Skip to main content

Who is Lord? (Ro.10:13)

Image
By

 


In my last Watchtower Wednesday we looked at the Watchtower understanding of Romans 10:13 asking, Who is 'the Lord' in this verse? Is it Jehovah? Is it Jesus? How would you talk about this teaching to a Jehovah's Witness?

Most Bibles translate, ‘Everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.’ (ESV) The New World Translation gives us, ‘Everyone who calls on the name of Jehovah will be saved.’ Paul here is quoting a text from Joel 2:32, ‘Everyone who calls on the name of the LORD shall be saved.’ (ESV) We know that Joel is referring to Jehovah, but who is Paul writing about? I want to point out four things.


The Name

First, they give the familiar argument about Jesus using the name:

‘God’s name was important to Jesus Christ. The very first words in his model prayer were: “Our Father in the heavens, let your name be sanctified,” or made holy. (Matthew 6:9) Jesus also showed that we must come to know, obey, and love the Person behind that name if we are to gain everlasting life.—John 17:3, 6, 26.’

Notice the very first words in his model prayer did not include ‘Jehovah.’ Jesus never used the name of God, not once. I won’t go into that here, you can read in depth commentary on the issue on this blog where we ask Was God’s name removed from the New Testament? and where we address directly the claim Jesus must have used the name Jehovah. Also on the website we ask Did Jesus use the name Jehovah? and How are we to sanctify God’s name?


The Message

Second, Paul goes on to write the famous passage:

‘How then will they call on him in whom they have not believed? And how are they to believe in him of whom they have never heard? And how are they to hear without someone preaching? And how are they to preach unless they are sent? As it is written, ‘How beautiful are the feet of those who preach the good news?’’ (Ro.10:14,15, ESV)

So, we have those who are called to preach the ‘good news’ to others who, in turn, are called to believe that good news. What is the ‘good news’?

Mark declares his account of Jesus as, ‘The beginning of the good news of Jesus Christ, the Son of God.’ (Mk.1:1) It is the good news about Jesus

In his nativity account Luke writes, ‘Fear not, for behold, I bring you good news of great joy that will be for all the people. For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, who is Christ the Lord.’ (Lk.2:10,11) It is the good news about Christ the Lord.

Paul describes himself as, ‘...a servant of Christ Jesus, called to be an apostle, set apart for the good news of God.’ (Ro.1:1) It is the good news of God.

In verse 9 however he writes, ‘For God is my witness, whom I serve with my spirit in the good news of his Son…’ It is the good news of God’s Son.

Philip, in Samaria, ‘...preached good news about the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ…’ (Acts 8:12) It is the good news of God’s kingdom but it is Jesus’ name that is preached.

Peter writes of, ‘an entrance into the eternal kingdom of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.’ (1 Pet.1;11) It is the kingdom of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.

Earlier, at Pentecost, Peter proclaimed, Let all the house of Israel therefore know for certain that God has made him both Lord and Christ, this Jesus whom you crucified.’ (Acts 2:36)

Is it the good news of God or the good news of Jesus? Is it the good news of God’s kingdom, or of Christ’s kingdom? Who is Lord?


The Lord

Third, Paul makes clear in the wider text who he means when he writes about calling on the name of the Lord:

‘’The word is near you, in your own mouth and in your heart;’ that is, ‘the word’ of faith, which we are preaching. For if you publicly declare with your mouth that Jesus is Lord, and exercise faith in your heart that God raised him up from the dead, you will be saved.’ (Ro.10:8,9)

‘’The word is near you, in your own mouth and in your heart;’ is taken from Deuteronomy 30:14 where Moses insists the law of God is readily accessible through faith (see Deut.30:6). Paul takes that one idea and applies it to Christ who, like the law but better than the law, has come to us and is easily accessible through faith. Where Moses spoke of the word of the law, Paul writes of ‘the word of faith.’ Faith in what? Faith in the finished work of Christ on the cross. In what terms is our faith declared? As a public declaration that, ‘Jesus is Lord.’


Look at Jesus

Fourth, When Peter and John stood before the council in Acts 4, ‘Peter, filled with the Holy Spirit, said to them, ‘Rulers of the people and elders, If we are being examined today concerning a good deed done to a crippled man, by what means this man has been healed, let it be known to all the people of Israel that by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom you crucified, whom God raised from the dead - by him this man is standing before you well. This Jesus is the stone that was rejected by you, the builders, which has become the cornerstone. And there is salvation in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.’’ (Acts 4:8-12, ESV) No other name...

The writer to the Hebrews describes the Son as, the radiance of the glory of God and the exact imprint of his nature, and he upholds the universe by the word of his power.’ (Heb.1:3) Man, in the beginning was made ‘in the image of God’ (Gen.1:27), Christ is the exact imprint of God’s nature. ‘Exact imprint’ translates the Greek charaktēr, the exact expression of God. As we so often say, if you want to know what God is like look at Jesus.

The solution to our conundrum, of course, is Trinitarian. These are the truths with which early Christians wrestled as they saw Jesus as so much more than a created being, while holding to the Hebrew teaching of God’s singularity, ‘the Lord our God, the Lord is one.’ (Deut.6:4) Short of this, you have two Lords and two gods (John 1:1, NWT) Their conclusion, and ours, is...

Jesus Christ is Lord: Acts 2:36; Rev.17:14; 1 Tim.6:15; Rev.19:6; Acts 10:36; Ro.10:12; 14:9; John 13:13; 1Cor.8:6; 1 Tim.1:2; 2 Pet.1:2; 2:20…

‘But sanctify Christ as Lord in your hearts…’

1 Peter 3:15

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

By
In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

By
The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...
70 comments
Read more

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

By
The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...
18 comments
Read more