Skip to main content

Jumpers for Goalposts (3)

 




G.K. Chesterton was once asked if we should take the Bible literally, this was his response: ‘The Bible says that Herod is a fox – that does not mean he has a bushy tail and pointy ears. It also says that Jesus is the door – that does not mean that he is wooden, flat and swinging on hinges.’

It is not possible within the scope of this article to cover the subject of hermeneutics in any great depth, but I will suggest a good book below in case you want to study this subject further.

Hermeneutics is the art of biblical interpretation. As seen from my previous articles, this is matter of great importance. Many handle the Word of God in a slapdash and frivolous fashion and, in doing so, cause great damage to the body of Christ. This is sad because there are tools available to us that would greatly help our understanding of Scripture. Let us briefly consider some of them.

What musical genre are national anthems? Country.

The Bible is a book like no other. There are sixty-six books collated into one, with varying types of literary genre. Therein can be found law, narrative, wisdom, poetry, gospel, parable, epistle, and apocalyptic. Each of these kinds of literature have specific features that must be considered to properly understand what the text is saying. To not take into account the particular genre of writing will almost certainly lead to a misunderstanding of the text.

The Meaning of the Text

As a former Secondary School teacher, it was my job to enforce the rules. At the beginning of a lesson I may have had a rule written on the board. It may have said something like: ‘No talking when the teacher is talking.’ It was a clear and obvious instruction, but it did not stop students challenging it. ‘But Sir, what does that even mean’? To which I would reply: ‘It means what it says. Now shut up and get on with your work.’

A basic premise of biblical interpretation is that, unless there are clear and obvious reasons not to, we should take the text at face value. If the text can be understood literally, then there is no reason why it should not be understood literally. The text means whatever the author intended, not what I think it means, and to understand what the author meant we need to consider the text’s historical and grammatical context.

Context – Context - Context


For I know the plans I have for you…’ Jeremiah 29:11 is what I call a fridge magnet verse. This verse is constantly ripped out of its context and applied to individual believers, with the promise that God wants you to prosper. The problem with this is that verse is not about you! In its context this verse is a promise to the exiles in Babylon, with a promise that they will one day they will be restored to their land. God has a plan to prosper them. Can God speak to an individual through this text – yes! But can it be used to say that God guarantees a life of prosperity to every individual believer – no!

The interpreter should, therefore, endeavour to take himself from the present, and to transport himself into the historical position of his author, look through his eyes, note his surroundings, feel with his heart, and catch his emotion. Herein we note the import of the term grammatico-historical interpretation.[1]

 

"A text without a context is a pretext”

In not considering the context, many cults use texts as a pretext for false teaching. Sadly, it is not only cults that are guilty of this, many within the Christian church can also fall into this trap.

Therefore, considering the context is vital to proper biblical interpretation. By context we mean, the immediate verses around the text, the paragraph, the chapter, the book, the author and how it then fits into the entirety of Scripture. 


The Bible as interpreter

There is no doubt that there are some verses in the Bible that are difficult to understand. What are we to do with those? A hermeneutical principle can be used here. Where we find a challenging verse, we should seek to understand it by holding it up against clearer biblical passages which are dealing with the same issue.  An example of this could be those tricky verses found in Hebrews 6:4-6. Can a believer lose his/her salvation? What does the Bible say elsewhere on this topic?

John 10:28,29 I give them eternal life, and they will never perish, and no one will snatch them out of my hand. My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than all, and no one is able to snatch them out of the Father's hand.

1 John 5:13 These things I have written to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, so that you may know that you have eternal life.

John 5:24 Truly, truly, I say to you, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life. He does not come into judgment, but has passed from death to life.

Romans 8:38-39  For I am sure that neither death nor life, nor angels nor rulers, nor things present nor things to come, nor powers, nor height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord.

As the weight of Scripture on this topic indicates that a true believer cannot lose his salvation, this would bring to bear on how one would interpret and understand Hebrews 6.

Bridge Building

We need to a build a bridge which takes us from interpretation to application. Though we should understand the historical and grammatical context, so we might comprehend the author’s original intent, we need to also recognise that the Bible is not just a history book. The Bible is theopneustos – God breathed and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness.[2] The Word of God is alive and speaks to us and so we are right to ask how does the text apply to us today.

As we have discovered Jeremiah 29:11 is not about us, but that does not mean that there aren’t eternal principles that we can take from it and apply to ourselves. We see in Scripture that God is making all things new and, in the future, He will restore us to a promised land where ‘He will wipe away every tear from their eyes, and death shall be no more, neither shall there be mourning, nor crying, nor pain anymore, for the former things have passed away.’[3]  Through Jesus, God has plans to prosper us, to give us a future and a hope.  

Wait a minute – there’s more

I do hope that you have found this brief series helpful and thought-provoking. I do realise that it has not gone far enough and even left some questions unanswered. Therefore, I suggest the following book as a helpful aid for further study on this important topic.

How to Read the Bible for All Its Worth: Fourth Edition: Gordon D. Fee & Douglas Stuart



[1] Milton S. Terry, Biblical Hermeneutics (NY: Philips and Hunt, 1883), p.231.

[2] 2 Timothy 3:16-17

[3] Revelation 21:4


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent

The Mormon God’s Dysfunctional Family

You know those moments when you look at something you’ve looked at a thousand times before and suddenly see something new? I was looking at a blog I found via the Google Blog Alerts service and it told the familiar story of the Mormon “ Plan of Salvation”; you can read it here. There really was nothing surprising until I started thinking about what people might think if a family they knew conducted themselves the way the Mormon “family of God” do in this story. People from abusive backgrounds have problems enough with the idea of God as a Father but this story would put anyone off the idea forever! As I recount this story think about what the typical dad would do as his kids are growing up and compare it with this “exalted man.” According to Mormonism “ God created our spirits” and we lived with him in a pre-mortal existence (Mormons say “pre-existence” but it is not possible to pre-exist, i.e. to exist before you exist. The noun “existence” has to be have the prefix “pre” othe