Killing the Passion

Killing the Passion - Photini

If you want to know what this series is about go to my first post here.

The more I look at Brian Simmons the greater my concern. Follow him and down the rabbit hole you go to a world so unfamiliar to the keenest Bible student you simply must take his word for it, and that is troubling.

In a 7 minute video he tells the story of the woman at the well. The familiar story is related, along with some Brian Simmons flourishes, then he says, ‘The Lord, when I was translating John 4, said, ‘Well, she has a name. Would you like to know her name? Her name is Photini.’

There is already a question mark over his claim to be a Bible ‘translator,’ his work sounding more like an act of channelling than translating, as he ‘shares the heart of God.’ Having related this revelation from God about the woman’s name, he goes on to relate what happened next to Photini. You might be forgiven for thinking he is continuing to relate what God told him. After all, he begins by saying God told him her name. However, he tells us you can check what he is saying on Wikipedia and assures us what historians affirm.

The story of Photini, as he relates it, comes from a long-standing Eastern Christian tradition and can, indeed, be checked out on Wikipedia. How much credence we are to give it is another question, but we can be sure that all we know from the Bible is in John 4. The problem I have with this is how God apparently told him her name, and he looked it up on Wikipedia, from which he, seemingly, gets the rest of her story. Did God say, ‘If you don’t believe me, look it up on Wikipedia?’ I must be frank, my first instinct is to reach for my Bible, but that’s me. Of course, if he started with Wikipedia and then...let’s not go there.

He mentions ‘Sod,’ and ‘the land of Sod,’ several times in this story and this is apparently key to his flights of fancy. It bears investigation and I will come to that in another post, but the point here is Brian Simmons is not translating the Bible, he is rewriting it, using any and every resource that comes to hand and calling it ‘revelation.’

Today's text for comparison is Romans 12:2

‘Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that by testing you may discern what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect.’ ESV (35 words)

'Do not conform to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God’s will is—his good, pleasing and perfect will.' NIV (37 words)

‘Stop imitating the ideals and opinions of the culture around you, but be inwardly transformed by the Holy Spirit through a total reformation of how you think. This will empower you to discern God’s will as you live a beautiful life, satisfying and perfect in his eyes.’ TPT (47 words)

Twelve more words than the more literal ESV, Ten more than the dynamic equivalence NIV. I do wonder, at the rate he adds words to Scripture, how heavy his finished Bible is going to be, and will I be able to carry a printed edition to church?

Of course, this is not translation so much as exposition. This is Brian Simmons ‘preaching’ the passage in the passage. Now we can test what Brian Simmons thinks against what we know the Bible tells us. In his verbose way he does bring across the meaning quite well, but notice the focus of his exposition. Resisting the pattern of the world, seeking a renewed mind, is to the end we should know and live out God’s will.

What, in legitimate translations, is the ability to test and know God’s will, for Brian it is ‘power,’ to ‘live a beautiful life.’ The focus has changed, subtly, but clearly enough, from the perfect will of God to the beautiful life of the believer. These things are not, of course, mutually exclusive, You may believe they relate one to another, but they don’t stand side-by-side in the text. Discerning and following the perfect will of God may, or may not, lead to a beautiful life, but that is exposition, not translation.

In the previous verse Paul writes, ‘I appeal to you therefore, brothers, by the mercies of God, to present your bodies as living sacrifices, holy and acceptable to God, which is your spiritual worship.’ ESV

We seek to discern God’s will so we can offer our lives as living sacrifices, to the one who made us and remade us, offering up spiritual worship. We discern and offer up what is ‘holy and acceptable to God.’ This may be beautiful but the focus is God and not me.

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...

Bridge of Reason

Search This Blog