Skip to main content

How Can It Not Be True - Joseph Smith (Part 2)



The video continues by showing that the true church of Jesus Christ practices various activities.

Baptism and The Gift of the Holy Spirit

It says that the early church, established by Christ, baptised by immersion, and bestowed the gift of the Holy Ghost by the laying on of hands.

Mainstream Christianity has no problem with baptism by immersion or the laying on of hands for the reception of the Holy Spirit.[1] The problem therefore lies in how Mormons understand these things.

Mormons believe that baptism is essential for exaltation and both baptism and the laying on of hands, must be administered by the proper authority i.e. by their leaders.

‘Baptism into Christ’s true church by proper authority opens the doors for exaltation in the eternal kingdoms of glory, exaltation to be earned by repentance, by living righteously, keeping the commandments of the Lord, and service to one’s fellowmen’[2]

The laying on of hands is the procedure revealed by the Lord for performing many priesthood ordinances, such as confirmation, ordination, setting members apart to serve in callings, administering to the sick, and giving other priesthood blessings (see D&C 42:44; Articles of Faith 1:4–5). Those having the proper priesthood authority place their hands upon the head of the person receiving the ordinance. In doing so, they serve as instruments through whom the Lord blesses His children (see D&C 36:2).[3]

If a person, who has previously been baptised in a different church, converts to Mormonism, they will need to be re-baptised by someone with the ‘proper authority’.

The video continues to claim the Mormon church as the true church because of its practice of divine healing and the fact that they have no paid ministry, but then comes the foundation upon which the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints stands – the so-called great apostasy.

APOSTASY

Mormons teach that, after Jesus’ resurrection and the death of his apostles, the church lost its authority. They say that the church became totally apostate and remained so for over 1700 years.

‘Every Latter-day Saint knows that following the death of the apostles, Paul’s prophecy was fulfilled, for there were many ‘grievous wolves’ that entered the flock, and men arose ‘speaking perverse things’ so that the doctrines were changed, and the true Church of Jesus Christ ceased to be on the earth. For this reason, there had to come a restoration of the Church and a new revelation and a bestowal of divine authority. The Church of Jesus Christ and the Holy Scriptures are, therefore, not responsible for the changed doctrines and unscientific teachings of those times, when uninspired ecclesiastics controlled the thinking of people’.[4]

Claiming that the basic principles of the gospel became polluted, there was a need of restoration. This happened, according to the Mormons, in 1820 when God met with a young fifteen-year-old boy named Jospeh Smith.

IS IT TRUE?

Is it true? Did the church become totally apostate and in need of restoration? If correct, then Jesus was a liar.

In part one of this article, I mentioned Matthew 16:18:

And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock, I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.

This is a difficult verse for Mormons because Jesus says that the gates of hell would not prevail against His church. Who was telling the truth Jesus or Joseph? For certain, as mentioned in the Bible itself, false teachers would arise, but according to Jesus they could never completely overthrow His Church. Therefore, there was no need for the compete restoration they claim.

A CONTINUING REVELATION

The video claims that a restoration began in 1820, and it continues today through the church’s living prophets and apostles.

‘We Latter-day Saints have that new revelation. We have a new prophet and new scriptures also, which, added to the Bible, now point the way. This new revelation brought with it the true understanding of the nature of God and a restoration of primitive Christianity. That restoration is Mormonism. It came about through the ministry of the Prophet Joseph Smith, Jun. He saw God and communed with him, even as did Moses’[5]

We can say with a certain confidence, that the church of Christ was never totally apostate, that there has never been a need for new revelation or new scriptures. The Bible is enough.

Their new revelation has not brought a new understanding of the nature of God, but rather a completely different understanding; one which is at complete odds with the God revealed in the pages of Holy Bible.

LED BY CHRIST?

The closing part of the video announces with great pride that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is on the earth today, led by him who established it. I agree!

The Mormon Church is indeed being led by him who established it, but it was not established by God. This church is not the church founded by the Lord Jesus Christ. It has a different gospel, a different Jesus and a different Spirit.

A thorough investigation of its origins and teachings, reveals that the question should not be ‘How can it not be true?’ but rather, ‘How on earth can it be true?’ Friends, it is not!

[1] Acts 19:6 And when Paul had laid his hands on them, the Holy Spirit came on them, and they began speaking in tongues and prophesying.

[2] Spencer W. Kimball, ‘The Stone Cut without Hands’ Ensign May 1976, p.7

[4] Joseph Fielding Smith, Man, His Origin and Destiny. P.467

[5] Mark E. Petersen, Conference Reports, April 1964 p.19

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...