Skip to main content

The Truth about Mormonism - L is for Living Prophets


The Mormon church teaches that the church must always be led by a man on the earth, one who is to be regarded as the infallible prophet of God. It is he, they say, who speaks for God, who leads the church and acts as a mediator between the people and God.

At the time of writing, this is a ninety-seven-year-old man named Russell Marion Nelson.

They claim that it is through this ‘prophet’ that God speaks to his people. They are certain that he, and he alone, receives direct revelations for the whole church.

‘We are most fortunate to have a living prophet at the head of the Church to guide us, and all who need his counsel will be partakers of the promised blessings which will not be enjoyed by those who fail to accept his messages… Whose side are we on? When the prophet speaks the debate is over’.[1]

As a convinced Mormon, Brad Wilcox believes that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has always been led by a prophet. According to Mormon doctrine these men have the same stature and authority as the original apostles of the Lord Jesus.

As he comes towards the end of his train-wreck of a speech to the youth, Brad tells them that L stands for Living Prophets.

Living Prophets

As a restoration movement, Mormonism teaches that original Christianity was completely lost to apostasy. This happened after the death of the Christ’s original twelve apostles. The church was left powerless and without authority, that is until prophets were restored to the church. It was in 1829 that Peter, James and John, allegedly, appeared to Joseph and his friend Oliver Cowdery, conferring upon them the Melchizedek priesthood[2] and with it "the keys of the kingdom, and of the dispensation of the fullness of times."[3]

Since then, there has been a succession of Momon prophets, all of whom are believed to be the apostolic heirs of the original twelve. 

Many people believe in Jesus because of Peter, James and John. We believe because of Peter, James, and John, but also because of Russell, Dallin, and Henry. Same priesthood authority; same special calling; same special witness of the Savior. (Brad Wilcox)

What does he mean that many believe in Jesus because of Peter, James and John? Does he mean through their preaching and testimony about the Lord Jesus Christ, as we find recorded in Holy Scripture, that many came to believe?

What Brad saidreminded me of what Paul told the believers at Corinth when addressing divisions in the church.

What I mean is that each one of you says, “I follow Paul,” or “I follow Apollos,” or “I follow Cephas,” or “I follow Christ.” Is Christ divided? Was Paul crucified for you? Or were you baptized in the name of Paul?  1 Corinthians 1:12-13

Paul says we are not to follow men but to follow Christ. Now I realise that what Brad said is not exactly what Paul is addressing here, but in Mormonism they do follow men. Mormonism teaches that Russell (Nelson), Dallin (Oakes) and Henry (B. Eyring)[4] have the same authority as Christ’s early apostles and so they must be listened to and followed – without question. They are God’s mouthpiece.

But what does the Bible say?

“The Lord your God will raise up for you a prophet like me from among you, from your brothers—it is to him you shall listen…”

Deuteronomy 18:15

The Bible is clear that Christians have only one living Prophet – Jesus.

It is Jesus who speaks to the church…

Long ago, at many times and in many ways, God spoke to our fathers by the prophets, but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed the heir of all things, through whom also he created the world. 

Hebrews 1:1-2

 It is Jesus who leads the church…

And he is the head of the body, the church. He is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead, that in everything he might be preeminent. Colossians 1:18

 It is Jesus who mediates for the church…

For there is one God, and there is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus.  1 Timothy 2:5

Therefore, there is only one living prophet that we need – Jesus.

A Bible believing church?

Brad goes on to tell of a time before Covid when he was engaged in a conversation with an evangelical before a public audience. He said that he, and the evangelical pastor had the following dialogue:

(The Evangelical pastor asked) “Are you a Bible based Church?”, and I said “(hesitantly squealing)”, and I said finally I said, “No, not the way you’re thinking of it, but yes, in a way you’ve never thought of before.” The poor guy was just going (shaking face and making silly noises as if the minister was confounded). He didn’t know exactly what I was talking about. So, I explained. I said, “A lot of people hold the Bible up, and they say, ‘this is my religion'”. He says, “I would be one of those people”. I said, “Yeah, but the Bible is not actually religion; the Bible is a history of people who had religion. What did the people in the Bible have?

Brad doesn’t tell us how the evangelical pastor responded but let us consider a possible answer. I think I would have said that the people in the Bible had…the Bible.

These oft quoted verses used in defence of the Bible being the authoritative Word of God, speak of such:

But as for you, continue in what you have learned and have firmly believed, knowing from whom you learned it and how from childhood you have been acquainted with the sacred writings, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus.  All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness,  that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work. (2 Timothy 3:14-17)

What were the ‘sacred writings’ Paul spoke about to Timothy? What is Paul talking about when he says: ‘All Scripture’?

As the New Testament was yet to be written and collected, he clearly referred to the Old Testament. When tempted by the devil in the wilderness, how did Jesus respond? He quoted Scripture. So to answer Brad’s question: ‘What did the people in the Bible have?’ They had the Bible.

Brad, being Mormon, is trying to point to the insufficiency of Scripture, that something other than the Bible is needed. The Word of God is never enough for the cults, there always has to be extra-biblical revelation (The Book of Mormon, Living Prophets etc.)

Say Goodbye

You want to walk away from the church? Well, say goodbye to living prophets. Say goodbye. You have to see Christ through a pretty small window when you’re stuck with just the Bible, so say goodbye to the larger window that we have because of living prophets.

Brad may not be, but I am, very happy to be ‘stuck with just the Bible’. The Bible is sufficient because it contains all that is needed to equip believers for life and service. It reveals who God is, our desperate fallenness, the way of salvation and how we are to live as believers in the Lord Jesus Christ.[5]

Adding to the Word of God

You shall not add to the word that I command you, nor take from it, that you may keep the commandments of the Lord your God that I command you.  Deuteronomy 4:2

Throughout his talk Brad Wilcox has clearly shown that Mormonism adds and takes away from God’s revelation. Mormonism teaches that the Bible is insufficient, that Jesus is not enough and that leads to a false gospel.

Brad says that to leave Mormonism is to say goodbye to living prophets. He reveals what these leaders mean to him:

Say goodbye to all of these leaders that I just don’t want to live my life without. I just don’t know what my life would be without their examples, without their teachings, without their testimonies, especially when times get hard.

Here we see where his faith really lies – how sad. He concludes by telling the young people that to leave Mormonism is to lose everything. ‘Everything that truly matters most’.

My advice to these young people would be to say goodbye to this false religion[6], and to put their hope only in what truly matters – the Lord Jesus Christ. Jesus is enough!



[1] N. Eldon Tanner, “The Debate is Over,” Ensign, August 1979, p.2

[2] In Mormonism, the Melchizedek priesthood is the greater of the two orders of priesthood, the other being the Aaronic priesthood.

[3] Doctrine and Covenants 27:13

[4] These three man make up the First Presidency, which is the presiding governing body of the LDS church.

[5] 2 Timothy 3:16-17

[6] Galatians 1:8


 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...