Skip to main content

Now for the Bad News

 

It is commonly understood among Mormons that the Fall was a good thing. A 27 April post on X has sent the Christian world in a spin because it plainly said as much:

'In the LDS Church, we do not see Eve eating the forbidden fruit as a mistake or even a sin. on the contrary, we celebrate her courage and wisdom to partake of the fruit, transgress the bounds of Eden and become all that her Heavenly Father wanted her to be.'

Of course, nobody outside the Mormon Church would teach such a thing. It goes against everything the Bible tells us, everything Christianity teaches about the nature of man, the purposes of God in creation, and the meaning of the atonement.

People get uncomfortable when we use the word 'cult,' but it must be understood that error on this level cannot be winked at. It must be called out for what it is, plain heresy. People must be warned, and the fact someone 'sincerely believes it’ is no excuse. If it upsets our Mormon neighbours then perhaps it needs to.

A question I have come to ask a lot these days in discussions with cult members is, 'Where in the Bible do you find anyone talking like you, making the argument you make?' That is usually, for Mormons, the point at which they describe our Bible as corrupted and untrustworthy. Now the cat is out of the bag.

If you don't trust the Bible then what or who do you trust? The Mormon answer to that, though they would never put it so starkly, is, 'A man who went into the woods and met with two gods.' Do you see the problem now? One heresy after another and still we don't like to be so forthright. Consider Paul's words to the saints in Galatia, who had been deceived by those who would have them be circumcised:

'As for those agitators, I wish they would go the whole way and emasculate themselves!' Gal.5:12

Think about Peter, who in his second letter describes false prophets and their followers as blasphemous, irrational animals, revelling in their deceptions, ‘waterless springs and mists driven by a storm.’ 2 Peter 2

Consider Jesus’ shocking words in Matthew 23:

But woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you shut the kingdom of heaven in people's faces. For you neither enter yourselves nor allow those who would enter to go in. Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you travel across sea and land to make a single proselyte, and when he becomes a proselyte, you make him twice as much a child of hell as yourselves.’ vv 13-15

We are not talking about opinions – ‘that’s true for you, and this is true for me’ - but about eternal truths about the living God, and the fate of a lost world. We need to get past the 'let's be nice and maybe they'll like us' philosophy. That's how the cults operate; love-bombing. People don't need a security blanket, they need a wake-up call. They need a Saviour, and if they don’t know they are lost they won’t know how desperately they need him.

By all means let’s reason like Paul on Mars Hill, carefully expound like Phillip and the Ethiopian official. Let’s indeed show grace like Jesus with the woman at the well. But let’s also exhort like Peter at Pentecost, like Paul in Ephesus, challenge like Jesus with Nicodemus, and warn as did Jesus’ with sober words about wolves in sheep’s clothing. Let's be countercultural as Jesus was in the Sermon on the Mount.

Pick your method and your moment, choose your words, but don’t fail your audience in the name of diffidence and politeness. Jesus is only good news when they know how bad things are without him.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Cheers!

  In their latest update #4, the Jehovah’s Witnesses' Governing Body has announced that toasting and ‘ clinking glasses’  is now allowed at the individual Jehovah’s Witness’s ‘ bible trained conscience’ .  This, Governing Body member Stephen Lett tells us, is due to ‘ prayerful consideration’  by the Governing Body.  This doesn’t sound unreasonable; who could possibly object to toasting, it’s such an innocuous custom?  The answer to that is the Governing Body itself, until now. Ever since 1952, and possibly earlier, the Watchtower has roundly condemned this practice due to its ‘ pagan roots’  in ‘ false religion’ .  The 15 May 1952 Watchtower (page 319), has this to say on the matter Jehovah God and Christ Jesus are not honored by having pagan customs of toasting switched to them, or to human s In 1968, in an answer to  Questions from Readers,  the 1 Jan Watchtower states If a Christian is going to make a request f...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...