Skip to main content

The Resurrection - God's Greatest Scam?

 


Christians around the world are celebrating what is, perhaps, the greatest event in human history – the resurrection of Jesus Christ. For millennia we have believed that Christ was raised bodily, that the body He inhabited while living was raised to perfection. In 1 Corinthians 15 v 35-54 we find details of what His (and our) new body looked like, it is not the same, and yet it is.

Sown perishable it is raised imperishable, it dies physical, it is raised spiritual. Jesus’ body clearly had unearthly powers as we can see from it popping in and out of locked rooms at will (John 20 v 19) and vanishing before people’s eyes (Luke 24 v 31). But the Watchtower would have us believe this was all a big con. They claim that Jesus was not raised bodily but as a spirit, that Jehovah somehow dissolved His physical body into its constituent atoms to hide it away.

They claim that Jesus only appeared to be in physical form in order to convince His disciples that He had indeed been raised. They claim that all the times He appeared to them He simply took on a physical body, often a different one, which is why the disciples didn’t recognise Him (Luke 24 v 16, John 20 v 14-15). 

What evidence do they put forward for this notion? They point to 1 Corinthians 15 v 44 where it talks of Jesus’ “spiritual body”, and 1 Peter 3 v 18 where it says Jesus was made alive “in the Spirit”. They show that spirit creatures can take on physical bodies, like the angels in Genesis 19 v 1-3, and that spirits are not confined by physical laws. They even claim that Jesus took on a physical body with wound marks to convince Thomas that it was really Him.

It appears that Jesus went to considerable lengths to trick the disciples into believing He had risen bodily. Do we really think Jesus, the perfect Son of God, would trick His disciples into believing something that wasn’t true? Is this God’s greatest scam?

It is testament to the Watchtower’s psychological control over its members that they believe this scam and don’t make the effort to consider the full evidence. The fact that Jesus went to such lengths to show His physical nature should convince them of its truth.

Jesus ate and drank numerous times after His resurrection (Luke 24 v 43, John 21 v 12-13, Acts 10 v 41) which is not something spirits need to do.  He specifically asked His disciples to touch Him and see because “a spirit does not have flesh and bones” (Luke 24 v 39).

Even before He died in John 2 v 19 Jesus spoke of how He was to be raised where it, very specifically, tells us Jesus was talking of His body that He was to raise, not His spirit. It even records that the disciples remembered this statement after Jesus was resurrected.

Jesus’ body was raised “spiritual” not as a spirit.  I like to think I am ‘spiritual,’ as all Christians should be, but I am clearly not a spirit without a body (I know that because this one aches a lot when I exercise!) He was raised “in the spirit” not as a spirit, there’s a big difference.

The two disciples who met Jesus on the road to Emmaus were “kept” from recognising Jesus not that He didn’t look like Jesus. It is understandable that Mary didn’t recognise Jesus at first, she was distraught, weeping, and not expecting to see Him, as well as it being dark (John 20 v 1). After Jesus called her name, she turned again and immediately recognised Him. If He had been in a different body that would not have happened.

One other piece of evidence, often overlooked, is the state of the burial clothes in the tomb. In John 20 v 7 we are told that the cloth that was around Jesus’ head was not lying with the other clothes but lying by itself. If the body had simply been dematerialised, like the Watchtower claims, then the head cloth would have been right above the other clothes.

I believe it is clear from an unbiased reading of the evidence in scripture that we are to understand that Jesus was raised bodily, not simply as a spirit.  Agreed, what was raised was different to what was sown, yet it was raised. To believe otherwise would require us to accept that Jesus and the Father went to great lengths to scam the disciples and the hundreds of others who saw Him (1 Corinthians 15 v 6). No, this was no scam, this was real, the greatest event in human history.

Jesus was raised imperishable, as we will be. He was raised to prove that we too can be raised back to life and be with Him forever. Jesus doesn’t need to trick us, that’s not how He works, God cannot lie (Numbers 23 v 19, Titus 1 v2) nor can He deceive. If we believe He lied about this then what else did He lie about, can we trust anything else He told us or did?

He can be trusted, He is risen, praise the Lord.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Cheers!

  In their latest update #4, the Jehovah’s Witnesses' Governing Body has announced that toasting and ‘ clinking glasses’  is now allowed at the individual Jehovah’s Witness’s ‘ bible trained conscience’ .  This, Governing Body member Stephen Lett tells us, is due to ‘ prayerful consideration’  by the Governing Body.  This doesn’t sound unreasonable; who could possibly object to toasting, it’s such an innocuous custom?  The answer to that is the Governing Body itself, until now. Ever since 1952, and possibly earlier, the Watchtower has roundly condemned this practice due to its ‘ pagan roots’  in ‘ false religion’ .  The 15 May 1952 Watchtower (page 319), has this to say on the matter Jehovah God and Christ Jesus are not honored by having pagan customs of toasting switched to them, or to human s In 1968, in an answer to  Questions from Readers,  the 1 Jan Watchtower states If a Christian is going to make a request f...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...