Skip to main content

Killing the Passion - People of Sod


If you want to know what this series is about see my first post here.
We looked last time at Brian Simmons’ version of the story of Photini, the woman at the well. He drew some pretty peculiar teaching from the text in John 4 and you might be forgiven for wondering where it came from. It came from ‘Sod.’
No more than 17 seconds into his talk he says, ‘someone’s going to get into Sod,’ later exclaiming, ‘Come on Sodites,’ as he goes on with his story. ‘Jesus is speaking out of the Sod realm,’ he tells us. We need to see this dialogue, ‘in the Sod lens,’ he insists..
He is drawing on a Hebrew model of Exegesis with the acronym PaRDeS, which postulates four levels of understanding in Hebrew thought. According to Wikipedia, the levels in this 3,000-year-old tradition are:
Peshat – the surface, straight, or literal meaning.
Remez – ‘hints’ or the deep (allegorical: hidden or symbolic) meaning beyond the literal sense.
Derash – from the Hebrew darash: ‘inquire’ (‘seek’) – the comparative (midrashic) meaning.
Sod – (pronounced with a long O as in ‘lore’) meaning ‘secret’ (‘mystery’) or the esoteric/mystical, as given through inspiration or revelation.
Given the choice between ‘it means what it says’; ‘there is more to this if you get the hint’; ‘there is more to this but you have to apply yourself and study’; and ‘there is something else altogether going on here and only revelation will uncover the meaning,’ Brian Simmons chooses Sod. Of course he does.
There is much more to the legitimate PaRDeS model but it is enough for Brian Simmons that the fourth category is there. After all, it’s not as if he is qualified, or indeed inclined to include the other three in his teaching model. Sod gives him all the space he needs to share his peculiar take on a story best understood through a little study and background knowledge.

Kabbalah

What is troubling is the entirely esoteric nature of what he brings. The fourth level of teaching, the mystical/hidden meaning, derives from Jewish mysticism-Kabbalah-metaphysics. You can, in his talk, hear gasps of awe and wonder as people respond to teaching they haven’t heard before (novelty is always true, right?). They grasp at ‘truths’ they find ‘revelatory’ without being good Bereans and asking questions (Acts 17:10-15) After all, it’s not as if any plain or studied meaning can be derived from the Bible any more, not now we are in Sod.
This is where all the extra words in his ‘translation’ of Scripture come from – the land of Sod. No matter that qualified theologians express deep concerns about The Passion Translation - they no longer qualify to judge. This comes direct from the esoteric realm of Sod. Analysing God’s word ruins it, so the best thing to do is ‘get out of your mind.’ But, surely, we are to be transformed by the renewing of our minds, not by banishing thought? (Romans 12:2)
The text for comparison this time is Philippians 3:12-13:
 ‘Not that I have already obtained all this, or have already arrived at my goal, but I press on to take hold of that for which Christ Jesus took hold of me. Brothers and sisters, I do not consider myself yet to have taken hold of it. But one thing I do: forgetting what is behind and straining towards what is ahead,…’ NIV (62 words)
Not that I have already obtained this or am already perfect, but I press on to make it my own, because Christ Jesus has made me his own. Brothers, I do not consider that I have made it my own. But one thing I do: forgetting what lies behind and straining forward to what lies ahead,..’ ESV (56 words)
I admit that I haven’t yet acquired the absolute fullness that I’m pursuing, but I run with passion into his abundance so that I may reach the purpose that Jesus Christ has called me to fulfill and wants me to discover. I don’t depend on my own strength to accomplish this; however I do have one compelling focus: I forget all of the past as I fasten my heart to the future instead.’ TPT (73 words)
I press on to take hold of that for which Christ Jesus took hold of me,’ (16 words) becomes,
I run with passion into his abundance so that I may reach the purpose that Jesus Christ has called me to fulfill and wants me to discover.’ (27 words)
The thing for which Paul is striving in this passage is the full and glorious resurrection of the dead. He wishes to become like Jesus in his death and suffering so that he may attain resurrection life. The previous verses tell us as much. All Paul has sacrificed as worthless he gives up to ‘gain Christ, and be found in him, not having a righteousness of my own that comes from the law, but that which comes through faith in Christ, the righteousness of God that depends on faith – that I may know him and the power of his resurrection…’ (vv8-10)
Brian Simmons seeks abundance, for Christians Christ is enough.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...