Skip to main content

The Five Solas – Why They are Still Important Today (Part 3)

 

So far we have given a brief description of the five solas, which underpinned the Protestant Reformers dispute with the Roman Catholic Church. The five, namely Sola Scriptura, Solus Christus, Sola Fide, Sola Gratia and Soli Deo Gloria were all important pillars but it is to be noted, that four of these five principles flow from the one. Sola Scriptura.


Sola Scriptura – Scripture Alone

Sola Scriptura, known as the formal cause of the Reformation, is the doctrine that the Scriptures are the unique, final, supreme authority for the life and faith of the Christian. And it is this foundational doctrine that upholds and supports the other ‘solas’.

Martin Luther said:

We must make a great difference between God's Word and the word of man. A man's word is a little sound, that flies into the air, and soon vanishes; but the Word of God is greater than heaven and earth, yea, greater than death and hell, for it forms part of the power of God, and endures everlastingly. 1

The ‘Tradition’ spoken of by the Roman Catholic Church was, in Luther’s mind, no more than the word of man. It must therefore be rejected as equal in authority to Scripture. It was not that the Reformers were saying that tradition wasn’t at all valid or people’s experiences didn’t count, but neither of these were equal to Scripture. Tradition and experience had, like everything else, to come under the submission and authority of Holy Writ.

It is also important to mention that the Reformers were not, in proclaiming Sola Scriptura, bringing about some ‘new’ doctrine. It was their assertion that they were simply returning to the teaching and practice of the early church.

The great Baptist preacher of the nineteenth century, Charles Spurgeon agrees. Speaking of those first believers he says:

Evidently, they regarded the statements of Scripture as conclusive. They took counsel of the Scriptures, and so they ended the matter. “It is written,” was to them proof positive and indisputable. “Thus saith the Lord,” was the final word: enough for their mind and heart, enough for their conscience and understanding.

To go behind Scripture did not occur to the first teachers of our faith: they heard the Oracle of divine testimony, and bowed their heads in reverence. So it ought to be with us: we have erred from the faith, and we shall pierce ourselves through with many sorrows, unless we feel that if the Scripture saith it, it is even so.2


What does Scripture say?

But as for you, continue in what you have learned and have firmly believed, knowing from whom you learned it and how from childhood you have been acquainted with the sacred writings, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work. 

(2 Timothy 3:14-17)

These verses are perhaps the most oft-quoted when speaking about the doctrine of sola Scriptura, and with good reason. Paul shares with young Timothy the following:

It is ‘the sacred writings, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus’.

It is ‘ All Scripture is breathed out by God…’ The Greek word translated here as ‘breathed out’ is θεόπνευστος (theopneustos) literally ‘God breathed’

It (Scripture) is ‘profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness’.

It is (Scripture) that makes the man of God...complete, equipped for every good work’.

The Apostle is clearly pointing this young disciple to Scripture, and Scripture alone. He says it is Scripture that makes a person wise for salvation and it is Scripture that teaches a believer how to live.

Scripture elsewhere teaches the importance of the written word.

I have applied all these things to myself and Apollos for your benefit, brothers, that you may learn by us not to go beyond what is written, that none of you may be puffed up in favour of one against another. (1 Corinthians 4:6)

Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a worker who has no need to be ashamed, rightly handling the word of truth.

(2 Timothy 2:15)

For the word of God is living and active, sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing to the division of soul and of spirit, of joints and of marrow, and discerning the thoughts and intentions of the heart. (Hebrews 4:12)

Your word is a lamp to my feet and a light to my path. (Psalm 119:105)

Blessed rather are those who hear the word of God and keep it! (Luke 11:28)

The grass withers, the flower fades, but the word of our God will stand forever. (Isaiah 40:8)



Thus saith the Lord

The issue that the Reformers were dealing with back in the sixteenth century, remains the big issue today. It is the question of authority.

Though many within the Protestant church would say they believe in Sola Scriptura and have it as part of their doctrinal statements on their various websites and literature, in practice they either wilfully, or ignorantly, deny it.

This is rife in the church of the twenty first century. This usually appears in the guise of trying to make Scripture fit the prevailing zeitgeist; claims of we need to read Scripture in the context of our society – times have changed – this is the twenty first century you know – we have to make Scripture appropriate for our time and culture etc.

All of this denies the sufficiency of Scripture. It is claimed that Scripture can, and indeed must, change; that Scripture can evolve or be completely disregarded; that Scripture is not the infallible, inerrant Word of God.

These ideas have lead to downright wackiness and outright heresy within mainstream Protestantism. In our final article, we will consider how the abandonment of Sola Scriptura has left the church vulnerable to falsehood and opened a way for cults to flourish.

1"Table Talk" as translated by William Hazlitt.(1857)

2C.H. Spurgeon, The Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit. Vol. 36, (Banner of Truth Trust, 1970), 278.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...