Skip to main content

When is a Kingdom not a Kingdom?

Last time we started looking at the Watch Tower teaching on kingdom and government. We are still in the Reasoning book, p.226 where they explain kingdom:

'The Kingdom of God is the expression of Jehovah’s universal sovereignty toward his creatures, or the means used by him to express that sovereignty. This term is used particularly to designate the manifestation of God’s sovereignty through the royal government headed by his Son, Jesus Christ. “Kingdom” may refer to the rulership of the one anointed as King or to the earthly realm ruled by that heavenly government.'

They justify their use of 'government' using Isaiah 9 - 'To us a child is born, to us a son is given; and the government will be upon his shoulder...of the increase of his government and of peace there will be no end.' Isaiah 9:6,7

They say rulership was given to Jesus (Dan.7:13,14), that by his blood, 'You bought persons for God out of every tribe and tongue and people and nation, and you made them to be a kingdom and priests to our God...' (Rev.5:8,10) and that this cast of rulers are the 144,000 of Revelation 14:1-3.

We dealt last time with who exactly is bought by his blood, and who is to reign with him for eternity. It isn’t a civil service of 144,000 but a whole nation, people group, the saved.

A Kingdom

I am thankful to Barry Amor for sharing in the discussion on the Reachout Facebook page his research that makes up much of this post. Barry points out, in the Watch Tower Society book ‘Insight on the Scriptures’ 1988, Vol1 under ‘kingdom’ page 159 it says:

The phrase [kingdom] is used particularly for the expression of God’s sovereignty through a royal government headed by his Son.’ So not the actual government itself!

The same article in the ‘Insight’ book defines the Greek word basileia (The Greek word we translate as Kingdom) as ‘a kingdom realm, the region or country governed by a king; kingly power, authority, dominion, reign, royal dignity, the title and honour of king” quoting from the Analytical Greek Lexicon 1908 p67. Notice this definition does not mention the option of it meaning a government.

Rev 5:9 tells us who are those who will rule:

And they sang a new song, saying, Worthy are you to take the scroll and to pen it’s seals, for you were slain, and by your blood you ransomed people for God from every tribe and language and people and nation.’

This has been described as ‘a multi-ethnic multitude’ and you can see why, it is a great crowd. These are those ransomed by the blood of the Lamb. Not 144,000 but a multitude. Compare their description here with that in Rev 7:9, it’s almost identical.

After this I looked, and behold, a great multitude that no one could number from every nation, from all tribes and peoples and languages, standing before the throne and before the Lamb, clothed in white robes with palm branches in their hands.’

Nowhere in the whole Bible does it say that the 144,000 will rule anything at all - not a single verse.

Vine’s Expository Dictionary

Vine says kingdom is ‘primarily an abstract noun, denoting "sovereignty, royal power, dominion," e.g., Revelation 17:18, translated "(which) reigneth," lit., "hath a kingdom" (RV marg.); then, by metonymy, a concrete noun, denoting the territory or people over whom a king rules.’

So it is either God’s rule or that over which He rules which are much the same thing. It can never mean a group of people forming a government. God may use a government to manage His kingdom, much as our King uses a government to manage the U.K., but that kingdom is not the government or vice-versa.

There is a JW argument that says kingdoms had governments, which is true, but that destroys the idea that a kingdom IS a government. Isa 9:6 doesn’t give any indication that God’s kingdom is a government, nor does any other verse in the Bible.

Born Again

The truth about God’s kingdom is really vital as we need to enter it to be under God’s rule. Whether ‘kingdom’ means God’s rule or that over which He rules we need to be in it else we are outside and Matt 8:11,12 tells us that to be outside is a very bad thing:

I tell you, many will come from east and west and recline at table with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven [there’s that multi-ethnic multitude again], while the sons of the kingdom will be thrown into the outer darkness.’

By redefining the word kingdom the Watch Tower makes it unnecessary for us to be born-again as it says in John 3:16. So Jehovah’s Witnesses don’t need to come to Jesus and be reborn as children of God. This is another way the Watch Tower Society tricks it’s members into rejecting Christ’s sacrifice.

This what cults do, they take away from the person, status, authority, and finished work of the Saviour so you end up with no Saviour, just a crowd of all-too-flawed men telling you what to do.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

The Dangers of Adding to the Bible: Guest Post by Jacob Lambert

T oday, when we come across Jehovah’s Witnesses and Mormons we find that they are led by a group of people who hold unquestioned authority. Members of this group know this, some even believe it themselves. This puts them in a powerful position, even to the point where they can create their own Bible. Two examples are the J oseph S mith Translation of the Mormons and the N ew W orld T ranslation of the Jehovah’s Witnesses. T hey can add words into their own Bible, words that are not in other, respectable, translations. F or example, in the Greek, C olossians 1:1 6 say s that J esus created all things: ‘ He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation. For by him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities – all things were created through him and for him.’ Col.1:15,16, ESV Jehovah’s Witnesses say that this runs counter to their understanding that Jesus is God’s first creat...

Cheers!

  In their latest update #4, the Jehovah’s Witnesses' Governing Body has announced that toasting and ‘ clinking glasses’  is now allowed at the individual Jehovah’s Witness’s ‘ bible trained conscience’ .  This, Governing Body member Stephen Lett tells us, is due to ‘ prayerful consideration’  by the Governing Body.  This doesn’t sound unreasonable; who could possibly object to toasting, it’s such an innocuous custom?  The answer to that is the Governing Body itself, until now. Ever since 1952, and possibly earlier, the Watchtower has roundly condemned this practice due to its ‘ pagan roots’  in ‘ false religion’ .  The 15 May 1952 Watchtower (page 319), has this to say on the matter Jehovah God and Christ Jesus are not honored by having pagan customs of toasting switched to them, or to human s In 1968, in an answer to  Questions from Readers,  the 1 Jan Watchtower states If a Christian is going to make a request f...