The Watch Tower teaches: ‘The Bible often calls Jesus “the Son of God.” (John 1:49) The expression “Son of God” acknowledges that God is the Creator, or Source, of all life, including that of Jesus. (Psalm 36:9; Revelation 4:11) The Bible does not teach that God literally fathered a child in the same way that humans produce children.
‘The Bible also calls the angels “sons of the true God.” (Job 1:6) And the Bible says that the first human, Adam, was a “son of God.” (Luke 3:38) However, because Jesus was God’s first creation and the only one created directly by him, the Bible describes Jesus as the foremost Son of God.’
Monogenes
The implication clearly is there is nothing so special about Jesus, except his being the ‘foremost Son of God.’ Note they avoid John 3:16, which creates real problems for them since it contains the Greek monogenes to describe Jesus’ relationship with the Father.
On Facebook Bavesh Roger weighed in: ‘Much of this depends on the understanding of monogenes. Dr. James White says that genes does not imply to give birth or to beget and is not gennasthai (to come into being) but gignesthai/ginmai (to be born), the noun form, genos meaning kind or type. He gives two examples of the usage of monegenes, Ps. 25:16(LXX) and Heb. 11:17. The vocabulary of the Greek NT also describes monogenes as 'one of a kind,' 'only,' 'unique' (unicus), but not ‘only begotten,’ which would be monogennetos.
The word biblical commentary on John notes that the LXX uses the word monogenes for the Hebrew word yahid. Isaac was called Abraham's yahid/monogenes, even though Abraham had fathered another child who was still living, but never enjoyed the status of his yahid/monogenes Isaac. When this meaning is applied to Christ in John 1:14, 18 and 1 John 4:9, it reveals that the ‘only’ Son of God has no equal, is able to reveal the Father and shares a unique relationship with God the Father from all eternity which no one else has ever shared.’
Sons of God?
I am grateful to Bavesh. The Watch Tower article references Job 1:6 to make their point but ‘the sons of God’ in that passage are described using the Hebrew ben, which can mean, son, grandson, a male youth, a son of righteousness/unrighteousness, ‘son in the faith’ (2 Tim.1:2), sons of a nation, even members of a guild or society. They are not yahid/monogenes as are Isaac and Jesus.
Luke 3:38 gives us Adam being ‘the son of God.’ From this they infer nothing special about Jesus’ sonship. The problem here is the genealogy in Luke begins, ‘Jesus himself, when he commenced [his work] was about thirty years old, being the son, as the opinion was, of Joseph, son of He’li, son of Mat’that…of Adam, son of God.’ (NWT in the Kingdom Interlinear)
The word translated ‘son’ is the Greek huios which carries a similar range of meanings as the Hebrew ben, depending on context.
Dr Michael Heiser writes:
‘[Monogenēs]
doesn’t mean “only begotten” in some sort of “birthing”
sense. The confusion extends from an old misunderstanding of the root
of the Greek word. For years monogenes
was thought to have
derived from two Greek terms mono
(“only”) and gennaō
(“to beget, bear”).
Greek scholars later discovered that the second part of the word
monogenes does
not come from the Greek verb gennao
but rather from the noun
genos (“class”
or “kind”). The term literally means “one of a kind” or
“unique” without connotation of created origin.
Heiser, The
Unseen Realm: Rediscovering the Supernatural Worldview of the Bible
(Bellingham WA: Lexham
Press, 2015)
‘Son of God’ refers to Jesus’ nature, rather than his ancestral descent, in the same way ‘Son of Man’ refers to his human nature. When the Jews picked up stones to stone him, ‘Jesus answered them, ‘I have shown you many good works from the Father; for which of them are you going to stone me?’
‘The Jews answered him, ‘It is not for a good work that we are going to stone you, but for blasphemy, because you, being a man, make yourself God.’’ (John 10:32,33)
It is no blasphemy to claim to be an angel, a messenger from God. Neither is it a capital offence to claim to be the Messiah, the Saviour of your people. It is blasphemy to call yourself God, and the Jews understood perfectly well what Jesus was saying of himself.
You can read more in an earlier post Jesus is not the Father
Also, on the website, Christ’s Divinity: Is the Jehovah’s Witness Jesus God?
Comments