Skip to main content

The Watch Tower, Jehovah, and Genetics

 


‘Jehovah’s forgiveness is always based on
his complete knowledge of a situation.’

In the June 2022 Watchtower Study Edition, study article 24 talks about God as the greatest forgiver. Unpacking what this means they write at one point:

'Unlike human judges, Jehovah always has a perfect grasp of all the facts of any case that comes before him. (Gen. 18:20, 21; Ps. 90:8) He is not limited by what humans see or hear. He completely understands how a person’s actions are influenced by his genetic makeup, upbringing, and environment as well as by his emotional and mental condition. Jehovah also reads the heart. He fully perceives the motivations, intentions, and desires of each person. Nothing can be hidden from Jehovah. (Heb. 4:13) Thus, Jehovah’s forgiveness is always based on his complete knowledge of a situation.'

Is this true? Does God judge according to extenuating circumstances? Is 'I couldn't help myself' a fair defence before the judge of all mankind, as they seem to suggest?


Jehovah, a God who Forgives

They acknowledge Jehovah is ready to forgive – Ps. 86:5

They admit we all need forgiveness – Eccl. 7:20

They recognise we are all sinners – 1 John 1:8

They know, Jehovah is a warm and merciful God who is always ready to forgive repentant sinners.’Neh. 9:17; Ps. 86:15.

They teach, God’s Word assures us that Jehovah is ready to forgive. When Jehovah revealed himself to Moses at Mount Sinai, He said through an angelic spokesman: Jehovah, Jehovah, a God merciful and compassionate, slow to anger and abundant in loyal love and truth, showing loyal love to thousands, pardoning error and transgression and sin.” (Ex. 34:6,7)

They even say,As John 3:16 reveals, Jehovah sent his only-begotten Son to die in our behalf. (Matt. 20:28; Rom. 5:19) Jesus took our place—suffering the penalty of death—to set free any who exercise faith in him. (Heb. 2:9)’

What are we to do, then, with, ‘Jehovah’s forgiveness is always based on his complete knowledge of a situation.'?

They say, 'Unlike human judges, Jehovah always has a perfect grasp of all the facts of any case that comes before him. (Gen. 18:20, 21; Ps. 90:8)’ Yet they go on to describe a very human judgement, based on the facts laid before the judge. They go on the say Jehovah considers:

...genetic makeup, upbringing, and environment as well as by his emotional and mental condition. Jehovah also reads the heart. He fully perceives the motivations, intentions, and desires of each person.’

Human judges today will often call for pre-sentence reports from social services and other experts to help them arrive at the most appropriate sentence, taking into account the extenuating circumstances of the offender: medical considerations, upbringing, environment, mental condition, motivations, intentions, etc. Is that how God judges? You get to benefit from Christ’s sacrifice depending on a social report?


The Commandments of Men

Mark tells us in his gospel of a time when the Pharisees criticised the disciples for sitting down to a meal unwashed, defiled, meaning ceremonially unclean. Jesus replied:

You have a fine way of rejecting the commandment of God in order to establish your tradition.’ (Mk.7:9)

The Pharisees were scrupulous with regard to the law, so much so they established their own traditions to fence about the law and protect it. However, in doing this, they substituted their own tradition for the law. This Watch Tower teaching is a modern example of what the Pharisees were doing.

JW leaders have discussed among themselves how they believe God judges and have ended up presenting the way man judges. ‘Well, he is bound to take into account extenuating circumstances. After all, he is fair.’ It is a ‘seems good to me’ gospel that is no gospel at all, anchored in man’s thinking and not God’s Word.

The New Testament is littered with such messages, from legalism, through Judaism, to antinomianism and Gnosticism, and New Testament writers were constantly having to bring correctives. I sometimes wonder if the Society even meant to say many of the things they end up saying, but they do say them, and are responsible for leading many astray.


The Commandments of God

The Bible is not the only authority in the Christian’s life. We are meant to reason things through, grow in our understanding, and we have many helps to that end. JC Ryle famously said:

Evangelical religion does not despise learning, research, or the wisdom of days gone by. It is not true to say that we do. In thorough appreciation of anything that throws light on God’s Word, we give place to none...But while we do not despise learning, we steadfastly refuse to place any uninspired writings on a level with revelation.’ (JC Ryle, Knots Untied, 9,10. Quoted in Gospel People, 34,35, Michael Reeves, Crossway, 2022)

Jehovah’s Witnesses would have us think, the Watch Tower gives this level of respect to the Bible. If this were so there is no room for anything else with regard a subject so fundamental to the Christian faith, and on which the Bible speaks so clearly.


So They are Without Excuse’
Paul, writing to Rome clearly taught, ‘both Jews and Greeks are under sin...None are righteous, no, not one.’ (Ro.3:9,10)

Earlier, Paul declared, ‘For I am not ashamed of the gospel, for it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, to the Jew first and also to the Greek.’ (Ro.1:16) All are under sin, the gospel is for all who believe. He goes on to insist:

For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth. For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse.’ (Ro.1:18-20)

Men are ungodly, unrighteous, and suppress the truth, that can be known, that is plain, because God has revealed himself in the very creation. We are not saved through general revelation, but general revelation clearly points to the God who saves, the God who promised he may be found by those who seek him wholeheartedly (Deut.4:29;Jer.29:13; John 6:37).

There are no extenuating circumstances here. Paul doesn’t write, None are righteous, no, not one, but to be fair, some have had a difficult upbringing, and then there are the genetics. We all have stories to tell but the only genetics the Bible takes into account is the inheritance of the sin nature from Adam.

For as by Adam all die, so also in Christ shall all be made alive.’ (1 Cor.15:22) Are you in Adam? Then you are a sinner, bound for a lost eternity. Do you see the evidences for God all around you, in creation, the things that are made; more, in your own conscience? Then call on him. CS Lewis observed:

God whispers to us in our pleasures, speaks in our conscience, but shouts in our pains: it is His megaphone to rouse a deaf world.’ (The Problem of Pain)

In so many ways God speaks to us and we are, indeed, left without excuse. We can rest sure in the knowledge, ‘the king of all the earth will do what is right,’ (Gen.18:25) The problem is not that God doesn’t speak, but that the world is wilfully deaf! Are we listening?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...