Skip to main content

Exit Strategy

 


Perhaps a core aim of Reachout Trust is to help those caught up in the cults to successfully exit the group and come to a faith in the Lord Jesus as their saviour. But what is the best way to do that, is there a silver bullet or a holy hand grenade that instantly brings the cult member into the truth?

I have come to use AI more in my research and found it very useful and insightful in its responses. It does always warn that it can make mistakes so one has to be careful in trusting it too blindly. I asked it what the most effective strategy would be to bring someone out of the Watchtower Society and here is its answer.

The Core Problem: Why Direct Approaches Fail

The instinct is to confront — to present the failed prophecies, the blood transfusion deaths, the NWT translation issues. This almost always backfires. The Watchtower has pre-inoculated members against exactly this: outside criticism is framed as Satanic attack, which *confirms* the member's worldview rather than challenging it. Cognitive dissonance, rather than producing doubt, often produces deeper entrenchment (Festinger's backfire effect).

What the Evidence Supports

1. Relationship Before Information

The single most consistent finding across exit counselling literature is that the relationship with the helper matters more than the arguments. If a JW feels they will lose your love or respect by doubting, the emotional cost of doubt is too high. Your goal is to become someone safe to think out loud with — not an adversary.

- Maintain genuine warmth regardless of their beliefs

- Never mock the organization, Rutherford, Russell, or their theology

- Make it clear your relationship is unconditional

2. The Strategic Use of Questions (Socratic Method)

Rather than presenting counter-evidence, ask questions they cannot answer from within the system:

- "How would you know if the Governing Body was wrong about something?"*

- "What would need to be true for you to reconsider?"

- "Has the Society ever changed a teaching they previously said was 'the truth'?"* (This opens the door to discussing 1914/1925/1975 prophetic failures on their terms)

- "Do you think Jehovah would want you to look at all available evidence?"*

These work because they use JW values (truth-seeking, loyalty to Jehovah over men) as leverage. The goal is to create internal dissonance rather than external pressure.

3. Target the Epistemology [knowledge system], Not the Doctrine

The deeper intervention isn't about any specific teaching — it's about how they know what they know. Once someone begins to question whether the Governing Body is a reliable source of truth, doctrinal dominoes fall naturally. Key openings:

- The UN NGO affiliation (1991–2001) — well-documented and hard to explain away

- The CSA cases and the two-witness rule — provokes genuine moral conflict

- Historical failed prophecies (1914 as Armageddon, 1925 resurrection of Abraham, 1975)

- The evolution of the "faithful and discreet slave" doctrine — was it the entire anointed class or just the GB?

4. The BITE Model as a Personal Frame

Steven Hassan's BITE model (Behavior, Information, Thought, Emotional control) can be useful not as something you present to them, but as something you use to gently surface anomalies:

- "Do you feel free to read critical material about the Society?"*

- "What happens to people who raise concerns at meetings?"*

- "Do you ever feel guilty for having doubts?"*

These help them notice the control mechanisms from the inside.

5. Addressing the Social Trap

For most JWs, the real barrier isn't theological — it's social. Leaving means losing everyone: family, friends, community, identity, and in many cases housing or employment. Any effective strategy must acknowledge this openly and practically:

- Help them identify or build outside social connections *before* any formal exit

- Connect them (if possible) with ex-JW communities (r/exjw, the BITE Model community, JW Support groups)

- Make yourself a concrete part of the social alternative

- Avoid ultimatums ("it's us or them") — this just accelerates shunning dynamics

6. Timing and Emotional State

People are most open to doubt during crisis points within the organization:

- A disfellowshipping they experienced as unjust

- A death where blood doctrine was a factor

- Being "passed over" for privileges

- A failed prophecy they took seriously

- Observing elder misconduct

These windows are precious. Gentle curiosity during these moments is far more powerful than years of argument.

7. Professional Resources

- Steven Hassan's SIA method (Strategic Interactive Approach) — relationship-based, non-coercive

- BITE Model resources (bitemodel.com)

- ICSA (International Cultic Studies Association) — offers counselor referrals

- JW Support / jwsupport.com** — specifically for JW-affected families

What to Absolutely Avoid

- Confrontational debating — they are trained for this and it reinforces the "persecution" narrative

- Forcing a crisis — ultimatums usually result in the person choosing the organization

- Ridicule — of the organization, founders, or their beliefs

- Cutting off contact — the moment you become "worldly" or "dangerous," you lose all influence

- Rushing — exit from high-control groups typically takes years, not weeks

Realistic Expectations

The research on exit from high-control groups (Lalich, Lifton, Singer, Hassan) consistently shows that most people who leave do so gradually, through an accumulation of doubts over time, often triggered by personal experience rather than outside argument. Your role is usually to be a safe harbour for a process that is already beginning internally — not to initiate it from the outside by force.

The most honest summary: plant seeds, tend the relationship, and wait. It's slow work, but it's the only kind that actually holds.

I found this quite powerful and lines up with my own experience of the testimonies of former JWs. The answer is from a purely psychological point of view, which does have its merits, but omits the spiritual aspect. As Christians, we must remember

… our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms. 

Ephesians 6 v 12

But also

You, dear children, are from God and have overcome them, because the one who is in you is greater than the one who is in the world. 

1 John 4 v 4 

The most powerful tool we have, and the one the AI missed, is prayer, invoking the Holy Spirit to work in the lives of these people and to open their eyes to the truth. Not only the truth of their enslavement to the organisation but also, and even more importantly, to the truth of the gospel that saves.

Saying a few words to a member on a cart or at the door may not bring them out of the cult but it’s a start and it may be the seed that eventually germinates and we should never give up in speaking the gospel wherever we can.

Footnote: If you're interested in understanding more about how AI is affecting the cult world this is a subject of a seminar at the Reachout26 conference in October 2026. See the website for more details

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Cheers!

  In their latest update #4, the Jehovah’s Witnesses' Governing Body has announced that toasting and ‘ clinking glasses’  is now allowed at the individual Jehovah’s Witness’s ‘ bible trained conscience’ .  This, Governing Body member Stephen Lett tells us, is due to ‘ prayerful consideration’  by the Governing Body.  This doesn’t sound unreasonable; who could possibly object to toasting, it’s such an innocuous custom?  The answer to that is the Governing Body itself, until now. Ever since 1952, and possibly earlier, the Watchtower has roundly condemned this practice due to its ‘ pagan roots’  in ‘ false religion’ .  The 15 May 1952 Watchtower (page 319), has this to say on the matter Jehovah God and Christ Jesus are not honored by having pagan customs of toasting switched to them, or to human s In 1968, in an answer to  Questions from Readers,  the 1 Jan Watchtower states If a Christian is going to make a request f...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...