Skip to main content

When is a Kingdom not a Kingdom?

Last time we started looking at the Watch Tower teaching on kingdom and government. We are still in the Reasoning book, p.226 where they explain kingdom:

'The Kingdom of God is the expression of Jehovah’s universal sovereignty toward his creatures, or the means used by him to express that sovereignty. This term is used particularly to designate the manifestation of God’s sovereignty through the royal government headed by his Son, Jesus Christ. “Kingdom” may refer to the rulership of the one anointed as King or to the earthly realm ruled by that heavenly government.'

They justify their use of 'government' using Isaiah 9 - 'To us a child is born, to us a son is given; and the government will be upon his shoulder...of the increase of his government and of peace there will be no end.' Isaiah 9:6,7

They say rulership was given to Jesus (Dan.7:13,14), that by his blood, 'You bought persons for God out of every tribe and tongue and people and nation, and you made them to be a kingdom and priests to our God...' (Rev.5:8,10) and that this cast of rulers are the 144,000 of Revelation 14:1-3.

We dealt last time with who exactly is bought by his blood, and who is to reign with him for eternity. It isn’t a civil service of 144,000 but a whole nation, people group, the saved.

A Kingdom

I am thankful to Barry Amor for sharing in the discussion on the Reachout Facebook page his research that makes up much of this post. Barry points out, in the Watch Tower Society book ‘Insight on the Scriptures’ 1988, Vol1 under ‘kingdom’ page 159 it says:

The phrase [kingdom] is used particularly for the expression of God’s sovereignty through a royal government headed by his Son.’ So not the actual government itself!

The same article in the ‘Insight’ book defines the Greek word basileia (The Greek word we translate as Kingdom) as ‘a kingdom realm, the region or country governed by a king; kingly power, authority, dominion, reign, royal dignity, the title and honour of king” quoting from the Analytical Greek Lexicon 1908 p67. Notice this definition does not mention the option of it meaning a government.

Rev 5:9 tells us who are those who will rule:

And they sang a new song, saying, Worthy are you to take the scroll and to pen it’s seals, for you were slain, and by your blood you ransomed people for God from every tribe and language and people and nation.’

This has been described as ‘a multi-ethnic multitude’ and you can see why, it is a great crowd. These are those ransomed by the blood of the Lamb. Not 144,000 but a multitude. Compare their description here with that in Rev 7:9, it’s almost identical.

After this I looked, and behold, a great multitude that no one could number from every nation, from all tribes and peoples and languages, standing before the throne and before the Lamb, clothed in white robes with palm branches in their hands.’

Nowhere in the whole Bible does it say that the 144,000 will rule anything at all - not a single verse.

Vine’s Expository Dictionary

Vine says kingdom is ‘primarily an abstract noun, denoting "sovereignty, royal power, dominion," e.g., Revelation 17:18, translated "(which) reigneth," lit., "hath a kingdom" (RV marg.); then, by metonymy, a concrete noun, denoting the territory or people over whom a king rules.’

So it is either God’s rule or that over which He rules which are much the same thing. It can never mean a group of people forming a government. God may use a government to manage His kingdom, much as our King uses a government to manage the U.K., but that kingdom is not the government or vice-versa.

There is a JW argument that says kingdoms had governments, which is true, but that destroys the idea that a kingdom IS a government. Isa 9:6 doesn’t give any indication that God’s kingdom is a government, nor does any other verse in the Bible.

Born Again

The truth about God’s kingdom is really vital as we need to enter it to be under God’s rule. Whether ‘kingdom’ means God’s rule or that over which He rules we need to be in it else we are outside and Matt 8:11,12 tells us that to be outside is a very bad thing:

I tell you, many will come from east and west and recline at table with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven [there’s that multi-ethnic multitude again], while the sons of the kingdom will be thrown into the outer darkness.’

By redefining the word kingdom the Watch Tower makes it unnecessary for us to be born-again as it says in John 3:16. So Jehovah’s Witnesses don’t need to come to Jesus and be reborn as children of God. This is another way the Watch Tower Society tricks it’s members into rejecting Christ’s sacrifice.

This what cults do, they take away from the person, status, authority, and finished work of the Saviour so you end up with no Saviour, just a crowd of all-too-flawed men telling you what to do.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

The Times of the Gentiles - by Dawn Partington

Jehovah's Witnesses teach that “the times of the gentiles” is a time period of 2,520 years, beginning in 607BC and ending in AD1914. According to their doctrine, Jesus was enthroned as King in AD1914 when the “gentile times” ended. 1. Only one verse in scripture mentions “the times of the gentiles”: 'They will fall by the sword and will be taken as prisoners to all the nations. Jerusalem will be trampled on by the Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled.'  Luke 21:24 NIV. The Jehovah's Witness organisation has linked this one verse with other prophetic passages to calculate the supposed length of these “gentile times”, notably a time period which began hundreds of years before the incarnation and ended over 1900 years after it. 2. Simple examination of the text of Luke 21 reveals what Jesus was referring to when he used the phrase “the times of the gentiles”. Let's look at the passage together and distil this into four points which you may...

Resurrection or Cloning?

  In the film “The Sixth Day”, based in the near future where cloning of pets is allowed but not of humans, the main character, Adam, played by Arnold Schwarzenegger, wakes up in a taxi, not knowing how he got there.   He travels home only to see another man inside with his family; this man looks exactly like him.   Before being able to confront the imposter, Adam is attacked by unknown assailants and has to run.   This being an Arnie movie there are lots of shoot outs and the body count is high as Adam attempts to find out what is going on. It turns out that he has been cloned and the cloning company is trying to clear up the loose ends.   Spoiler alert; it turns out he is the clone and the other Adam is the original.   The story highlights some problems with the Watchtower’s ideas about ‘resurrection’.   They teach that, at death, who we are ceases to exist; there is no soul or spirit that survives death, nothing of our essence continues on. ...