Skip to main content

Is Preaching a Requirement for Salvation?

 


 Today I listened to a JW video with GB member David Splane talking about the book of James and chapter 2 v 17 in particular. The video is a textbook monologue by the Governing Body, telling people what they “know” (a form of ‘gaslighting’), contradicting what the Watchtower actually teaches, and criticising “Evangelicals”. He mimicked people JWs meet who say that JWs believe they will earn their salvation by going door-to-door and then tells us that “you know that’s not true” (Min 2:15) Do we know that? Let’s check the evidence (Emphasise are mine);

“The fourth requirement [to reside in paradise] is connected with loyalty. God requires that prospective subjects of the Kingdom support his government by loyally advocating his kingdom rule to others…will you meet this requirement by telling others about God’s kingdom?” Watchtower 15 Feb 1983 p12-13

“Twelve Reasons for Preaching…7. It is a requirement for our own salvationOur Kingdom ministry No 6 June 2012.

“But in what special way does God expect loyal support to be given? ...like Jesus Christ and his early followers, they must be loyal spokesmen or proclaimers of God’s kingdom” Book You Can Live Forever in Paradise on Earth p 133

Those are just a few of the  articles regarding the requirement to preach, there are many more that talk either of the need to merit one’s salvation, proclaim it a reward not a gift, and the need to be part of the organisation to have any chance of surviving Armageddon or making it into paradise.

He accuses “Evangelicals” (a very large group of Christians worldwide!) of saying that works are not important. He asks if Jesus is interested in our works or does He agree with the “Evangelicals” that all we need to do is believe. Those Evangelicals I know agree that works are very important, but just that doing them doesn’t get us salvation and are simply an automatic result of our faith. ‘Faith without works is dead’, yes, but it is the living faith (proven by works it produces) that saves us.

The mistake by Splane is to fail to understand the difference between the requirements for salvation and the results of salvation. Jesus would agree that belief is all you need (Acts 16 v 31 et al) but would also expect there to be works resulting from that belief, if it were true. We work because we are saved not in order to be saved.

Splane goes on to say a witness “swears to tell the truth”, has he here, I do not believe so. The Watchtower goes to great lengths to tell its members that preaching is a requirement for salvation. With all the evidence to the contrary of what Splane is saying, I would be surprised if the average JW doesn’t feel the need to preach door-to-door, or on the carts, in order to gain their salvation.

What the Governing Body says and what it teaches are often at odds with each other, maybe because the videos are easy to watch by the average non-JW, whereas publications are more JW orientated.  It’s a similar juxtaposition between Awake and Watchtower articles; the former being normalised ‘bait’ for the unwary and the latter for the member.

Yes, Jesus commands us to “make disciples of all nations” (Matt 28 v 19) but because we love Him (John 14 v 15), not so as to be saved from our sins. This love should spur us on to be happy to share our faith where we can, secure in the knowledge that we have entered God’s kingdom and are safe in His love.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

The Mormon God’s Dysfunctional Family

You know those moments when you look at something you’ve looked at a thousand times before and suddenly see something new? I was looking at a blog I found via the Google Blog Alerts service and it told the familiar story of the Mormon “ Plan of Salvation”; you can read it here. There really was nothing surprising until I started thinking about what people might think if a family they knew conducted themselves the way the Mormon “family of God” do in this story. People from abusive backgrounds have problems enough with the idea of God as a Father but this story would put anyone off the idea forever! As I recount this story think about what the typical dad would do as his kids are growing up and compare it with this “exalted man.” According to Mormonism “ God created our spirits” and we lived with him in a pre-mortal existence (Mormons say “pre-existence” but it is not possible to pre-exist, i.e. to exist before you exist. The noun “existence” has to be have the prefix “pre” othe...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...