Skip to main content

Why Jesus Can Never Be Enough For A Mormon.



We believe Jesus is the Son of God, the Only Begotten Son in the flesh (John 3:16). We accept the prophetic declarations in the Old Testament that refer directly and powerfully to the coming of the Messiah, the Savior of all humankind. We believe that Jesus of Nazareth was and is the fulfillment of those prophecies.[1]

Mormons claim to love Jesus. They speak of Him often and with a great fondness. They bear their testimony that Jesus is the Son of the living God and the Saviour of the world.

‘And we talk of Christ, we rejoice in Christ, we preach of Christ, we prophesy of Christ, and we write according to our prophecies, that our children may know to what source they may look for a remission of their sins.’[2]

Yes, Jesus means much to Mormons, but I would contend that He doesn’t mean everything to them. He, like many other things in the life of a Mormon, is just one piece in the LDS jigsaw puzzle of salvation. I say this, not with any malice, but because it can be proven from their own authoritative sources.

Jesus is important to the Mormon, but He is not enough – why?

Because their General Authorities and the Book of Mormon says so.

 Thus says the General Authorities

The General Authorities have administrative and ecclesiastical authority over the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. At the top of the tree sits the President, the living Prophet, with his two- counsellors and the Quorum of the Twelve. These men, past and present, are the guardians of the faith, faithfully teaching and maintaining truths only found in the ‘restored’ church.

Thus says Brigham

Brigham Young became the second Prophet, Revelator and Seer of the Mormon Church, after the founder Joseph Smith was murdered. He had some curious views on the efficacy of Jesus’ sacrifice. Firstly, Young maintained that the shed blood of Jesus was not enough to forgive all sin:

It is true that the blood of the Son of God was shed for sins through the fall and those committed by men, yet man can commit sins which it (the blood of Christ) can never remit.[3]

Yet the Bible teaches the opposite:

If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. 1 John 1:9 (Bold mine)

Jesus is enough to deal with all sin!

Brigham Young also taught that confessing that Jesus is the Christ, the long-awaited Messiah who came in the flesh is not enough. Rather he states that we must also confess another:

I have taught for thirty years, and still teach, that he that believeth in his heart and confesseth with his mouth that Jesus is the Christ and that Joseph Smith is his Prophet to this generation, is of God; and he that confesseth not that Jesus has come in the flesh and sent Joseph Smith with the fulness of the Gospel to this generation, is not of God, but is anti‑christ.[4]

To trust and confess Jesus alone, according to Young, makes one anti-Christ. This of course is preposterous. The Bible nowhere teaches that a person must confess both Jesus and Joseph. The verses Young alludes to only mentions Jesus.

Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son.

Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father: he that acknowledgeth the Son hath the Father also.

1 John 2:22-23

And, rather curiously, the great Apostle Paul never mentions the need to trust Jesus plus others:

That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.  Romans 10:9

The Bible teaches that Jesus is enough for forgiveness of sin and salvation.

Lest we think that the Mormon Church has moved on since those early days, here is a quote from their 15th President who served between 1995-2008.

In bearing testimony of Jesus ChristPresident Hinckley spoke of those outside the Church who say Latter-day Saints ‘do not believe in the traditional Christ.’ ‘No, I don’t. The traditional Christ of whom they speak is not the Christ of whom I speak. For the Christ of whom I speak has been revealed in this the Dispensation of the Fulness of Times. He together with His Father, appeared to the boy Joseph Smith in the year 1820, and when Joseph left the grove that day, he knew more of the nature of God than all the learned ministers of the gospel of the ages.”[5]

For Mormons, the Jesus of historical orthodoxy, the Jesus of the Bible is not their Jesus. They openly admit that their Jesus is a different Jesus and therefore, He is not enough. It is the same with all the so-called cults of Christianity, it is always Jesus plus, as this LDS Tract shows:

‘Christians speak often of the blood of Christ and its cleansing power. Much that is believed and taught on this subject, however, is such utter nonsense and so palpably false that to believe it is to lose one’s salvation. Many go as far, for instance, as to pretend, at least, to believe that if we confess Christ with our lips and avow that we accept him as our personal Savior, we are therefore saved. His blood, without other act than mere belief, they say, makes us clean.’[6]

Here we see them attacking the great Biblical doctrine of justification by faith. Jesus is not enough. Faith in Him is not enough, no you have to do something and that something is follow all the additional laws and ordinances added by the LDS church.

Thus says the Book of Mormon

“For we labor diligently to write, to persuade our children, and also our brethren, to believe in Christ, and to be reconciled to God; for we know that it is by grace that we are saved, after all we can do.” 2 Nephi 25:23

Jesus plus. You do your bit and God will do His bit.

This idea is supported by further LDS teaching:

We believe that Jesus’ teachings and His own matchless and perfect life provide a pattern for men and women to live by and that we must emulate that pattern as best we can to find true happiness and fulfillment in this life.[7]

Notice what it says here. Jesus, in living a perfect life, provided ‘a pattern for men and women to live by’ and ‘we must emulate that pattern as best we can…’ We need to ‘Choose the Right’ and ‘be ye perfect’. It continues:

We do not believe that we can either overcome the flesh or gain eternal reward through our own unaided efforts. We must work to our limit and then rely upon the merits, mercy and grace of the Holy One of Israel to see us through the struggles of life and into life eternal (2 Nephi 31:19; Moroni 6:4). We believe that while human works are necessary— including exercising faith in Christ, repenting of our sins, receiving the sacraments or ordinances of salvation and rendering Christian service to our neighbors — they are not sufficient for salvation (2 Nephi 25:23; Moroni 10:32). We believe that our discipleship ought to be evident in the way we live our lives. (Bold mine)[8]

So Jesus is not enough for the Mormon, but for those who know how they can do nothing to save themselves, Jesus is everything. He alone is the Saviour!



[1] https://newsroom.churchofjesuschrist.org/article/what-mormons-believe-about-jesus-christ

[2] 2 Nephi 25:26 – The Book of Mormon

[3] Brigham Young – Journal of Discourses 4:54

[4] Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses 9:312

 

[5] Gordon B Hinckley ‘Crown of Gospel is Upon Our Heads, Church News, June 20th 1998 p.7

[6] LDS Tract: What the Mormons Think of Christ, p.31

[7] https://newsroom.churchofjesuschrist.org/article/what-mormons-believe-about-jesus-christ

[8] https://newsroom.churchofjesuschrist.org/article/what-mormons-believe-about-jesus-christ



 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...