Skip to main content

Better the Devil you know (part 3)

 


“Very few people believe in the devil these days, which suits the devil very well. He is always helping to circulate the news of his own death. The essence of God is existence, and He defines Himself as: 'I am Who am.' The essence of the devil is the lie, and he defines himself as: 'I am who am not.' Satan has very little trouble with those who do not believe in him; they are already on his side.”[1]

The Schemes of the devil

Satan uses various "wiles" with the aim of doing one of two things:

i)           To blind the minds of unbelievers – and keep them from the light of the gospel and so be saved.

ii)         To try and defeat, deflate, and discourage those who have put their faith in Christ. 

Can we know anything of the devil’ schemes? Paul the Apostle tells the church in Corinth.

…for we are not ignorant of his devices. 2 Cor.2:11

Paul here suggests that devil is predictable; once you know his schemes, you know his schemes. He doesn’t change. He has always been the same. Speaking of him, Jesus said:

He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own resources, for he is a liar and the father of it. (John 8:44)

What do we know of the devil in the beginning? He makes his first appearance on the scene in the book of Genesis.

Now the serpent was more cunning than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. And he said to the woman, “Has God indeed said, ‘You shall not eat of every tree of the garden’?”

And the woman said to the serpent, “We may eat the fruit of the trees of the garden; but of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God has said, ‘You shall not eat it, nor shall you touch it, lest you die.’”

Then the serpent said to the woman, “You will not surely die. For God knows that in the day you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.”

 So when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree desirable to make one wise, she took of its fruit and ate. She also gave to her husband with her, and he ate.

(Genesis 3:1-6)

In these verses we find the devil, also known as the serpent, appearing to the woman. Here we come across his ultimate scheme. He lies, and deceives, to undermine God’s Word.

The serpent deceives Eve through craftiness, through smooth talk. ‘Did God really say?’ His words sound good; what he offers looks good and then tastes good.

“Has God indeed said, ‘You shall not eat of every tree of the garden’?”

The Word of God

October 31st is Halloween, with its celebration of all things devilish and foul. As a Christian I, of course, choose to have nothing to do with deeds of darkness; rather I remember the date as Reformation Day. It was on this date in 1517 that Martin Luther nailed his 95 theses to the church door in Wittenberg.

Later, Luther convicted by the Word of God, bravely stood up to the religious authority of his day. Face to face with his detractors, Luther said:

Unless I am convinced by Scripture and by plain reason and not by Popes and councils who have so often contradicted themselves, my conscience is captive to the word of God. To go against conscience is neither right nor safe. I cannot and I will not recant.’

Unlike Eve, Luther could not be tempted by the devilish accusation, ‘Did God really say?’. Like the Lord Jesus himself who, when tempted by the devil responded with Scripture, Luther stood on God’s Word.

The Devil’s Scheme – Challenge the Word of God

The devil is all about undermining God’s Word and he has no trouble finding those willing to promote his diabolic plan.

It should not surprise us those atheists and secularists deny the Word of God. Nor should we be shocked that progressive or liberal Christians choose to redefine and reinterpret the clear teaching of Scripture. Then we have those deemed by the world as intelligent, scholarly, and authoritative. Those within our universities and Bible Colleges, who critique and undermine the Bible.

Of such, R.C. Sproul said:

“It is fashionable in some academic circles to exercise scholarly criticism of the Bible. In so doing, scholars place themselves above the Bible and seek to correct it. If indeed the Bible is the Word of God, nothing could be more arrogant. It is God who corrects us; we don’t correct Him. We do not stand over God but under Him.”

‘Did God really say?’ has been the tool of the devil since the beginning of creation.

If the enemy doesn’t succeed in having people doubt God’s Word, he will instead use the Word of God to foster falsehood. He masterfully tickles the ears of those who desire a god of their own making.

The Devil’s Schemes – Tickle Your Ears

It's God's will for you to live in prosperity instead of poverty. It's God's will for you to pay your bills and not be in debt.

Joel Osteen

False doctrine nothing new.

1 Timothy 4:1   Now the Spirit expressly says that in latter times some will depart from the faith, giving heed to deceiving spirits and doctrines of demons…

2 Timothy 4:3-4   For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine, but according to their own desires, because they have itching ears, they will heap up for themselves teachers; and they will turn their ears away from the truth, and be turned aside to fables.

As Paul, led by the Holy Spirit, uttered these words he did not have Jehovah’s Witnesses, Mormons, Christadelphians, and others like these in mind, though his words clearly apply to these groups. Rather, Paul was thinking about those inside the church who would be led astray. When he says: ‘in latter times’ and ‘the time will come’, surely that time is now.

Perhaps there has never been a time like ours, where so much falsehood pervades the church; where confusion and dissension abound, where many are misled into following the doctrines of demons. Yes, the devil is clearly at work in deceiving and deflecting people away from the simple, yet glorious, gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ.

Paul’s admonishment to the believers at Ephesus, to protect themselves from the enemy, is to wear the whole armour of God.

Stand therefore, having fastened on the belt of truth, and having put on the breastplate of righteousness, and, as shoes for your feet, having put on the readiness given by the gospel of peace. In all circumstances take up the shield of faith, with which you can extinguish all the flaming darts of the evil one; and take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God… (Ephesians 6:14-17)

In Jesus we Trust

I once heard a very sincere Christian say that he begins each day by symbolically putting on the armour of God – it sounded good to me. But now as I reflect upon what he said, I think why would a believer ever take it off? Surely, if we do not wear the armour 24/7 then we leave ourselves open to attack from the enemy.

Let me conclude by briefly commenting on the armour Paul tells the believers at Ephesus to wear.

Belt of Truth – Jesus is way, the TRUTH and the life. (John 14:6)

Breastplate of Righteousness – Jesus is our RIGHTEOUSNESS (1 Corinthians 1:30)

Shoes/Gospel of Peace – Jesus is the PRINCE OF PEACE (Isaiah 9:6)

Shield of Faith – Jesus is the PERFECTER OF OUR FAITH (Hebrews 12:2)

Helmet of Salvation – Jesus is our SALVATION (Acts 4:12)

Word of God/Sword of the Spirit – Jesus is the WORD of GOD (John 1:1; John 5:39,40)

In telling the church at Ephesus that, in order to defeat the enemy, they must wear the whole armour of God, was Paul saying that they need to ‘Put on the Lord Jesus Christ…’ (Romans 13:14)?

Friends, let’s heed Paul’s words, stand firm and put on Jesus.

There is nothing to fear – the victory has already been won.

Read part 2 here

Read Part 1 here


[1] Fulton J. Sheen, Life of Christ




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...