Skip to main content

Jumpers for Goalposts

 



Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a worker who has no need to be ashamed, rightly handling the word of truth.   

2 Timothy 2:15

When I was young, I used to love nothing more than playing football with my friends. Near to where I lived was a large grass area and when we arrived, we would take our jumpers off and lay them on the ground to use as goalposts. The problem with those ‘jumper’ goalposts was that they were broad and easily relocated. The goalkeeper could move them when we weren’t looking to make the goal smaller, and a sneaky opposition player could use his foot to move the posts to make the goals bigger. These were not the only problems.

I remember heated discussions regarding whether the ball had crossed the line (pretty difficult to be sure when there was no actual line to cross); or whether the ball had gone in or over the extra-large goalpost – such fun!  

As fondly as all this lives in the memory, and as entertaining as it was at the time, on reflection I realise that what we were playing was a faulty version of football. To play the game properly we needed fixed goalposts of the correct size and a line of the correct length and width. Using the right equipment for the job would have ensured that the game we were playing was indeed genuine football. Where am I going with all this, I hear you ask? Bear with…

Hermen Who?

Sometimes you will hear preachers and teachers use words that you do not understand, but you think everyone else does, so you just smile and nod your head. One such word may be hermeneutics. You may have heard your pastor say something along the lines of ‘To understand our Bibles correctly we need to apply the correct principles of hermeneutics’. Your pastor is right – but what on earth is he talking about? He is saying that using the right equipment for the job would ensure the faith we are living is indeed genuine Christianity.

You see to rightly understand the message of the Bible, correct principles of interpretation need to be used. These principles of interpretation are called hermeneutics. Without ‘fixed goalposts’ (principles), without the ‘correct lines’ being drawn, we are liable to preach and teach a faulty version of the biblical message. Without hermeneutics, we may find ourselves preaching and teaching a faulty version of Christianity. It would be the equivalent of having jumpers for goalposts.


Basic Instructions Before Leaving Earth

The Bible is God’s Word. Paul writing to Timothy said that all Scripture is theopneustos – that is ‘God breathed’ and it is profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work. (2 Timothy 3:16-17). In saying this, Paul must have believed that Scripture could be read, understood, and applied to the lives of believers. If true, then this begs a question, one that I have heard many times. If the Bible can be read, understood, and applied, then why are there so many different beliefs amongst Christians?

I remember once opening the door to a Jehovah’s Witness who asked me what my view was on same sex marriage. I told him that I did not agree with it as marriage, according to the Bible, is between one man and one woman. He smiled and said he agreed, but then challenged me with a further question. If you and I agree that same sex marriage is biblically prohibited, why have I just spoken to another churchgoer who said that she has no problem with two men, or two women being married? That’s a fair question. He then rather smugly proceeded to tell me that every one of Jehovah’s Witnesses would agree, not only on this moral issue, but on all points of doctrine.

There are reasons why all Jehovah’s Witnesses believe alike, and it is not because they use the correct principles of biblical interpretation (a future article on this would be helpful). The bigger question this post seeks to address is why do Christians interpret things differently?

Has God given us a book that it is impossible to agree upon or is there a problem with how people read it, study it, and interpret it? I believe the answer lies in the latter. Now before we proceed, let us point out something that the Jehovah’s Witness on the doorstep would not understand. It is okay for Christians to hold different views, if the differences relate to secondary, non-salvific issues. All those who would have Jesus as their Lord and Saviour, should agree on the primary issues (eg Monotheism; Trinity; Deity of Christ; Death and Physical Resurrection of Christ, Salvation by Grace etc.); but there can be diverse opinions on issues of less import. But shouldn’t Christians agree on all matters relating to the faith?

I would like to offer five reasons why Christians may have different interpretations of Scripture:

1)  The Person interpreting Scripture is not a Christian.

2)   The Person interpreting Scripture seeks to impose pre-existing presuppositional beliefs.

3)  The Person interpreting Scripture has not been trained in how to read and understand the Bible.

4)  The Person interpreting Scripture has not been trained in Biblical hermeneutics.

5)  The Person interpreting Scripture follows their denominational tradition.

You may be able to think of other reasons, but I am convinced that with the use of some basic principles of interpretation (hermeneutics), Christians would find themselves more closely aligned to each other in rightly handling the word of truth.

My next article will unpack the five reasons listed above and a further article will consider some of the hermeneutical tools available to help us understand the Bible. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent

The Mormon God’s Dysfunctional Family

You know those moments when you look at something you’ve looked at a thousand times before and suddenly see something new? I was looking at a blog I found via the Google Blog Alerts service and it told the familiar story of the Mormon “ Plan of Salvation”; you can read it here. There really was nothing surprising until I started thinking about what people might think if a family they knew conducted themselves the way the Mormon “family of God” do in this story. People from abusive backgrounds have problems enough with the idea of God as a Father but this story would put anyone off the idea forever! As I recount this story think about what the typical dad would do as his kids are growing up and compare it with this “exalted man.” According to Mormonism “ God created our spirits” and we lived with him in a pre-mortal existence (Mormons say “pre-existence” but it is not possible to pre-exist, i.e. to exist before you exist. The noun “existence” has to be have the prefix “pre” othe