sound. God help me.’

The Bible is so dangerous a book that emperors, kings, and prelates have killed men to keep it out of circulation, and that is true today. So precious and vital that men have died under torture and at the stake in their pursuit of its being put in the hands of ordinary people in their common tongue. They did not make such sacrifices so we could neglect the fruit of their labours.

The Bible is filled with adventures, and its own story is an adventure.

It is filled with wisdom, of which we are surely in short supply today.

It is filled with truth, something people need as a foundation for their lives.

It is filled with life, ‘living and active’ able to read men’s hearts, renew minds, and instil hope with its promises.

It has been said, some people store their money in a Bible because they know that it’s never likely to be opened. There is treasure far greater than earthly wealth in our Bibles, if only we would go to the trouble to look.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

The Times of the Gentiles - by Dawn Partington

Jehovah's Witnesses teach that “the times of the gentiles” is a time period of 2,520 years, beginning in 607BC and ending in AD1914. According to their doctrine, Jesus was enthroned as King in AD1914 when the “gentile times” ended. 1. Only one verse in scripture mentions “the times of the gentiles”: 'They will fall by the sword and will be taken as prisoners to all the nations. Jerusalem will be trampled on by the Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled.'  Luke 21:24 NIV. The Jehovah's Witness organisation has linked this one verse with other prophetic passages to calculate the supposed length of these “gentile times”, notably a time period which began hundreds of years before the incarnation and ended over 1900 years after it. 2. Simple examination of the text of Luke 21 reveals what Jesus was referring to when he used the phrase “the times of the gentiles”. Let's look at the passage together and distil this into four points which you may...

Resurrection or Cloning?

  In the film “The Sixth Day”, based in the near future where cloning of pets is allowed but not of humans, the main character, Adam, played by Arnold Schwarzenegger, wakes up in a taxi, not knowing how he got there.   He travels home only to see another man inside with his family; this man looks exactly like him.   Before being able to confront the imposter, Adam is attacked by unknown assailants and has to run.   This being an Arnie movie there are lots of shoot outs and the body count is high as Adam attempts to find out what is going on. It turns out that he has been cloned and the cloning company is trying to clear up the loose ends.   Spoiler alert; it turns out he is the clone and the other Adam is the original.   The story highlights some problems with the Watchtower’s ideas about ‘resurrection’.   They teach that, at death, who we are ceases to exist; there is no soul or spirit that survives death, nothing of our essence continues on. ...